@gallagher said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1481204) said:
@ccwt said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1481202) said:
@gallagher said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1481200) said:
@gcfan said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1481186) said:
@strongee said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1481166) said:
@needaname said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1481162) said:
@strongee said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1481157) said:
@needaname said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1481151) said:
@strongee said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1481147) said:
@needaname said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1481136) said:
You know who the real winners of this GF are?
The Dogs and the Broncos.
Who said we needed a draft?
We do. And the AFL system , still works both with academies and the draft .
The best players nominate themselves , for financial and top 30 reasons . Say a 3 round draft ? That’s 51 players .
The rest remain in their currrent academies , or sign contracts if not taken .
You have protections , like the father son rule to protect legacy names .
And if a team wants to keep their academy player , they trade their draft picks to whoever picks them etc .
If say the next Benji gets picked at 1, and he’s ours , then there’s predetermined trades that allow us to retain our asset, if he’s a generational player. Say 3 years of 1st round picks, obviously forfeiting the right to retain for those 3 years .
Or something of that ilk . It’s complicated , but scratches all backs.
And if a player won’t leave , then the team who retains his rights say , the next Benji , as an example , then we’d have to trade assets to retain etc .
I think you’d find , for most kids , the lure of big dollars , and a guaranteed top 30 contract , plus the prestige of getting picked , would negate any of the “I’m not going “ chat .
Plus don’t pick that player . Pick another one who is willing .
This happens ALLL THE TIME in the MLB draft , which contracts
Predetermined for that draft slot.
No we don’t. Potentially a rookie draft for any player not signed to a dev contract or a top 30 contract.
Penrith have proven that you don’t need to recuit Marquess for success, they are only doing what Melbourne figured out all those years ago in 2002.
Melbourne paid Hoffman , a then 16 year old , 170k to go to their system . Same for Inglis and Folau . That was unheard of , until the sharks paid Karl Filiga 200k , I believe ad a 17 year old. So no , they didn’t sign nobodies , they invested in the right juniors , and they should be commended , but a lot of the time that meant actual dollars for the family not just the systems. Sheesh the roosters just paid that kid from south’s close to a mil , and he hadn t played a game yet of u20s .
The current system is broken, and only benefits the few .
If they are signing onto first grade contracts. That is fair game. If they are paying a Ronald Volkman $50k to stick around in the 20s that’s a different story.
Were the above mentioned kids signed onto first grade contracts?
I personally wouldn’t care if I knew the roosters were paying 13 mil for thier team and we were paying 9.5. I would know , and adjust my expectations accordingly .
So because you know what we’re paying Vs the opposition it’s makes you feel better that we’d get belted forever? I agree, the salary cap is flawed but we need something to try to even the playing field.
We only want a level playing field because we can't compete. There's a salary cap and the NRL cover that. It's not a level playing field because we're at terribly run. How do the NRL stop that?
Agreed, if we had of kept ‘the big four’ we would prob be a consistent top eight side
Absolutely!! If we had great juniors coming through and were in the top 4 , no one here would be asking for a draft and wanting a level playing field. We just want the governing body to help us out. It's pathetic.
Sorry man , I ? disagree . I’ve been on the side of the draft for longer periods than the Benji era , and this last 10 years . I hate how it’s turned into the premier league .
If you mess up , or hire the wrong person in the NRL, you’ve killed your franchise . It’s ridiculous . And there’s no Avenue out , unless you win the geographical lottery , with some amazing talent .
Even then the best kids are fed at a very early age , from managers and hangers on to go to the big clubs .
It’s a never ending cycle of mediocrity .
Name a team that’s pulled themselves out of the sewer ? the knights right ? after all their spending , they managed 7th , and Pongas contract is up soon . They literally tanked for 5 years to move up to 7th . And if ponga leaves , then it’s straight back to the bottom .
Taking your tigers hat off for a second , fans are checking out ,because of this , The premier league even offers relegation and promotion , 2 cups , and European honours , for 2 leagues . So there’s consolation prizes ,and reasons for fans to be invested .
There’s nothing in the NRL, and basically having every team compete for the best talent , means the best talent goes to the best team .
People around my age group aren’t talking about footy anymore . Not really . I remember it just being talked about everywhere all the time . You can say it’s the rule changes , sure , but no one wants to see Melbourne vs whoever every year . Or the roosters , or south’s , and now Penrith have taken advantage of the regional pride that’s always existed there .
That pride doesn’t exist in Ctown . People have either moved their , or , they grew up and are looking for greener pastures . It’s not a judgement , but it’s the same reason the magpies , and now us , the tigers have failed to get a foothold . It’s the reason MacArthur won’t don’t much etc .
What about Gold Coast ? Canberra ? bulldogs ? St George ? Cronulla and manly , are geographically blessed , and cursed at the time . They will always attract talent because of geography , but their resources are finite because of geography .
There’s a rot in this competition. There’s no parity .
S