cochise
Well-known member
@Geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1226440) said:@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1226426) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1226422) said:@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1226341) said:@Curly_Tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1225998) said:@supercoach said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1225937) said:@Geo said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1225873) said:@supercoach said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1225858) said:@facepalmer said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1225702) said:Honestly I would have at least made ET a small offer. He's good for the squad and doesn't shy away from work at all.
Not that easy. The NRL are reducing the number of contracts down to 28 from 30. So it’s not only cap space that is a issue but also roster spots. It’s why they are letting Benji go. Things could change if Grub Packer and Moses M find a new home and we are only paying half or less of the freight.
Is that in concrete..
Have seen nothing official from the NRL in that regard..
No nothing offical but it will happen, they have let a few leaks out there to soften the offical notice when it comes.
If I were the Tigers I would fill up 30 spots now and when it’s reduced just discard Packer and Reynolds
Yeah I agree ? if it’s possible
That’s the unknown, if there is going to be 28 players is there any possibility of cutting two players with no cap impact?
For example can we just pay out Packer and JRey, go our separate ways and have that payout sit outside the cap because whilst they’d have been in the top 30, they don’t make the top 28
Seems to me there’s a case to be made by a club management team worth it’s salt
In all likelihood it would be that the bottom 2 paid players would drop out of the squad.
Yeah maybe but what if they were two young guns you had on cheap deals, I doubt that $ alone can be the decider as even roster construction may come into it. Again, say those two were both halves
It will be interesting, I just think it’s an opportunity if we think of how we can make it work to our advantage
$ value is exactly how it works, it always has been.
Yes when there was a 2nd tier Cap system..
That was replaced by Top 30 NRL squads..how Clubs balance those up to them..
This reduction in squad size wont cost Clubs 2 players in a sense that Rosters aren't full yet..
What it will do is hamper recruitment as less spots to fill..unless existing players can be moved but all Clubs would be in the same Canoe..
Another option would be to reduce minimum wage contracts leave it at 30 but the RLPA wouldn't go for that..
Exactly, this wont be a way out of contract we don't want.
