jirskyr
Well-known member
@tigerwest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1300020) said:@jirskyr said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299980) said:@tigerwest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299840) said:@sleeve said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299835) said:@tigerwest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299827) said:@sleeve said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299820) said:@jadtiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299815) said:@bathursttiger1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299813) said:@lauren said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299806) said:@jirskyr said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299766) said:@needaname said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299697) said:@cochise said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299673) said:@needaname said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299671) said:@weststigerman said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299604) said:@spartan117 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299598) said:@the_pom said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299215) said:That’s 100% correct no formal offer was put forward to McInnes or his management, catch up was to gage exactly where he was at & his thoughts on playing position which at the time was Hooker or nothing else hence discussions didn’t really eventuate further.
Seems McInnes has had a re-think on his Hooker stance.
**The Tigers should have been smarter.**
**The Club Should rethink the publicity associated with public meetings.**
This would avoid sensationalist stories being published and leaving the our club again looking like it took a yet another blow in the recruitment market.
Been thinking that as well. Madge is very hands on but might make sense to let Hartigan do the public meetings, he’s a lot less recognisable.
In response to a couple of the above quotes.
The club being smarter about it.
Agree. We probably need to be less and more transparent. In the case of meetings. I feel it’s fine to have meetings between players and the coach. What I would like to hear is Madge openly refruting media reports.
In the case of meeting with Cam.
Quote something like. “Cam is a solid player and would be a welcome addition to any team as the opening statement.
If pressed further, state, “cam and I have a previous history from another club and he was just after some career advise. Pressed if the tigers would sign him to play hooker or any other position.
“No, we are very satisfied with our current roster”
Not one of our front facing people. Coach, recruitment manager, CEO or Chairman should make a statement saying they are looking at signing this player.
Furthermore to that. It’s time the tigers get on the front foot with the media.
Threaten them with removing any chance of exposure.
This whole we have a preferred reporter and leaking little droplets out to those sources is crueling us.
Treat the media. All sources as an equal entity and deny them access. Only provide them information through offical club statements.
If they don’t agree. Tell them we just going to give up red herrings at every opportunity and we will not allow you access to our players.
Make a stand!
It doesn't work like that.
Tell me if you can, how it does work.
Why does the media have so much leverage over only a select few clubs?
Why do other clubs get away with silence until an official announcement is made.
If your going to tell me well because we aren’t one of the strong clubs and don’t have the relations to ensure favourable press.
We’ll explain to me how a basket case club like the bulldogs can get away with no misreporting until an offical announcement was made. Tigers have been linked to JAC the whole time then as soon as JAC said it’s not happening it was silence everywhere until an offical announcement.
The bulldogs used to have high influence with the likes of Ray Dib but he is no longer on their board.
In fact outside of the football team which is often gloated about the football club is reported as a shambles but yet media likes and players still flock to them.
We can’t get a favourable report from our very own James Hooper. Paid member and fan of the Tigers’s. Have the club shut him out so, now anything that doesn’t come his way he has a grind against?
They'll print whatever sells.
I don't understand why anyone gets pent up about media reporting. Media are generally lazy and desperate for attention / clicks. They'll trot out the same old stories if it continues to get views for their newspaper.
Tigers are easy to flog as we haven't made the finals in 10 years. It's much harder to fling mud at clubs who have had some decent success. Tigers are easy targets and with a large and wider supporter base to appeal to.
Secondary to all of this, I bet my bottom dollar that many clubs have as much negative reporting as Tigers do, but fans have selection bias towards Tigers news.
Couldn't agree more.
Just wanted to add logic, facts and reasoning usually evades their minds though so it can be amusing, if you choose to look at it that way.
I'll admit I don't like when we're baited though. I see Lee is now included in the Folau talk.
Why oh why would Lee want to get WT involved in the Folau circus.
Completely agree we have had a good off season why spoil it by speaking to a pensioner who creates division?
Lee is a problem.
He is also our Chairman and major sponsor, he can say what he likes, we all do.
How many Chairmen put their bib in ?
I don't know, you tell me, he is allowed to comment on anything he likes, as it happens, he was on his regular SEN broadcast, when apparently asked a question, which he seems to have answered quite well.
"Tigers don't keep us appropriately informed!"
also
"Tigers make too many public comments!"
also
"Tigers should keep everything in-house and out of the media!"
also
"I wish we had an update on potential signings!"
How do they keep everything "in house" if they have to keep you informed and updated?
That's my point?