@pablox said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1512306) said:@jirskyr said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1512266) said:@tony-soprano said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1512255) said:@jirskyr said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1512254) said:@telltails said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1512250) said:@bigsiro said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1512248) said:@al-the-tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1512221) said:@isaaktigers said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1512175) said:Why’s everyone complaining?
They lost friend and cordner this year… they’re under the cap..
Yeah, when you consider those losses you'd like to think that they're under the cap. And then you look at the rest of their squad being littered with Origin players and internationals and you start to realise there is no way in hell that they're under the cap. Sure, they lost a few key players but that doesn't account for the fact that nearly every single player in their starting 13 is a rep level player. Can't believe there are people actually trying to vouch for the Roosters being under the cap just because they lost a few players.
Exactly. It’s laughable.
Its never about who they lose its about who they have got. They never lose players to stay under the cap they lose players that they no longer want or retire, and replace them with equally good ones or better.
Lose Pearce gain Cronk. Lose RTS gain Tedesco. Lose Friend gain Cheese. It's like a constant upgrade system but never seems to cost them any extra money.
In a decade or so the Roosters spine will be Jesus, Zeus, Hercules and Superman, and all 4 will claim they are playing for the chance of a premiership and the Roosters professionalism.
Would a draft stop this sort of thing?
Probably, but it has no legs in our sport. Also it's all short-term...you only have to look at the NBA to see that the draft does distribute talent, but soon enough money talks and the big-name players are drawn to whichever franchise is spending the big bucks at that time.
What I don't understand, is why people think a draft has no legs in the nrl?
I love the NBA, and the draft does distribute talent. That's why we see other teams make the play-offs.
Yes, you do get some big name players changing teams, but that's generally at the end of their career when they're chasing championships. But that doesn't always work out, last season was an example.
The Player's Association has time and time again stated they won't and will never agree to a draft in their collective bargaining agreement negotiations with the NRL. They took the game to court in the 90's over a draft proposal and won. The Player's Association claim it is a restriction of trade for their members (the players) and having won the court case previously on that basis, there's little to no chance that a draft would get up due to previous legal precedent.
A draft while evening up where good juniors go, restricts draftees being able to choose where they work and generally what they can earn as draft wages are generally set in stone in other sports.
In the American sports, a draft works due to athletes being developed in the High School and Collegiate sporting organisations. Even the AFL juniors is run over various state league competitions that aren't affiliated directly to the AFL clubs. That's not the case here where players are developed in the club system.
If you installed a draft in the NRL, there's no point in conducting Harold Matt's, SG Ball, Flegg etc as your junior talent aren't yours to keep. Why would you pay junior coaches to develop players? It's just not something that can be introduced for Rugby League.