Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

@stryker-69 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522520) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522519) said:
@stryker-69 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522417) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522300) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522223) said:
@eternal-tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522221) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522198) said:
@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522196) said:
Brooks hasnt been right for our past 3 coaches maybe the problem is brooks

He won halfback of the year under our previous coach… but don’t let facts get in the way.

Couldn’t this all go in one of the 17 Luke Brooks threads available?

Halfback of the Year for a team who came 9th. In 2018, Cronk had his debut year at Chooks and won a GF, Adam Reynolds got South's to Top 4 and Cleary debuted in Origin, but yeah Brooks was the best 7 in the Comp ???

He never said he was the best halfback that year, just that he was halfback of the year, which he was.

The anti Brooks brigade have become like the anti vax brigade. They aren’t interested in having rational conversation, they just want to scream in your face and dismiss any facts that don’t back their argument.

Which facts?
Any fact supports our stance that a lump of drift wood would perform better.
It amuses me that his only supporters in the whole NRL fan base are a tiny minority of Tigers men. Everyone else laughs at him trying to play.

I pointed out the FACT that Luke Brooks won halfback of the year under our previous coach, in reply to the comment that Brooks had a problem with the last 3 coaches.

You replied saying if I thought Brooks was the best halfback in the comp I knew nothing about the game.

Newcastle, a club who actually played finals this year want him. Andrew Johns wants him at the knights and believes they can make him a better player. Why can’t we?

I don’t know, why can’t we?
Many have tried, all have failed.



@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522519) said:
@stryker-69 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522417) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522300) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522223) said:
@eternal-tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522221) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522198) said:
@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522196) said:
Brooks hasnt been right for our past 3 coaches maybe the problem is brooks

He won halfback of the year under our previous coach… but don’t let facts get in the way.

Couldn’t this all go in one of the 17 Luke Brooks threads available?

Halfback of the Year for a team who came 9th. In 2018, Cronk had his debut year at Chooks and won a GF, Adam Reynolds got South's to Top 4 and Cleary debuted in Origin, but yeah Brooks was the best 7 in the Comp ???

He never said he was the best halfback that year, just that he was halfback of the year, which he was.

The anti Brooks brigade have become like the anti vax brigade. They aren’t interested in having rational conversation, they just want to scream in your face and dismiss any facts that don’t back their argument.

Which facts?
Any fact supports our stance that a lump of drift wood would perform better.
It amuses me that his only supporters in the whole NRL fan base are a tiny minority of Tigers men. Everyone else laughs at him trying to play.

I pointed out the FACT that Luke Brooks won halfback of the year under our previous coach, in reply to the comment that Brooks had a problem with the last 3 coaches.

You replied saying if I thought Brooks was the best halfback in the comp I knew nothing about the game.

Newcastle, a club who actually played finals this year want him. Andrew Johns wants him at the knights and believes they can make him a better player. Why can’t we?

I don’t know, why can’t we?
Many have tried and failed.

Lets look at Brooks:
When he first came with Voldemort, they became known as the Turnstyles. No defense and we were conceding tries in the middle.
What we have seen is Brooks up the ante in Defense, he has gotten a lot better.

Then Coach Voldemort punts Robbie Farah because he wants a hooker who will give good early ball to nr7. This never worked for us. It was said of Des Haslier that at the dogs he changed to adapt with the players strengths and we needed that. Well Coach Voldemort had one gameplan and one only punting Pat Richards who was playing the house down.

Brooks has had Sheens, Potter, Voldemort, Cleary, McGuire. On top of this Brett Kimmorley worked as a coaching assistant with us. All of them have tried different styles, many tried different hookers and it's the same.

Brooks is a great player, but poor halfback. He is a poor halfback because he won't organise or boss the team into position. Why? He isn't that guy! He is shy and humble. Maybe Johns can coach it into him, maybe not! We can't so stop putting the square peg into the round hole.

Hopefully Brooks gells with Hastings. Either they swap positions or Hastings steers the team from 5/8. It will take 5 rounds for us to see if this works or is a total failure, they will need time to Gel. It will also be hard because Madge is inflexible too and I am unsure how Brooks+Hastings+Madge will work together.

That said, by round 10 if Brooks and Hastings has't worked PUNT BROOKS. Let him go to the knights, England wherever. Our team needs structure.
 
@newtown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522564) said:
@spartan117 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522552) said:
All this is driving me crazy,

We need the season to get here and give us the data to make decisions to move our club forward and win games.

All these anti Brooks posters must dream about Brooks in their sleep.

My hope is that management are sandbagging an announcement about Utoikamanu till start of trials which should divert all the Brooks talk. His name gets easier to spell with practice and no I don't mean Brooks.
 
@crazycat said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522566) said:
@stryker-69 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522520) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522519) said:
@stryker-69 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522417) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522300) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522223) said:
@eternal-tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522221) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522198) said:
@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522196) said:
Brooks hasnt been right for our past 3 coaches maybe the problem is brooks

He won halfback of the year under our previous coach… but don’t let facts get in the way.

Couldn’t this all go in one of the 17 Luke Brooks threads available?

Halfback of the Year for a team who came 9th. In 2018, Cronk had his debut year at Chooks and won a GF, Adam Reynolds got South's to Top 4 and Cleary debuted in Origin, but yeah Brooks was the best 7 in the Comp ???

He never said he was the best halfback that year, just that he was halfback of the year, which he was.

The anti Brooks brigade have become like the anti vax brigade. They aren’t interested in having rational conversation, they just want to scream in your face and dismiss any facts that don’t back their argument.

Which facts?
Any fact supports our stance that a lump of drift wood would perform better.
It amuses me that his only supporters in the whole NRL fan base are a tiny minority of Tigers men. Everyone else laughs at him trying to play.

I pointed out the FACT that Luke Brooks won halfback of the year under our previous coach, in reply to the comment that Brooks had a problem with the last 3 coaches.

You replied saying if I thought Brooks was the best halfback in the comp I knew nothing about the game.

Newcastle, a club who actually played finals this year want him. Andrew Johns wants him at the knights and believes they can make him a better player. Why can’t we?

I don’t know, why can’t we?
Many have tried, all have failed.



@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522519) said:
@stryker-69 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522417) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522300) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522223) said:
@eternal-tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522221) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522198) said:
@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522196) said:
Brooks hasnt been right for our past 3 coaches maybe the problem is brooks

He won halfback of the year under our previous coach… but don’t let facts get in the way.

Couldn’t this all go in one of the 17 Luke Brooks threads available?

Halfback of the Year for a team who came 9th. In 2018, Cronk had his debut year at Chooks and won a GF, Adam Reynolds got South's to Top 4 and Cleary debuted in Origin, but yeah Brooks was the best 7 in the Comp ???

He never said he was the best halfback that year, just that he was halfback of the year, which he was.

The anti Brooks brigade have become like the anti vax brigade. They aren’t interested in having rational conversation, they just want to scream in your face and dismiss any facts that don’t back their argument.

Which facts?
Any fact supports our stance that a lump of drift wood would perform better.
It amuses me that his only supporters in the whole NRL fan base are a tiny minority of Tigers men. Everyone else laughs at him trying to play.

I pointed out the FACT that Luke Brooks won halfback of the year under our previous coach, in reply to the comment that Brooks had a problem with the last 3 coaches.

You replied saying if I thought Brooks was the best halfback in the comp I knew nothing about the game.

Newcastle, a club who actually played finals this year want him. Andrew Johns wants him at the knights and believes they can make him a better player. Why can’t we?

I don’t know, why can’t we?
Many have tried and failed.

Lets look at Brooks:
When he first came with Voldemort, they became known as the Turnstyles. No defense and we were conceding tries in the middle.
What we have seen is Brooks up the ante in Defense, he has gotten a lot better.

Then Coach Voldemort punts Robbie Farah because he wants a hooker who will give good early ball to nr7. This never worked for us. It was said of Des Haslier that at the dogs he changed to adapt with the players strengths and we needed that. Well Coach Voldemort had one gameplan and one only punting Pat Richards who was playing the house down.

Brooks has had Sheens, Potter, Voldemort, Cleary, McGuire. On top of this Brett Kimmorley worked as a coaching assistant with us. All of them have tried different styles, many tried different hookers and it's the same.

Brooks is a great player, but poor halfback. He is a poor halfback because he won't organise or boss the team into position. Why? He isn't that guy! He is shy and humble. Maybe Johns can coach it into him, maybe not! We can't so stop putting the square peg into the round hole.

Hopefully Brooks gells with Hastings. Either they swap positions or Hastings steers the team from 5/8. It will take 5 rounds for us to see if this works or is a total failure, they will need time to Gel. It will also be hard because Madge is inflexible too and I am unsure how Brooks+Hastings+Madge will work together.

That said, by round 10 if Brooks and Hastings has't worked PUNT BROOKS. Let him go to the knights, England wherever. Our team needs structure.

Is Voldemort Jason Taylor or Ivan at this point? I've lost track.
 
@newtown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522564) said:
@spartan117 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522552) said:
All this is driving me crazy,

We need the season to get here and give us the data to make decisions to move our club forward and win games.

All these anti Brooks posters must dream about Brooks in their sleep.

That brings visions of disturbing mind movies.
 
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522569) said:
@newtown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522564) said:
@spartan117 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522552) said:
All this is driving me crazy,

We need the season to get here and give us the data to make decisions to move our club forward and win games.

All these anti Brooks posters must dream about Brooks in their sleep.

That brings visions of disturbing mind movies.

High Anxiety?
 
@don_kershane said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522575) said:
@pawsandclaws1 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522569) said:
@newtown said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522564) said:
@spartan117 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522552) said:
All this is driving me crazy,

We need the season to get here and give us the data to make decisions to move our club forward and win games.

All these anti Brooks posters must dream about Brooks in their sleep.

That brings visions of disturbing mind movies.

High Anxiety?

Are we talking about Mel or Luke Brooks?
 
@earl said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522561) said:
@tony-soprano said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522559) said:
@jedi_tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522546) said:
Moses made semis
Tedesco made semis
Woods made semis

The problem is not all Brooks but our team, we have had a mixture of bad coaching / average players and some bad luck

If Brooks had moved to a Roosters or Parramatta he would have been playing semis too.
I don't see people bagging Douhie he also has not played semis since leaving souths, or Tamou he was grand finalist captain to not making the semis.
We need to keep upgrading our squad we are doing that

Bingo, Andrew Johns only 7 that could get average team to finals

I think he only won 2 premierships as well. Easily the best player I've ever seen. He could do it all.

Andrew Johns was the best player I have seen
 
@crazycat said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522566) said:
@stryker-69 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522520) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522519) said:
@stryker-69 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522417) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522300) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522223) said:
@eternal-tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522221) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522198) said:
@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522196) said:
Brooks hasnt been right for our past 3 coaches maybe the problem is brooks

He won halfback of the year under our previous coach… but don’t let facts get in the way.

Couldn’t this all go in one of the 17 Luke Brooks threads available?

Halfback of the Year for a team who came 9th. In 2018, Cronk had his debut year at Chooks and won a GF, Adam Reynolds got South's to Top 4 and Cleary debuted in Origin, but yeah Brooks was the best 7 in the Comp ???

He never said he was the best halfback that year, just that he was halfback of the year, which he was.

The anti Brooks brigade have become like the anti vax brigade. They aren’t interested in having rational conversation, they just want to scream in your face and dismiss any facts that don’t back their argument.

Which facts?
Any fact supports our stance that a lump of drift wood would perform better.
It amuses me that his only supporters in the whole NRL fan base are a tiny minority of Tigers men. Everyone else laughs at him trying to play.

I pointed out the FACT that Luke Brooks won halfback of the year under our previous coach, in reply to the comment that Brooks had a problem with the last 3 coaches.

You replied saying if I thought Brooks was the best halfback in the comp I knew nothing about the game.

Newcastle, a club who actually played finals this year want him. Andrew Johns wants him at the knights and believes they can make him a better player. Why can’t we?

I don’t know, why can’t we?
Many have tried, all have failed.



@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522519) said:
@stryker-69 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522417) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522300) said:
@gnr4life said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522223) said:
@eternal-tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522221) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522198) said:
@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522196) said:
Brooks hasnt been right for our past 3 coaches maybe the problem is brooks

He won halfback of the year under our previous coach… but don’t let facts get in the way.

Couldn’t this all go in one of the 17 Luke Brooks threads available?

Halfback of the Year for a team who came 9th. In 2018, Cronk had his debut year at Chooks and won a GF, Adam Reynolds got South's to Top 4 and Cleary debuted in Origin, but yeah Brooks was the best 7 in the Comp ???

He never said he was the best halfback that year, just that he was halfback of the year, which he was.

The anti Brooks brigade have become like the anti vax brigade. They aren’t interested in having rational conversation, they just want to scream in your face and dismiss any facts that don’t back their argument.

Which facts?
Any fact supports our stance that a lump of drift wood would perform better.
It amuses me that his only supporters in the whole NRL fan base are a tiny minority of Tigers men. Everyone else laughs at him trying to play.

I pointed out the FACT that Luke Brooks won halfback of the year under our previous coach, in reply to the comment that Brooks had a problem with the last 3 coaches.

You replied saying if I thought Brooks was the best halfback in the comp I knew nothing about the game.

Newcastle, a club who actually played finals this year want him. Andrew Johns wants him at the knights and believes they can make him a better player. Why can’t we?

I don’t know, why can’t we?
Many have tried and failed.

Lets look at Brooks:
When he first came with Voldemort, they became known as the Turnstyles. No defense and we were conceding tries in the middle.
What we have seen is Brooks up the ante in Defense, he has gotten a lot better.

Then Coach Voldemort punts Robbie Farah because he wants a hooker who will give good early ball to nr7. This never worked for us. It was said of Des Haslier that at the dogs he changed to adapt with the players strengths and we needed that. Well Coach Voldemort had one gameplan and one only punting Pat Richards who was playing the house down.

Brooks has had Sheens, Potter, Voldemort, Cleary, McGuire. On top of this Brett Kimmorley worked as a coaching assistant with us. All of them have tried different styles, many tried different hookers and it's the same.

Brooks is a great player, but poor halfback. He is a poor halfback because he won't organise or boss the team into position. Why? He isn't that guy! He is shy and humble. Maybe Johns can coach it into him, maybe not! We can't so stop putting the square peg into the round hole.

Hopefully Brooks gells with Hastings. Either they swap positions or Hastings steers the team from 5/8. It will take 5 rounds for us to see if this works or is a total failure, they will need time to Gel. It will also be hard because Madge is inflexible too and I am unsure how Brooks+Hastings+Madge will work together.

That said, by round 10 if Brooks and Hastings has't worked PUNT BROOKS. Let him go to the knights, England wherever. Our team needs structure.

Brooks was never coached by Sheens....
I don't care how many times it gets said here, Or by whom...
It just never happened!!
For the love of god - Please stop saying it....
 
@tomatosoup912 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522536) said:
Good lord what has happened to this place? I have lurked this forum for almost 20 years and I have never seen it so bad.

Was pretty excited to login and see 12 pages of new chat in the signing suggestions and rumours thread, thinking obviously some juicy transfer goss was underway. Instead it's 12 pages of an egotistical yelling contest about which judgemental perspective is the only possible opinion that anyone is allowed to contemplate. You aren't even debating you just keep stone wall repeating the same rhetoric over and over again.

Maybe we can start a "dick measuring" thread so you can all whip it out and fill these voids that you are so desperately trying to validate through these keyboard screaming matches. At least start a Luke Brooks, Jacob Liddle, Luciano thread and screech in there, let the rest of the forum members actually use the signings thread to get excited about potential squad development.

Yep agree …… sadly that’s the current state of affairs on this site. Most of value posters have baled.
 
@A Former User said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522525) said:
@cobarcats said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522480) said:
Brooks would be a better player if he just played a supportive role.
If someone makes a break you would have Laurie and Brooks backing up on either side.
A bit like Billy Smith and Graham Langlands.
The recent stats showing Brooks as a poor defender but didn't reflect he played more games.
It does highlight our edge defenders are not up to scratch because there were some notable players on that list that had poor defense but don't come under the same scrutiny because their teams had a better points differential. Lucy is going, does that mean someone like Garner gets more game time this year?
Personally I think we need another gun backrower who can tackle and be involved in set plays.
I know I'm going to get smashed here, however, a player like Ryan Matteson would be perfect. He and Papa would be lethal.
Is there someone out there available like him.

Well said Cobes . Brooks is a running 5/8 & Hastings I think will organize & direct play & let Brooks run free. The edges in D have been woeful for the Tigers putting too much pressure on the defenders outside them. Some posters here forget Thurston hid in defence at outside center all his playing days. The club obviously recognize Brooks D is better than Thurstons.
Every half ever to play the game had at least one weakness on the field with one exception...The Great Andrew Johns.

Thanks mate. I Absolutely agree you. Oh except for one thing, he can't fight ?
I'm sure if given time I could come up with several good half backs that have had average success at club level.
One player that comes to mind is Shaun Johnson.
A great little player. Let's look at him for a sec:
With Warriors during the
**2012 -2017 seasons**
* failed to make first week play-offs in 146 games
* did win Rookie Of The Year and Golden Boot Award
* 3 different coaches, McClellan, Elliott, Kearney
* played for All Stars and New Zealand nation team 70% success rate.
He did play in the qual final in 2018 and knocked out in first week against Panffers. Can't really rate that.
Brooks, yes has played more games without success but he has some similarities to Johnson.
Knockers will say Johnson is a dud as well but his representative efforts are awesome and the rosters he played had flaws. He also scored over 1100pts.
Did ok going to the sharks under Morris but they were knocked out 2019 and 2021in first week.
I'd would have loved to have a player like him in our team.
IMO, the club as a whole has been a shambles since post 2005 grand final. The front office, disjointed roster - bad recruiting, coaching debacles, players jumping ship, players under performing.
Of course a playmaker is going to cop it. Comes with the salary.
Andrew Johns would not want him at Newcastle if he was a dud!
Whilst Brooks remains, support our team, look for the positives like our new additions and stop getting so stressed. Be happy! ?
 
Can we just get off brooks and get back on track, I am sick of hearing about him , he’s staying get over it .
Now it looks that there will be no swap deal to send LL to the cowboys and us get one one there young forwards as the season is only 7 weeks away . Real shame was hoping this would happen , UNLESS someone has any update on the matter .
 
@strongee said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522544) said:
@eternal-tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522528) said:
@champ said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522521) said:
@eternal-tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522339) said:
@champ said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522337) said:
@eternal-tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522221) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522198) said:
@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522196) said:
Brooks hasnt been right for our past 3 coaches maybe the problem is brooks

He won halfback of the year under our previous coach… but don’t let facts get in the way.

Couldn’t this all go in one of the 17 Luke Brooks threads available?

Halfback of the Year for a team who came 9th. In 2018, Cronk had his debut year at Chooks and won a GF, Adam Reynolds got South's to Top 4 and Cleary debuted in Origin, but yeah Brooks was the best 7 in the Comp ???

Man you are salty! Did Brooksy steal your girlfriend or something?

No, she wouldn't leave me, im actually successful. I wouldn't and don't rate any 7 who has played 170 games and is yet to play in a Semi.
We all have different expectations of players....Champ

Well son, be careful because thats 170 more games than you have played! And if you are referring to being successful in dollar terms I doubt you earn $800k a year.........whoops 2 things to worry about now!🙂

??? I don't earn 800k a year.
I'm paid really well though and according to my talent and skill set. I haven't bluffed my employer into over paying me for years like Brooks has. If I get a 20 year function in my honour, I promise I have the nous to run through the banner properly, unlike your boy Brooks. Now jog on Champ

He hasn’t though ! He’s paid at or around someone of his skill set is paid ie. first grade halfbacks . Blake green was getting 550k in the end and he was on one leg when he signed the last couple of contracts . Townsend is another good example of the supply demand issue currently .
Just because you don’t value him at 800k doesn’t mean the market doesn’t . He’s a top 8 half . Sorry that’s just true . Does it mean he’s by definition an “800k” player . And what we all generally know that label to mean ? No it doesn’t . But the guy earns 800k because the market dictates he earns it . I guarantee you , that if the knights could take brooks right now at full freight they would have done it yesterday . Same for the raiders , bulldogs , cowboys , and arguably the sharks. the Rabbits and Warriors are going with the youth and Johnston , for what that’s worth , and the dragons are stuck with hunt , and now Mbye .
Like I said top 8 half .
The real issue isnt brooks or Townsend on 800k , but what the hell have we been doing for the last 20 years with halves development in Australia . How do we not have 100 benji Marshalls running around right now , or Jonathon Thurstons .
But you all see Brooks -800k NOT WORTH IT . Based on what metric ? He’d probably get more if he was on the open market . It’s the same reason houses went through the roof . Lack of supply in key suburbs. Is that shack down the road worth 700k ? Perfect world , no way ! But it is because someone is willing to pay it . It’s our perspective that’s failed to move not the value .

I think the problem everyone has is that he is NOT a Top 8 half. You're wrong.

Source: He's never played a finals game ever. Therefore he's never been in a Top 8 team, therefore he's never been a Top 8 half
 
@balmain-boy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522625) said:
If only we had some mods who could delete or move the posts about Brooks to another thread...

There’s no thread to move them to since the one about him was locked because everyone had to rant the same opinion day in, day out.
 
@camel2281 said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522624) said:
@strongee said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522544) said:
@eternal-tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522528) said:
@champ said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522521) said:
@eternal-tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522339) said:
@champ said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522337) said:
@eternal-tiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522221) said:
@bones said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522198) said:
@lee-s-fedora said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522196) said:
Brooks hasnt been right for our past 3 coaches maybe the problem is brooks

He won halfback of the year under our previous coach… but don’t let facts get in the way.

Couldn’t this all go in one of the 17 Luke Brooks threads available?

Halfback of the Year for a team who came 9th. In 2018, Cronk had his debut year at Chooks and won a GF, Adam Reynolds got South's to Top 4 and Cleary debuted in Origin, but yeah Brooks was the best 7 in the Comp ???

Man you are salty! Did Brooksy steal your girlfriend or something?

No, she wouldn't leave me, im actually successful. I wouldn't and don't rate any 7 who has played 170 games and is yet to play in a Semi.
We all have different expectations of players....Champ

Well son, be careful because thats 170 more games than you have played! And if you are referring to being successful in dollar terms I doubt you earn $800k a year.........whoops 2 things to worry about now!🙂

??? I don't earn 800k a year.
I'm paid really well though and according to my talent and skill set. I haven't bluffed my employer into over paying me for years like Brooks has. If I get a 20 year function in my honour, I promise I have the nous to run through the banner properly, unlike your boy Brooks. Now jog on Champ

He hasn’t though ! He’s paid at or around someone of his skill set is paid ie. first grade halfbacks . Blake green was getting 550k in the end and he was on one leg when he signed the last couple of contracts . Townsend is another good example of the supply demand issue currently .
Just because you don’t value him at 800k doesn’t mean the market doesn’t . He’s a top 8 half . Sorry that’s just true . Does it mean he’s by definition an “800k” player . And what we all generally know that label to mean ? No it doesn’t . But the guy earns 800k because the market dictates he earns it . I guarantee you , that if the knights could take brooks right now at full freight they would have done it yesterday . Same for the raiders , bulldogs , cowboys , and arguably the sharks. the Rabbits and Warriors are going with the youth and Johnston , for what that’s worth , and the dragons are stuck with hunt , and now Mbye .
Like I said top 8 half .
The real issue isnt brooks or Townsend on 800k , but what the hell have we been doing for the last 20 years with halves development in Australia . How do we not have 100 benji Marshalls running around right now , or Jonathon Thurstons .
But you all see Brooks -800k NOT WORTH IT . Based on what metric ? He’d probably get more if he was on the open market . It’s the same reason houses went through the roof . Lack of supply in key suburbs. Is that shack down the road worth 700k ? Perfect world , no way ! But it is because someone is willing to pay it . It’s our perspective that’s failed to move not the value .

I think the problem everyone has is that he is NOT a Top 8 half. You're wrong.

Source: He's never played a finals game ever. Therefore he's never been in a Top 8 team, therefore he's never been a Top 8 half

Everyone whose left this club has gone on to play finals. Tedesco, Moses, Woods, Matterson, Aloiai etc. There’s no reason to believe Brooks wouldn’t either. The club has been toxic to players careers.
 
In case you haven’t heard Jesse Bromwich is now going to Dolphins so I reckon 2 things will happen 1. His brother will follow him (possibly) and 2. I expect Melbourne to target Stefano to replace him unless we can resign him before he goes to market
 
@cobarcats said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522608) said:
@A Former User said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522525) said:
@cobarcats said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1522480) said:
Brooks would be a better player if he just played a supportive role.
If someone makes a break you would have Laurie and Brooks backing up on either side.
A bit like Billy Smith and Graham Langlands.
The recent stats showing Brooks as a poor defender but didn't reflect he played more games.
It does highlight our edge defenders are not up to scratch because there were some notable players on that list that had poor defense but don't come under the same scrutiny because their teams had a better points differential. Lucy is going, does that mean someone like Garner gets more game time this year?
Personally I think we need another gun backrower who can tackle and be involved in set plays.
I know I'm going to get smashed here, however, a player like Ryan Matteson would be perfect. He and Papa would be lethal.
Is there someone out there available like him.

Well said Cobes . Brooks is a running 5/8 & Hastings I think will organize & direct play & let Brooks run free. The edges in D have been woeful for the Tigers putting too much pressure on the defenders outside them. Some posters here forget Thurston hid in defence at outside center all his playing days. The club obviously recognize Brooks D is better than Thurstons.
Every half ever to play the game had at least one weakness on the field with one exception...The Great Andrew Johns.

Thanks mate. I Absolutely agree you. Oh except for one thing, he can't fight ?
I'm sure if given time I could come up with several good half backs that have had average success at club level.
One player that comes to mind is Shaun Johnson.
A great little player. Let's look at him for a sec:
With Warriors during the
**2012 -2017 seasons**
* failed to make first week play-offs in 146 games
* did win Rookie Of The Year and Golden Boot Award
* 3 different coaches, McClellan, Elliott, Kearney
* played for All Stars and New Zealand nation team 70% success rate.
He did play in the qual final in 2018 and knocked out in first week against Panffers. Can't really rate that.
Brooks, yes has played more games without success but he has some similarities to Johnson.
Knockers will say Johnson is a dud as well but his representative efforts are awesome and the rosters he played had flaws. He also scored over 1100pts.
Did ok going to the sharks under Morris but they were knocked out 2019 and 2021in first week.
I'd would have loved to have a player like him in our team.
IMO, the club as a whole has been a shambles since post 2005 grand final. The front office, disjointed roster - bad recruiting, coaching debacles, players jumping ship, players under performing.
Of course a playmaker is going to cop it. Comes with the salary.
Andrew Johns would not want him at Newcastle if he was a dud!
Whilst Brooks remains, support our team, look for the positives like our new additions and stop getting so stressed. Be happy! ?

Great post @Cobarcats Very well said.
The voice of reason and sanity prevails :+1: :relieved:
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top