I honestly think some of you have it totally wrong. Packer and Mats were bought for a specific reason by the old coach.
Madge on the other hand has his own specific style and it's not surprising that the forwards are bearing the brunt of the changes - because Madge is known for his forwards style. He plays big bodies, maximum fitness (almost at risk of burnout) and opts for power where possible.
Now at Tigers Madge doesn't have a lot of power at his disposal, because we didnt recruit that way. We recruited toilers, some would say plodders, but guys who absolutely lack explosive power.
Who has benefitted from that 2019? The big bodies long minutes guys or power blokes (nobody is both) - Twal, Eiso, Mikaele, Aloiai. Who misses out? ET, Packer, Mats semi-demoted .
Of course Packer can still play to first grade level, but the coach wants a different type of player. So Packer is demoted - and it ends up no different to the Farah scenario where you don't want a fellow so you resign him to reggies. Yes I am totally aware Farah is a club legend etc but on the basic level - thr coach doesn't want him so he wallows in reggies.
Specific to Packer, lots of uninformed comments about what kind of guy he is, that he doesnt care etc. If may simply be he cant play the way Madge wants, which may be no reflection on the player - he didnt sign on to play under Madge. We don't know why he's not turning out in reserves - that might be a club decision. Farah didnt turn out for Magpies either - its not so straight forward to just play reserves until your form warrants a call-up.
The coach may have in fact said he will not call him back to firsts.