I think that enforcement of the cap is a joke and many aspects seem to have varying interpretation that the NRL should ensure there is only 1 interpretation. At various times I have heard market value being raised in player value, also the club has to gave the available money set aside for x player before they can be offered a contract, and that no contract can be offered unless the club is under their cap for the years involved. All that at various times have been said by WT management as NRL hurdles they have to get past before they can offer/sign a player. Now bearing that in mind how are Canterbury and Roosters able to do what they do?