Fade.To.Black
Well-known member
JWH, yet another high-shot. Biomechanics expert will say it was the direction the breeze was blowing that caused it. No punishment. Wash, rinse, repeat.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@Geo said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152891) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152887) said:These new rules make it very hard for the team who’s behind to make a comeback. In all three games it’s been fairly even, one team gets a few calls and then they run away with it. Obviously the losing teams haven’t been good but we are yet to see a close contest unless Rabbitohs stage a comeback.
Well Souff's have completed more sets have received more 6 again's and more penalties and had more tackles in the opposition 20 as well as more 7 tackle sets and more force drop outs than the Rorters so far...
@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152894) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152892) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152890) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152888) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152887) said:These new rules make it very hard for the team who’s behind to make a comeback. In all three games it’s been fairly even, one team gets a few calls and then they run away with it. Obviously the losing teams haven’t been good but we are yet to see a close contest unless Rabbitohs stage a comeback.
That doesn't bother me. Neither the broncs or the tits have a decent spine to get them back into a contest. Its getting back to footy.
Leads to less exciting footy if this keeps up. Personally not a fan of watching blowouts
I'm fine with it if it leads to bringing back more footy players and less 100kg robots with no skills just running lines.
I have no problem at all with skillful players running rough shot over guys that just happen to be athletic.
There’s never been more skill in footy than there is now. We’ve had some of the greatest playmakers of all time with the two ref system in place.
@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152897) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152894) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152892) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152890) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152888) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152887) said:These new rules make it very hard for the team who’s behind to make a comeback. In all three games it’s been fairly even, one team gets a few calls and then they run away with it. Obviously the losing teams haven’t been good but we are yet to see a close contest unless Rabbitohs stage a comeback.
That doesn't bother me. Neither the broncs or the tits have a decent spine to get them back into a contest. Its getting back to footy.
Leads to less exciting footy if this keeps up. Personally not a fan of watching blowouts
I'm fine with it if it leads to bringing back more footy players and less 100kg robots with no skills just running lines.
I have no problem at all with skillful players running rough shot over guys that just happen to be athletic.
There’s never been more skill in footy than there is now. We’ve had some of the greatest playmakers of all time with the two ref system in place.
Not being rude or sarcastic mate but you're fairly young?
@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152897) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152894) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152892) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152890) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152888) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152887) said:These new rules make it very hard for the team who’s behind to make a comeback. In all three games it’s been fairly even, one team gets a few calls and then they run away with it. Obviously the losing teams haven’t been good but we are yet to see a close contest unless Rabbitohs stage a comeback.
That doesn't bother me. Neither the broncs or the tits have a decent spine to get them back into a contest. Its getting back to footy.
Leads to less exciting footy if this keeps up. Personally not a fan of watching blowouts
I'm fine with it if it leads to bringing back more footy players and less 100kg robots with no skills just running lines.
I have no problem at all with skillful players running rough shot over guys that just happen to be athletic.
There’s never been more skill in footy than there is now. We’ve had some of the greatest playmakers of all time with the two ref system in place.
Not being rude or sarcastic mate but you're fairly young?
@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152899) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152897) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152894) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152892) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152890) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152888) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152887) said:These new rules make it very hard for the team who’s behind to make a comeback. In all three games it’s been fairly even, one team gets a few calls and then they run away with it. Obviously the losing teams haven’t been good but we are yet to see a close contest unless Rabbitohs stage a comeback.
That doesn't bother me. Neither the broncs or the tits have a decent spine to get them back into a contest. Its getting back to footy.
Leads to less exciting footy if this keeps up. Personally not a fan of watching blowouts
I'm fine with it if it leads to bringing back more footy players and less 100kg robots with no skills just running lines.
I have no problem at all with skillful players running rough shot over guys that just happen to be athletic.
There’s never been more skill in footy than there is now. We’ve had some of the greatest playmakers of all time with the two ref system in place.
Not being rude or sarcastic mate but you're fairly young?
I am but I still know Thurston, Cronk, Smith are some of the best every playmakers we’ve seen. Obviously there’s been plenty of great playmakers in the past as well but the game has evolved a long way
@mike said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152902) said:Video ref calls are interesting. It’s seems to me now they are looking for reasons to give the try. In the last few seasons it was more like they were looking for reasons to not give the try.
@Fade-To-Black said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152895) said:JWH, yet another high-shot. Biomechanics expert will say it was the direction the breeze was blowing that caused it. No punishment. Wash, rinse, repeat.
@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152899) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152897) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152894) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152892) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152890) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152888) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152887) said:These new rules make it very hard for the team who’s behind to make a comeback. In all three games it’s been fairly even, one team gets a few calls and then they run away with it. Obviously the losing teams haven’t been good but we are yet to see a close contest unless Rabbitohs stage a comeback.
That doesn't bother me. Neither the broncs or the tits have a decent spine to get them back into a contest. Its getting back to footy.
Leads to less exciting footy if this keeps up. Personally not a fan of watching blowouts
I'm fine with it if it leads to bringing back more footy players and less 100kg robots with no skills just running lines.
I have no problem at all with skillful players running rough shot over guys that just happen to be athletic.
There’s never been more skill in footy than there is now. We’ve had some of the greatest playmakers of all time with the two ref system in place.
Not being rude or sarcastic mate but you're fairly young?
I am but I still know Thurston, Cronk, Smith are some of the best every playmakers we’ve seen. Obviously there’s been plenty of great playmakers in the past as well but the game has evolved a long way
@Tiger_Steve said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152905) said:So not having a go at him but three games at fullback for Mitchell have all been very average at best. Positional play terrible and involvement minimal. Very expensive experiment when he could be arguably the games best centre
@cochise said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152910) said:@Tiger_Steve said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152905) said:So not having a go at him but three games at fullback for Mitchell have all been very average at best. Positional play terrible and involvement minimal. Very expensive experiment when he could be arguably the games best centre
Glad we didn't get him in the end, though I wasn't at the time.
@cochise said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152909) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152899) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152897) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152894) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152892) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152890) said:@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152888) said:@JoshColeman99 said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152887) said:These new rules make it very hard for the team who’s behind to make a comeback. In all three games it’s been fairly even, one team gets a few calls and then they run away with it. Obviously the losing teams haven’t been good but we are yet to see a close contest unless Rabbitohs stage a comeback.
That doesn't bother me. Neither the broncs or the tits have a decent spine to get them back into a contest. Its getting back to footy.
Leads to less exciting footy if this keeps up. Personally not a fan of watching blowouts
I'm fine with it if it leads to bringing back more footy players and less 100kg robots with no skills just running lines.
I have no problem at all with skillful players running rough shot over guys that just happen to be athletic.
There’s never been more skill in footy than there is now. We’ve had some of the greatest playmakers of all time with the two ref system in place.
Not being rude or sarcastic mate but you're fairly young?
I am but I still know Thurston, Cronk, Smith are some of the best every playmakers we’ve seen. Obviously there’s been plenty of great playmakers in the past as well but the game has evolved a long way
Mate, nothing wrong with being young, you have a lot of very good opinions about football but tend to overrate the current game a little too much, just like us oldies do with the game we remember from when we were younger. Cronk was a great organising half but was not a great ball player, he was actually an athlete turned inti a halfback with incredibly hard work and determination. Ballplaying wasn't natural to him.
@Tiger_Steve said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152905) said:So not having a go at him but three games at fullback for Mitchell have all been very average at best. Positional play terrible and involvement minimal. Very expensive experiment when he could be arguably the games best centre
@mike said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152916) said:@Tiger_Steve said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152905) said:So not having a go at him but three games at fullback for Mitchell have all been very average at best. Positional play terrible and involvement minimal. Very expensive experiment when he could be arguably the games best centre
He’s a crap fullback. There I said it. Mitchell is a Center pure and simple.
@gallagher said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152907) said:@mike said in [Round 3 Discussion \*SPOILERS\*](/post/1152902) said:Video ref calls are interesting. It’s seems to me now they are looking for reasons to give the try. In the last few seasons it was more like they were looking for reasons to not give the try.
Its pretty noticeable isn't it. Not sure if that's good or bad.