One of the main gripes of the guys who wanted the review was the inability of the club to stick to a plan and here we go again. The media will have another day out. Of course if it is true
He is a tool who loves himself and uses self promotion to stay in the spotlight.
The Sheens / Tigers DNA plan at least had some logic behind it. Knifing Sheens and hiring Fulton was just amateurish. Everyone responsible needs to go play in a different sandpit. Rugby Leagues not for them.
NRL hands us enough money to run football every year. We don’t need Lee.
Front of jersey sponsors are a big deal too. I doubt we would be short of suitors, even with us coming dead last.
it's all about the sales pitch. Potentially a rags to riches tale for a big corporate backer. Marshall offers a company a lot of exposure too. We can move on from the seedy law firm no worries.
there's a whole army of disgruntled supporters waiting to spend their money on the club if they get rid of some mgt dead wood.
The money the NRL gives us is basically the salary cap, I guess that would be about 40% of our total expenditure. So we have to find a lot of cash each year outside of Wests leagues and the NRL. Finding big money sponsorship deals is not easy especially when your a cellar dewler
It's closer to 1.5 x the cap. In the words of Shane Richardson, you'd have to be a moron to go broke running an NRL club.
Whos to say we wont get bigger and better sponsorship once the conflict of interest is taken out of the board.
Lately??? All the time.
Beg to differ. Imo Sheens was always a retrograde move. Stevie Wonder would have seen that for the clusterfuck it was before he was in his old man's kegs.
we'll never know for sure because the architects pulled the pin after about 6 weeks the hopeless c#$%s
Sheens DNA was being a loser. 3 finals series in 12 seasons
Not disagreeing but it’s better than the zero final series in the other 12.
The problem at our club is far higher up than a four-time premiership winning coach.
