avocadoontoast
Well-known member
@twentyforty said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299605) said:hould we be in the race for his signature on a short term deal?
Nope. Fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@twentyforty said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299605) said:hould we be in the race for his signature on a short term deal?
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299616) said:@twentyforty said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299605) said:hould we be in the race for his signature on a short term deal?
Nope. Fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me.
@strongee said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299618) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299616) said:@twentyforty said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299605) said:hould we be in the race for his signature on a short term deal?
Nope. Fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me.
Bet you the 4 clubs not chasing him , are the storm , roosters ,Penrith and us .
The riff don’t need him and his drama . And the other 2 are too smart for that . And I think we’ve learnt our lesson .
@jadtiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299601) said:@spartan117 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299598) said:@the_pom said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299215) said:That’s 100% correct no formal offer was put forward to McInnes or his management, catch up was to gage exactly where he was at & his thoughts on playing position which at the time was Hooker or nothing else hence discussions didn’t really eventuate further.
Seems McInnes has had a re-think on his Hooker stance.
**The Tigers should have been smarter.**
**The Club Should rethink the publicity associated with public meetings.**
This would avoid sensationalist stories being published and leaving the our club again looking like it took a yet another blow in the recruitment market.
There is no better way to evaluate someone and each others intentions than a face to face meeting,phone calls emails etc just dont give you that information
@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299616) said:@twentyforty said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299605) said:hould we be in the race for his signature on a short term deal?
Nope. Fool me once, shame on you. fool me twice, shame on me.
@newtown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299611) said:Latrell linked to 'sleeping giant' after Souths snub
WWOS staff 2 hrs ago
The Courier Mail reports the Rabbitohs offered Mitchell a three-year deal but it was knocked back by the club's management.
"I can confirm we've had some discussions with the Broncos," a spokesman for Mitchell's management told the Courier Mail.
"We spoke just prior to Christmas.
"At this stage, despite reports Latrell is a done deal at Souths, we haven't finalised anything.
"Souths have tried to put a deal together that will reflect Latrell's market value, but we've made it clear we aren't looking for a long-term deal."
While South Sydney remain confident of keeping Mitchell, the star's representative has received interest from at least 12 teams in the NRL, with the "When they aren't on top of the NRL, they are a sleeping giant and it is only a matter of time before they bounce back again. The Broncos are arguably the biggest brand in Australian sport."
Mitchell's move to fullback was under the microscope during the early stages of the transition, but he was clearly adapting well during the 2020 season despite suffering a hamstring injury that cut his year short.
From 14 games with South Sydney at fullback - Mitchell had 15 try-assists and 26 line breaks and looked more confident in executing his duties at the back.
Although injury issues held him back last year, the two-time premiership winner still believes his value is best served through a shorter deal, posing more of risk to his overall value on the market. Broncos being one of several suitors.
@twentyforty said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299605) said:@speed2burn said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299603) said:@elderslie_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299597) said:@speed2burn said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299595) said:@sleeve said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299594) said:Egan Butcher ? Looked for stats,not much there.And Hartigans showing an interest? Can someone tell me why?
I don't think he has even debuted yet, probably another one of those diamond in a roughie type signings. Nat butcher would be better.
Leave it to the experts Hartigan from the Rorters system and would have a good idea what he has to offer for the rest of us just keep pounding the keyboard
I'm a massive hartigan fan.
As much as I, like the rest of you, would like to know what the hell is going on.. ?I prefer that Harty and the rest of our recruitment & retention team don’t walk around with a megaphone ?
Apparently 12 clubs are chasing Latrell Mitchell? It’s rumoured that he has refused an $800k longer term contract at the Bunnies. Should we be in the race for his signature on a short term deal?
@spartan117 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299598) said:@the_pom said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299215) said:That’s 100% correct no formal offer was put forward to McInnes or his management, catch up was to gage exactly where he was at & his thoughts on playing position which at the time was Hooker or nothing else hence discussions didn’t really eventuate further.
Seems McInnes has had a re-think on his Hooker stance.
**The Tigers should have been smarter.**
**The Club Should rethink the publicity associated with public meetings.**
This would avoid sensationalist stories being published and leaving the our club again looking like it took a yet another blow in the recruitment market.
@elderslie_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299627) said:Easier said then done Managers are always looking for ways to push their players barrows the more people that are aware a player is looking around the better its called MARKET PRESSURE the more pressure the better the contract
@twentyforty said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299605) said:@speed2burn said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299603) said:@elderslie_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299597) said:@speed2burn said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299595) said:@sleeve said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299594) said:Egan Butcher ? Looked for stats,not much there.And Hartigans showing an interest? Can someone tell me why?
I don't think he has even debuted yet, probably another one of those diamond in a roughie type signings. Nat butcher would be better.
Leave it to the experts Hartigan from the Rorters system and would have a good idea what he has to offer for the rest of us just keep pounding the keyboard
I'm a massive hartigan fan.
As much as I, like the rest of you, would like to know what the hell is going on.. ?I prefer that Harty and the rest of our recruitment & retention team don’t walk around with a megaphone ?
Apparently 12 clubs are chasing Latrell Mitchell? It’s rumoured that he has refused an $800k longer term contract at the Bunnies. Should we be in the race for his signature on a short term deal?
@truetiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299624) said:I know that a lot of us are curious about who will play 13,but,I reckon Madge is no fool and the 13 is an important position to fill...Even though we havent recruited a known 13,Madge may have been working with one of our squad members to fill the void in 2021..
He is there everyday working with this squad and surely has had someone within that position readying for the trials or rnd1...
Who that player is,only Madge knows at this point in time...
I have faith in Madge to fill that void with an astute player...Who knows what may eventuate from the trial game(s).....
@spartan117 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299628) said:@elderslie_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299627) said:Easier said then done Managers are always looking for ways to push their players barrows the more people that are aware a player is looking around the better its called MARKET PRESSURE the more pressure the better the contract
I dont see the majority of the other clubs doing their recruitment so publicly.
The Cam McInness Cronulla is my case in point. Multiple meetings and an outcome and not a sniff in the papers.
@weststigerman said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299604) said:@spartan117 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299598) said:@the_pom said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299215) said:That’s 100% correct no formal offer was put forward to McInnes or his management, catch up was to gage exactly where he was at & his thoughts on playing position which at the time was Hooker or nothing else hence discussions didn’t really eventuate further.
Seems McInnes has had a re-think on his Hooker stance.
**The Tigers should have been smarter.**
**The Club Should rethink the publicity associated with public meetings.**
This would avoid sensationalist stories being published and leaving the our club again looking like it took a yet another blow in the recruitment market.
Been thinking that as well. Madge is very hands on but might make sense to let Hartigan do the public meetings, he’s a lot less recognisable.
@sleeve said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299632) said:@truetiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299624) said:I know that a lot of us are curious about who will play 13,but,I reckon Madge is no fool and the 13 is an important position to fill...Even though we havent recruited a known 13,Madge may have been working with one of our squad members to fill the void in 2021..
He is there everyday working with this squad and surely has had someone within that position readying for the trials or rnd1...
Who that player is,only Madge knows at this point in time...
I have faith in Madge to fill that void with an astute player...Who knows what may eventuate from the trial game(s).....
Agree,and i hope he has someone groomed for the fullback position as well.
@nelson said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299625) said:@newtown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299611) said:Latrell linked to 'sleeping giant' after Souths snub
WWOS staff 2 hrs ago
The Courier Mail reports the Rabbitohs offered Mitchell a three-year deal but it was knocked back by the club's management.
"I can confirm we've had some discussions with the Broncos," a spokesman for Mitchell's management told the Courier Mail.
"We spoke just prior to Christmas.
"At this stage, despite reports Latrell is a done deal at Souths, we haven't finalised anything.
"Souths have tried to put a deal together that will reflect Latrell's market value, but we've made it clear we aren't looking for a long-term deal."
While South Sydney remain confident of keeping Mitchell, the star's representative has received interest from at least 12 teams in the NRL, with the "When they aren't on top of the NRL, they are a sleeping giant and it is only a matter of time before they bounce back again. The Broncos are arguably the biggest brand in Australian sport."
Mitchell's move to fullback was under the microscope during the early stages of the transition, but he was clearly adapting well during the 2020 season despite suffering a hamstring injury that cut his year short.
From 14 games with South Sydney at fullback - Mitchell had 15 try-assists and 26 line breaks and looked more confident in executing his duties at the back.
Although injury issues held him back last year, the two-time premiership winner still believes his value is best served through a shorter deal, posing more of risk to his overall value on the market. Broncos being one of several suitors.
15 try assists and 26 linebreaks?!? I feel like I would have known about it if he'd made 26 linebreaks....According to NRL stats he made 3 linebreaks in his 14 games and had 11 try assists.
@newtown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299611) said:Latrell linked to 'sleeping giant' after Souths snub
WWOS staff 2 hrs ago
The Courier Mail reports the Rabbitohs offered Mitchell a three-year deal but it was knocked back by the club's management.
"I can confirm we've had some discussions with the Broncos," a spokesman for Mitchell's management told the Courier Mail.
"We spoke just prior to Christmas.
"At this stage, despite reports Latrell is a done deal at Souths, we haven't finalised anything.
"Souths have tried to put a deal together that will reflect Latrell's market value, but we've made it clear we aren't looking for a long-term deal."
While South Sydney remain confident of keeping Mitchell, the star's representative has received interest from at least 12 teams in the NRL, with the "When they aren't on top of the NRL, they are a sleeping giant and it is only a matter of time before they bounce back again. The Broncos are arguably the biggest brand in Australian sport."
Mitchell's move to fullback was under the microscope during the early stages of the transition, but he was clearly adapting well during the 2020 season despite suffering a hamstring injury that cut his year short.
From 14 games with South Sydney at fullback - Mitchell had 15 try-assists and 26 line breaks and looked more confident in executing his duties at the back.
Although injury issues held him back last year, the two-time premiership winner still believes his value is best served through a shorter deal, posing more of risk to his overall value on the market. Broncos being one of several suitors.
@sleeve said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299634) said:@weststigerman said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299604) said:@spartan117 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299598) said:@the_pom said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1299215) said:That’s 100% correct no formal offer was put forward to McInnes or his management, catch up was to gage exactly where he was at & his thoughts on playing position which at the time was Hooker or nothing else hence discussions didn’t really eventuate further.
Seems McInnes has had a re-think on his Hooker stance.
**The Tigers should have been smarter.**
**The Club Should rethink the publicity associated with public meetings.**
This would avoid sensationalist stories being published and leaving the our club again looking like it took a yet another blow in the recruitment market.
Been thinking that as well. Madge is very hands on but might make sense to let Hartigan do the public meetings, he’s a lot less recognisable.
Madge should just coach,and leave recruitment and statements to the experts,thats what they were brought to the club for,and it is working.