BAGNF05
Well-known member
@tigerwest said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1468512) said:@twentyforty said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1468497) said:@bagnf05 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1468478) said:@twentyforty said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1468456) said:@bagnf05 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1468417) said:@tony-soprano said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1468413) said:@bagnf05 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1468411) said:@tony-soprano said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1468408) said:How do we only have 4 spots left for next year that's scary
The fact we’re likely keeping Cini and Roberts is the club waiving the white flag in terms of recruitment
They have to say no to cini and amone.
Amone and Mikaele are the same. Bog average.
Both those players have shown signs they could develop into keepers. imo.
Waiting for some of our players to make a contribution is like leaving the porch light on for Harold Holt.
It is. The alternative is just as painful.
I hope we stop signing players over the age of 27 unless they’re already at the club.
Does anyone know who is responsible for the club’s contractual obligations with new players? Who is ultimately responsible for signing a new player?
As I understand it, Hartigan (after discussion with Madge) put forward a proposal to Pascoe and the board for sign off?
I seem to remember that that was a bit of an issue, because of some lag time in getting the green light?
Pretty sure this was brought about because of Ivan?
So the experts get approval from the pen pushers.