Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

[cochise]

Not sure if this is correct, but on the ABC this afternoon they said that Grant does not have a contract with Storms for next year but has an option in his favour.

Interesting comments in Bellamy's post-match presser.

When asked about Harry being 100% back next season, he couldn't say that - mentioned waiting for Cam Smith, and that Harry is more likely than not to be back, but definitely not 100%. Some chance there...

RE JAC, as per info already on the forum - they want something we're not willing to give. If it doesn't get sorted this coming week, it will wait till the end of their finals campaign.


Really not concerned about JAC at this stage.
Another player wanting extra $ when he has not proven himself at a position.
Offer has been on the table but like Mitchell it won;t happen.

He can't take the offer at this point in time as he is signed for next year.


Well simple let him play out his contract next year with the storm, all the Media around it think its a formality

Where in the media does it say its a formality?


So what happened with my posts censored i assume?
Entertaining banter from 2 supporters both annoyed about tonights performance.

Disguised swearing breeches forum rules.

In regards to you arguments the press is not stating its a formality, the Storm want a replacement player before releasing JAC. They say if they don't get it then he will be in Melbourne nest year.

Fair enough if you could spell Breach ???
I could not care less what the press state most if if is made up to sell quotas.

As I said all good banter cheers moderator!!!

Seriously, resorting to picking up spelling errors lol. You were the one that said said the media was saying it was a formality? Now you don't care what they say, seems kind of pointless raising it in the first place then.

 

[Tigerbuck63]

Not sure if this is correct, but on the ABC this afternoon they said that Grant does not have a contract with Storms for next year but has an option in his favour.

Interesting comments in Bellamy's post-match presser.

When asked about Harry being 100% back next season, he couldn't say that - mentioned waiting for Cam Smith, and that Harry is more likely than not to be back, but definitely not 100%. Some chance there...

RE JAC, as per info already on the forum - they want something we're not willing to give. If it doesn't get sorted this coming week, it will wait till the end of their finals campaign.


Really not concerned about JAC at this stage.
Another player wanting extra $ when he has not proven himself at a position.
Offer has been on the table but like Mitchell it won;t happen.

He can't take the offer at this point in time as he is signed for next year.


Well simple let him play out his contract next year with the storm, all the Media around it think its a formality

Where in the media does it say its a formality?


So what happened with my posts censored i assume?
Entertaining banter from 2 supporters both annoyed about tonights performance.

Disguised swearing breeches forum rules.

In regards to you arguments the press is not stating its a formality, the Storm want a replacement player before releasing JAC. They say if they don't get it then he will be in Melbourne nest year.

Fair enough if you could spell Breach ???
I could not care less what the press state most if if is made up to sell quotas.

As I said all good banter cheers moderator!!!

Seriously, resorting to picking up spelling errors lol. You were the one that said said the media was saying it was a formality? Now you don't care what they say, seems kind of pointless raising it in the first place then.

Well you stated the swap deal about getting a replacement but stated you had heard nothing in the media? Censor that point as well your starting to sound like your not impartial which is what this forum is about sure you don’t work for the tigers ???

 

[cochise]

Not sure if this is correct, but on the ABC this afternoon they said that Grant does not have a contract with Storms for next year but has an option in his favour.

Interesting comments in Bellamy's post-match presser.

When asked about Harry being 100% back next season, he couldn't say that - mentioned waiting for Cam Smith, and that Harry is more likely than not to be back, but definitely not 100%. Some chance there...

RE JAC, as per info already on the forum - they want something we're not willing to give. If it doesn't get sorted this coming week, it will wait till the end of their finals campaign.


Really not concerned about JAC at this stage.
Another player wanting extra $ when he has not proven himself at a position.
Offer has been on the table but like Mitchell it won;t happen.

He can't take the offer at this point in time as he is signed for next year.


Well simple let him play out his contract next year with the storm, all the Media around it think its a formality

Where in the media does it say its a formality?


So what happened with my posts censored i assume?
Entertaining banter from 2 supporters both annoyed about tonights performance.

Disguised swearing breeches forum rules.

In regards to you arguments the press is not stating its a formality, the Storm want a replacement player before releasing JAC. They say if they don't get it then he will be in Melbourne nest year.

Fair enough if you could spell Breach ???
I could not care less what the press state most if if is made up to sell quotas.

As I said all good banter cheers moderator!!!

Seriously, resorting to picking up spelling errors lol. You were the one that said said the media was saying it was a formality? Now you don't care what they say, seems kind of pointless raising it in the first place then.

Well you stated the swap deal about getting a replacement but stated you had heard nothing in the media? Censor that point as well your starting to sound like your not impartial which is what this forum is about sure you don’t work for the tigers ???

I didn't state that I heard nothing in the media until you claimed the media said it was a formality, so I said I hadn't heard that in the media. I'm actually usually one of the people critical of the club, but the club can not sign someone who is contracted for next year.

It is you're by the way ;p

 

[Tigerbuck63]

Not sure if this is correct, but on the ABC this afternoon they said that Grant does not have a contract with Storms for next year but has an option in his favour.

Interesting comments in Bellamy's post-match presser.

When asked about Harry being 100% back next season, he couldn't say that - mentioned waiting for Cam Smith, and that Harry is more likely than not to be back, but definitely not 100%. Some chance there...

RE JAC, as per info already on the forum - they want something we're not willing to give. If it doesn't get sorted this coming week, it will wait till the end of their finals campaign.


Really not concerned about JAC at this stage.
Another player wanting extra $ when he has not proven himself at a position.
Offer has been on the table but like Mitchell it won;t happen.

He can't take the offer at this point in time as he is signed for next year.


Well simple let him play out his contract next year with the storm, all the Media around it think its a formality

Where in the media does it say its a formality?


So what happened with my posts censored i assume?
Entertaining banter from 2 supporters both annoyed about tonights performance.

Disguised swearing breeches forum rules.

In regards to you arguments the press is not stating its a formality, the Storm want a replacement player before releasing JAC. They say if they don't get it then he will be in Melbourne nest year.

Fair enough if you could spell Breach ???
I could not care less what the press state most if if is made up to sell quotas.

As I said all good banter cheers moderator!!!

Seriously, resorting to picking up spelling errors lol. You were the one that said said the media was saying it was a formality? Now you don't care what they say, seems kind of pointless raising it in the first place then.

Well you stated the swap deal about getting a replacement but stated you had heard nothing in the media? Censor that point as well your starting to sound like your not impartial which is what this forum is about sure you don’t work for the tigers ???

I didn't state that I heard nothing in the media until you claimed the media said it was a formality, so I said I hadn't heard that in the media. I'm actually usually one of the people critical of the club, but the club can not sign someone who is contracted for next year.

It is you're by the way ;p

Well the good thing about next week is I don’t need to listen to your dribble anymore.
Nor have my posts censored lol

 

[cochise]

Not sure if this is correct, but on the ABC this afternoon they said that Grant does not have a contract with Storms for next year but has an option in his favour.

Interesting comments in Bellamy's post-match presser.

When asked about Harry being 100% back next season, he couldn't say that - mentioned waiting for Cam Smith, and that Harry is more likely than not to be back, but definitely not 100%. Some chance there...

RE JAC, as per info already on the forum - they want something we're not willing to give. If it doesn't get sorted this coming week, it will wait till the end of their finals campaign.


Really not concerned about JAC at this stage.
Another player wanting extra $ when he has not proven himself at a position.
Offer has been on the table but like Mitchell it won;t happen.

He can't take the offer at this point in time as he is signed for next year.


Well simple let him play out his contract next year with the storm, all the Media around it think its a formality

Where in the media does it say its a formality?


So what happened with my posts censored i assume?
Entertaining banter from 2 supporters both annoyed about tonights performance.

Disguised swearing breeches forum rules.

In regards to you arguments the press is not stating its a formality, the Storm want a replacement player before releasing JAC. They say if they don't get it then he will be in Melbourne nest year.

Fair enough if you could spell Breach ???
I could not care less what the press state most if if is made up to sell quotas.

As I said all good banter cheers moderator!!!

Seriously, resorting to picking up spelling errors lol. You were the one that said said the media was saying it was a formality? Now you don't care what they say, seems kind of pointless raising it in the first place then.

Well you stated the swap deal about getting a replacement but stated you had heard nothing in the media? Censor that point as well your starting to sound like your not impartial which is what this forum is about sure you don’t work for the tigers ???

I didn't state that I heard nothing in the media until you claimed the media said it was a formality, so I said I hadn't heard that in the media. I'm actually usually one of the people critical of the club, but the club can not sign someone who is contracted for next year.

It is you're by the way ;p

Well the good thing about next week is I don’t need to listen to your dribble anymore.
Nor have my posts censored lol

The foe feature might work well for you.

Who would you like the club to sign for next year?

 

[Tigerbuck63]

Not sure if this is correct, but on the ABC this afternoon they said that Grant does not have a contract with Storms for next year but has an option in his favour.

Interesting comments in Bellamy's post-match presser.

When asked about Harry being 100% back next season, he couldn't say that - mentioned waiting for Cam Smith, and that Harry is more likely than not to be back, but definitely not 100%. Some chance there...

RE JAC, as per info already on the forum - they want something we're not willing to give. If it doesn't get sorted this coming week, it will wait till the end of their finals campaign.


Really not concerned about JAC at this stage.
Another player wanting extra $ when he has not proven himself at a position.
Offer has been on the table but like Mitchell it won;t happen.

He can't take the offer at this point in time as he is signed for next year.


Well simple let him play out his contract next year with the storm, all the Media around it think its a formality

Where in the media does it say its a formality?


So what happened with my posts censored i assume?
Entertaining banter from 2 supporters both annoyed about tonights performance.

Disguised swearing breeches forum rules.

In regards to you arguments the press is not stating its a formality, the Storm want a replacement player before releasing JAC. They say if they don't get it then he will be in Melbourne nest year.

Fair enough if you could spell Breach ???
I could not care less what the press state most if if is made up to sell quotas.

As I said all good banter cheers moderator!!!

Seriously, resorting to picking up spelling errors lol. You were the one that said said the media was saying it was a formality? Now you don't care what they say, seems kind of pointless raising it in the first place then.

Well you stated the swap deal about getting a replacement but stated you had heard nothing in the media? Censor that point as well your starting to sound like your not impartial which is what this forum is about sure you don’t work for the tigers ???

I didn't state that I heard nothing in the media until you claimed the media said it was a formality, so I said I hadn't heard that in the media. I'm actually usually one of the people critical of the club, but the club can not sign someone who is contracted for next year.

It is you're by the way ;p

Well the good thing about next week is I don’t need to listen to your dribble anymore.
Nor have my posts censored lol

The foe feature might work well for you.

Who would you like the club to sign for next year?

In all honesty there is not much talent available on the market next season unless players want to break contracts which personally I don’t agree with as clubs can’t off load dud signing?

Tamou on reasonable $ good Signing.
Need a whole new spine and some mongrel in our forwards. JAC 50/50 not sure really wants to play for us rather play for Souths.

Maybe a few fringe panthers players if they are looking for an opportunity to play regular 1st grade like Grant did this season.

 

[cochise]

Not sure if this is correct, but on the ABC this afternoon they said that Grant does not have a contract with Storms for next year but has an option in his favour.

Interesting comments in Bellamy's post-match presser.

When asked about Harry being 100% back next season, he couldn't say that - mentioned waiting for Cam Smith, and that Harry is more likely than not to be back, but definitely not 100%. Some chance there...

RE JAC, as per info already on the forum - they want something we're not willing to give. If it doesn't get sorted this coming week, it will wait till the end of their finals campaign.


Really not concerned about JAC at this stage.
Another player wanting extra $ when he has not proven himself at a position.
Offer has been on the table but like Mitchell it won;t happen.

He can't take the offer at this point in time as he is signed for next year.


Well simple let him play out his contract next year with the storm, all the Media around it think its a formality

Where in the media does it say its a formality?


So what happened with my posts censored i assume?
Entertaining banter from 2 supporters both annoyed about tonights performance.

Disguised swearing breeches forum rules.

In regards to you arguments the press is not stating its a formality, the Storm want a replacement player before releasing JAC. They say if they don't get it then he will be in Melbourne nest year.

Fair enough if you could spell Breach ???
I could not care less what the press state most if if is made up to sell quotas.

As I said all good banter cheers moderator!!!

Seriously, resorting to picking up spelling errors lol. You were the one that said said the media was saying it was a formality? Now you don't care what they say, seems kind of pointless raising it in the first place then.

Well you stated the swap deal about getting a replacement but stated you had heard nothing in the media? Censor that point as well your starting to sound like your not impartial which is what this forum is about sure you don’t work for the tigers ???

I didn't state that I heard nothing in the media until you claimed the media said it was a formality, so I said I hadn't heard that in the media. I'm actually usually one of the people critical of the club, but the club can not sign someone who is contracted for next year.

It is you're by the way ;p

Well the good thing about next week is I don’t need to listen to your dribble anymore.
Nor have my posts censored lol

The foe feature might work well for you.

Who would you like the club to sign for next year?

In all honesty there is not much talent available on the market next season unless players want to break contracts which personally I don’t agree with as clubs can’t off load dud signing?

Tamou on reasonable $ good Signing.
Need a whole new spine and some mongrel in our forwards. JAC 50/50 not sure really wants to play for us rather play for Souths.

Maybe a few fringe panthers players if they are looking for an opportunity to play regular 1st grade like Grant did this season.

I was quite concerned at the Tamou signing until I heard the clubs reasons for signing him. I think Liddle will do well at hooker if he can stay healthy and the new rules should suit him. We are incredibly weak in the halves and at fullback, with what we have Mbye has to spend the entire offseason under the highball and Doueihi into the centres. I would love at least one half but there is none available. We really lack that devastating high impact runner but it appears the club is not looking for that at the moment.

 

[Tigerbuck63]

Not sure if this is correct, but on the ABC this afternoon they said that Grant does not have a contract with Storms for next year but has an option in his favour.

Interesting comments in Bellamy's post-match presser.

When asked about Harry being 100% back next season, he couldn't say that - mentioned waiting for Cam Smith, and that Harry is more likely than not to be back, but definitely not 100%. Some chance there...

RE JAC, as per info already on the forum - they want something we're not willing to give. If it doesn't get sorted this coming week, it will wait till the end of their finals campaign.


Really not concerned about JAC at this stage.
Another player wanting extra $ when he has not proven himself at a position.
Offer has been on the table but like Mitchell it won;t happen.

He can't take the offer at this point in time as he is signed for next year.


Well simple let him play out his contract next year with the storm, all the Media around it think its a formality

Where in the media does it say its a formality?


So what happened with my posts censored i assume?
Entertaining banter from 2 supporters both annoyed about tonights performance.

Disguised swearing breeches forum rules.

In regards to you arguments the press is not stating its a formality, the Storm want a replacement player before releasing JAC. They say if they don't get it then he will be in Melbourne nest year.

Fair enough if you could spell Breach ???
I could not care less what the press state most if if is made up to sell quotas.

As I said all good banter cheers moderator!!!

Seriously, resorting to picking up spelling errors lol. You were the one that said said the media was saying it was a formality? Now you don't care what they say, seems kind of pointless raising it in the first place then.

Well you stated the swap deal about getting a replacement but stated you had heard nothing in the media? Censor that point as well your starting to sound like your not impartial which is what this forum is about sure you don’t work for the tigers ???

I didn't state that I heard nothing in the media until you claimed the media said it was a formality, so I said I hadn't heard that in the media. I'm actually usually one of the people critical of the club, but the club can not sign someone who is contracted for next year.

It is you're by the way ;p

Well the good thing about next week is I don’t need to listen to your dribble anymore.
Nor have my posts censored lol

The foe feature might work well for you.

Who would you like the club to sign for next year?

In all honesty there is not much talent available on the market next season unless players want to break contracts which personally I don’t agree with as clubs can’t off load dud signing?

Tamou on reasonable $ good Signing.
Need a whole new spine and some mongrel in our forwards. JAC 50/50 not sure really wants to play for us rather play for Souths.

Maybe a few fringe panthers players if they are looking for an opportunity to play regular 1st grade like Grant did this season.

I was quite concerned at the Tamou signing until I heard the clubs reasons for signing him. I think Liddle will do well at hooker if he can stay healthy and the new rules should suit him. We are incredibly weak in the halves and at fullback, with what we have Mbye has to spend the entire offseason under the highball and Doueihi into the centres. I would love at least one half but there is none available. We really lack that devastating high impact runner but it appears the club is not looking for that at the moment.

Like too see how Brooks plays with Marshall hogging the ball?
If can’t perform move on ASAP.
Mybe don’t rate him much and certainly not captain material on the field, but has played better at fullback prior weeks,
AD a centre swap for BJ and put him in the forwards when mono returns.
It’s really a very unstable squad that Madge has given most weeks with alsolast minute changes.
Real lack of depth shows.
Biggest problem our starts and coaching failed to rectify all season???
Don’t mind losing as long as perform tonight we showed nothing worthy of who we are??
I do ? The coach as well starting to think all bluff but have to be fair with whom he has currently.
Backwards this season with having a loan player as our best performer!!

 

[cochise]

Not sure if this is correct, but on the ABC this afternoon they said that Grant does not have a contract with Storms for next year but has an option in his favour.

Interesting comments in Bellamy's post-match presser.

When asked about Harry being 100% back next season, he couldn't say that - mentioned waiting for Cam Smith, and that Harry is more likely than not to be back, but definitely not 100%. Some chance there...

RE JAC, as per info already on the forum - they want something we're not willing to give. If it doesn't get sorted this coming week, it will wait till the end of their finals campaign.


Really not concerned about JAC at this stage.
Another player wanting extra $ when he has not proven himself at a position.
Offer has been on the table but like Mitchell it won;t happen.

He can't take the offer at this point in time as he is signed for next year.


Well simple let him play out his contract next year with the storm, all the Media around it think its a formality

Where in the media does it say its a formality?


So what happened with my posts censored i assume?
Entertaining banter from 2 supporters both annoyed about tonights performance.

Disguised swearing breeches forum rules.

In regards to you arguments the press is not stating its a formality, the Storm want a replacement player before releasing JAC. They say if they don't get it then he will be in Melbourne nest year.

Fair enough if you could spell Breach ???
I could not care less what the press state most if if is made up to sell quotas.

As I said all good banter cheers moderator!!!

Seriously, resorting to picking up spelling errors lol. You were the one that said said the media was saying it was a formality? Now you don't care what they say, seems kind of pointless raising it in the first place then.

Well you stated the swap deal about getting a replacement but stated you had heard nothing in the media? Censor that point as well your starting to sound like your not impartial which is what this forum is about sure you don’t work for the tigers ???

I didn't state that I heard nothing in the media until you claimed the media said it was a formality, so I said I hadn't heard that in the media. I'm actually usually one of the people critical of the club, but the club can not sign someone who is contracted for next year.

It is you're by the way ;p

Well the good thing about next week is I don’t need to listen to your dribble anymore.
Nor have my posts censored lol

The foe feature might work well for you.

Who would you like the club to sign for next year?

In all honesty there is not much talent available on the market next season unless players want to break contracts which personally I don’t agree with as clubs can’t off load dud signing?

Tamou on reasonable $ good Signing.
Need a whole new spine and some mongrel in our forwards. JAC 50/50 not sure really wants to play for us rather play for Souths.

Maybe a few fringe panthers players if they are looking for an opportunity to play regular 1st grade like Grant did this season.

I was quite concerned at the Tamou signing until I heard the clubs reasons for signing him. I think Liddle will do well at hooker if he can stay healthy and the new rules should suit him. We are incredibly weak in the halves and at fullback, with what we have Mbye has to spend the entire offseason under the highball and Doueihi into the centres. I would love at least one half but there is none available. We really lack that devastating high impact runner but it appears the club is not looking for that at the moment.

Like too see how Brooks plays with Marshall hogging the ball?
If can’t perform move on ASAP.
Mybe don’t rate him much and certainly not captain material on the field, but has played better at fullback prior weeks,
AD a centre swap for BJ and put him in the forwards when mono returns.
It’s really a very unstable squad that Madge has given most weeks with alsolast minute changes.
Real lack of depth shows.
Biggest problem our starts and coaching failed to rectify all season???
Don’t mind losing as long as perform tonight we showed nothing worthy of who we are??
I do ? The coach as well starting to think all bluff but have to be fair with whom he has currently.
Backwards this season with having a loan player as our best performer!!

It does appear that Madge needs certain types players to be successful, I don't think he is a coach that adapts well to allow him to change his style for the players he has. Hopefully he can attract the type of players he needs.

 

[Tigerbuck63]

Not sure if this is correct, but on the ABC this afternoon they said that Grant does not have a contract with Storms for next year but has an option in his favour.

Interesting comments in Bellamy's post-match presser.

When asked about Harry being 100% back next season, he couldn't say that - mentioned waiting for Cam Smith, and that Harry is more likely than not to be back, but definitely not 100%. Some chance there...

RE JAC, as per info already on the forum - they want something we're not willing to give. If it doesn't get sorted this coming week, it will wait till the end of their finals campaign.


Really not concerned about JAC at this stage.
Another player wanting extra $ when he has not proven himself at a position.
Offer has been on the table but like Mitchell it won;t happen.

He can't take the offer at this point in time as he is signed for next year.


Well simple let him play out his contract next year with the storm, all the Media around it think its a formality

Where in the media does it say its a formality?


So what happened with my posts censored i assume?
Entertaining banter from 2 supporters both annoyed about tonights performance.

Disguised swearing breeches forum rules.

In regards to you arguments the press is not stating its a formality, the Storm want a replacement player before releasing JAC. They say if they don't get it then he will be in Melbourne nest year.

Fair enough if you could spell Breach ???
I could not care less what the press state most if if is made up to sell quotas.

As I said all good banter cheers moderator!!!

Seriously, resorting to picking up spelling errors lol. You were the one that said said the media was saying it was a formality? Now you don't care what they say, seems kind of pointless raising it in the first place then.

Well you stated the swap deal about getting a replacement but stated you had heard nothing in the media? Censor that point as well your starting to sound like your not impartial which is what this forum is about sure you don’t work for the tigers ???

I didn't state that I heard nothing in the media until you claimed the media said it was a formality, so I said I hadn't heard that in the media. I'm actually usually one of the people critical of the club, but the club can not sign someone who is contracted for next year.

It is you're by the way ;p

Well the good thing about next week is I don’t need to listen to your dribble anymore.
Nor have my posts censored lol

The foe feature might work well for you.

Who would you like the club to sign for next year?

In all honesty there is not much talent available on the market next season unless players want to break contracts which personally I don’t agree with as clubs can’t off load dud signing?

Tamou on reasonable $ good Signing.
Need a whole new spine and some mongrel in our forwards. JAC 50/50 not sure really wants to play for us rather play for Souths.

Maybe a few fringe panthers players if they are looking for an opportunity to play regular 1st grade like Grant did this season.

I was quite concerned at the Tamou signing until I heard the clubs reasons for signing him. I think Liddle will do well at hooker if he can stay healthy and the new rules should suit him. We are incredibly weak in the halves and at fullback, with what we have Mbye has to spend the entire offseason under the highball and Doueihi into the centres. I would love at least one half but there is none available. We really lack that devastating high impact runner but it appears the club is not looking for that at the moment.

Like too see how Brooks plays with Marshall hogging the ball?
If can’t perform move on ASAP.
Mybe don’t rate him much and certainly not captain material on the field, but has played better at fullback prior weeks,
AD a centre swap for BJ and put him in the forwards when mono returns.
It’s really a very unstable squad that Madge has given most weeks with alsolast minute changes.
Real lack of depth shows.
Biggest problem our starts and coaching failed to rectify all season???
Don’t mind losing as long as perform tonight we showed nothing worthy of who we are??
I do ? The coach as well starting to think all bluff but have to be fair with whom he has currently.
Backwards this season with having a loan player as our best performer!!

It does appear that Madge needs certain types players to be successful, I don't think he is a coach that adapts well to allow him to change his style for the players he has. Hopefully he can attract the type of players he needs.

Talking about D all season and giving away 50
Is a reflection of the coach and his selections?
I would not have played Reynolds tonight??
Coaches should be adaptable Holbrook has worked well with under performing players

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Staines, JAC, Tamou, Hetherington are all must have players.

 

[JC99]

Not sure if this is correct, but on the ABC this afternoon they said that Grant does not have a contract with Storms for next year but has an option in his favour.

Interesting comments in Bellamy's post-match presser.

When asked about Harry being 100% back next season, he couldn't say that - mentioned waiting for Cam Smith, and that Harry is more likely than not to be back, but definitely not 100%. Some chance there...

RE JAC, as per info already on the forum - they want something we're not willing to give. If it doesn't get sorted this coming week, it will wait till the end of their finals campaign.


Really not concerned about JAC at this stage.
Another player wanting extra $ when he has not proven himself at a position.
Offer has been on the table but like Mitchell it won;t happen.

He can't take the offer at this point in time as he is signed for next year.


Well simple let him play out his contract next year with the storm, all the Media around it think its a formality

Where in the media does it say its a formality?


So what happened with my posts censored i assume?
Entertaining banter from 2 supporters both annoyed about tonights performance.

Disguised swearing breeches forum rules.

In regards to you arguments the press is not stating its a formality, the Storm want a replacement player before releasing JAC. They say if they don't get it then he will be in Melbourne nest year.

Fair enough if you could spell Breach ???
I could not care less what the press state most if if is made up to sell quotas.

As I said all good banter cheers moderator!!!

Seriously, resorting to picking up spelling errors lol. You were the one that said said the media was saying it was a formality? Now you don't care what they say, seems kind of pointless raising it in the first place then.

Well you stated the swap deal about getting a replacement but stated you had heard nothing in the media? Censor that point as well your starting to sound like your not impartial which is what this forum is about sure you don’t work for the tigers ???

I didn't state that I heard nothing in the media until you claimed the media said it was a formality, so I said I hadn't heard that in the media. I'm actually usually one of the people critical of the club, but the club can not sign someone who is contracted for next year.

It is you're by the way ;p

Well the good thing about next week is I don’t need to listen to your dribble anymore.
Nor have my posts censored lol

The foe feature might work well for you.

Who would you like the club to sign for next year?

In all honesty there is not much talent available on the market next season unless players want to break contracts which personally I don’t agree with as clubs can’t off load dud signing?

Tamou on reasonable $ good Signing.
Need a whole new spine and some mongrel in our forwards. JAC 50/50 not sure really wants to play for us rather play for Souths.

Maybe a few fringe panthers players if they are looking for an opportunity to play regular 1st grade like Grant did this season.

I was quite concerned at the Tamou signing until I heard the clubs reasons for signing him. I think Liddle will do well at hooker if he can stay healthy and the new rules should suit him. We are incredibly weak in the halves and at fullback, with what we have Mbye has to spend the entire offseason under the highball and Doueihi into the centres. I would love at least one half but there is none available. We really lack that devastating high impact runner but it appears the club is not looking for that at the moment.

Like too see how Brooks plays with Marshall hogging the ball?
If can’t perform move on ASAP.
Mybe don’t rate him much and certainly not captain material on the field, but has played better at fullback prior weeks,
AD a centre swap for BJ and put him in the forwards when mono returns.
It’s really a very unstable squad that Madge has given most weeks with alsolast minute changes.
Real lack of depth shows.
Biggest problem our starts and coaching failed to rectify all season???
Don’t mind losing as long as perform tonight we showed nothing worthy of who we are??
I do ? The coach as well starting to think all bluff but have to be fair with whom he has currently.
Backwards this season with having a loan player as our best performer!!

It does appear that Madge needs certain types players to be successful, I don't think he is a coach that adapts well to allow him to change his style for the players he has. Hopefully he can attract the type of players he needs.

Talking about D all season and giving away 50
Is a reflection of the coach and his selections?
I would not have played Reynolds tonight??
Coaches should be adaptable Holbrook has worked well with under performing players

You’d rather have Madden? The blokes tiny they would’ve had Nelson run at him game. Reynolds didn’t play well but he made his tackles most
Of the time.

 

[supercoach]

We are like the RSPCA we desperately need to find homes for most our big contract players. Grub,Packer, MM and BJ come to mind

 

[the_third]

The person we need most next year is Craig Fitzgibbon (current Roosters defensive coach).

Hynes or Staines at fullback, JAC on the left wing and we have a decent team

He’s the next roosters coach. Robinson a chance to move to France

 

[facepalmer]

Given we're getting Momo back I'd say sending Talau down there as a loan player is a pretty good idea tbh.

 

[Tcat]

No way to we loan Nofa to Melbourne. Why would we do this, he's one of our most lethal attacking weapons. I don't care if he comes back in a year, no no no. The logical idea would be to loan them Talau and let him learn down the storm. Screw Melbourne, they are a club that's rarely struggled. Hold strong on this one Madge.

 

[JC99]

Given we're getting Momo back I'd say sending Talau down there as a loan player is a pretty good idea tbh.

It’s an excellent idea

 

[the_third]

Aloai injured means we need another prop that will run for 100m.

 

[Geo]

Aloai injured means we need another prop that will run for 100m.

No need A Prop that can run 100m...2 would be unrealistic

 

[Deleted member 3518]

Talau. Would be great experience for him. We would still have Nofo and JAC for the year and there’s no doubt he would come back a far better player.

Win, win.

Yep , I’m fine with a loan . If it’s because there is a huge void that needs filling at the storm , then help them for the year .