krissy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2011
- Messages
- 842
It isn’t exactly like a contract actually is binding or means anything in the current NRL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
@851 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087307) said:So we miss another target, this is getting to be a major issue
@the_third said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087299) said:@Glenn5150 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087295) said:@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087222) said:@tiger05premier said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087200) said:@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087199) said:Souths should have 360k taken out of their cap for the next 10 years. That's if they don't want a million a year for the next few years
I thought if you were medically retired the player got his money per year as per contract and the money no longer counted in the salary cap
So why than does Burgess have to work 10 years in the office to get his money?
Am I missing something?
Yes, though it is all a massive grey area.
You can be medically retired by the insurance company, or the NRL itself. If Insurance covers a player's wage by medical retirement then the club doesn't have to pay it out, and it gets excluded in the cap.
I've recently learnt that the Chief Medical Officer of the NRL can also retire players, but the club still has to pay their contracts in full, unless insurance declares him unfit to return etc. ***It's not 100% clear what happens with salary when the NRL 'medically retires' a player***, the NRL seems to be able to negotiate terms to a degree. But given the rumour of Souths offering him a 10 year deal worth 3.6 million in an off field role this is their way of ensuring he gets paid in full, via a revised payment plan of sorts. It is his playing contract they're paying him and thus they spread it out to soften the blow.
It is 100% clear, the NRL has a clear written rule about it. They have to prove it wasnt a pre-existing condition, that it was a new unique career ending injury and it has to be able to be shown to have happened at a particular moment in a specific game during the term of his current contract.
Clear rules. Burgess had had 2 previous reconstructions on that shoulder before his last contract.
Career ending is the key. It’s an 18 month injury
@Kazoo-Kid said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087311) said:With Zac Lomax out of the equation, looks like we'll all be talking about Matt Moylan for the next wee while. Enjoy. lol.
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087313) said:@Kazoo-Kid said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087311) said:With Zac Lomax out of the equation, looks like we'll all be talking about Matt Moylan for the next wee while. Enjoy. lol.
If Moylan turns us down we’ll be talking Alex Johnston and Matt Dufty
@Tiger_Steve said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087309) said:@851 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087307) said:So we miss another target, this is getting to be a major issue
It’s been an issue for years. And there’s no sign it’s changing. Despite all the talk and bluster. Our current top 17 is very very average.
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087313) said:@Kazoo-Kid said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087311) said:With Zac Lomax out of the equation, looks like we'll all be talking about Matt Moylan for the next wee while. Enjoy. lol.
If Moylan turns us down we’ll be talking Alex Johnston and Matt Dufty
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087313) said:@Kazoo-Kid said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087311) said:With Zac Lomax out of the equation, looks like we'll all be talking about Matt Moylan for the next wee while. Enjoy. lol.
If Moylan turns us down we’ll be talking Alex Johnston and Matt Dufty
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087320) said:Johnson on the wing with JAC on the other provides a nice boost in pace, Dufty at a bargain price is streets ahead of the entitled princess from the Shire. If Maguire is speaking with Moylan he deserves to go.
@gallagher said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1087316) said:Despite the claims of the bagdad bobs on here, something is very wrong with the club. They need to address it.