Tiger_Steve
New member
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1079124) said:@Tiger_Steve said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1079117) said:@2041 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1079115) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1079103) said:Ultimately I think the Roosters under did their offer to Latrell and it backfired on them
Angus Crichton is a great player but not more valuable than Latrell in my opinion and he was on $2.7m over 3 years (2019 $1.0m, 2020 & 2021 $850k) and they offer less to Latrell at $800k
Maybe the cap is having it's very first bite back at the Chooks, but that's probably wishful thinking
I agree, and I think some of the anti-Mitchell articles I've read are completely out of line. The Roosters made him an offer, he told them he wanted to test his value on the market, they withdrew the offer. It's not disloyal to see what else might be out there, and it's not fair for a club to make its offer conditional on a player not looking around. That's especially true because Mitchell is out of contract after 2020.
It's a totally different situation to Matterson. Matterson signed a three-year deal and demanded more money or a release after one. Mitchell wanted to see what might be on offer after his current contract expired - it was the Roosters' decision to (a) withdraw their offer for 2021 onwards and (b) offer to release him for 2020.
I see what you’re saying but to offer an immediate release surely means there’s more to it.
Not necessarily. I think it's just a matter of them having Billy Smith coming through who will slot into Mitchell's centre spot. They probably have someone lined up to buy with Mitchells money.
That may be right. It just seems to me that he’s too good a player to give up on so easily.