Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

[Mighty_Tiger]

The decision has already been made that he is a 13 and what better outcome for the club than make him compete for the position against two outstanding 13 prospects. By start of 24 both could fill the role.

It's interesting how things are working out. With all the recruitment chatter I'm not convinced.

I do think Hastings could be a good Lock for us pending if his body can hold up but at the same time Sheens said his Hastings comment he also said we won't be chasing props which we know we are.

It's clear they want 2 props from the market with the chase for Klemmer and Lenui to mix it with Stefano, Twal and Musgrove (who doesn't want to leave despite the Dragons making a play).
They are already looking to move Pole to the backrow from what some insiders have said.

If we get Klemmer he is starting, if we get Lenui as well it's either him or Stefano starting.
I just don't see Joffa playing prop - he is a 60min+ player, he won't get the minutes at Prop which leaves him to play lock.

With talk of Laurie going to 5/8th maybe AD is going back to Fullback as well.

We all know Sheens changes things up abit and with him thinking attack 1st it will be interesting how our formations are setup.

 

[gallagher]

Sheens literally said from day dot - Before Hastings was here and he was being interviewed via zoom from OS that Hastings would be Lock...
No one (Including me) Believed it - But that appears to be what's happening....

Then he played halfback. As I said last night things change when your the coach and you are losing. No one can guarantee Brooks will be halfback all next year.

 

[Odessa]

I guess it's hard to confirm EL form.

Can you confirm JB was killing it in England before Raiders?

Wayne Bennett spoke so highly of him he said one of the best players he has coached I trust Bennett's option

 

[Telltails]

Of course they had to bring Hastings over as lock whether it was their intention to play him there or not. As if they were going to let Brooks believe that he was going to replaced when he is the highest paid player in the team and had only ever played 7. They needed leadership on the field and Hastings provided that, and it didn't take long for him to be in the 7 and Brooks at 6.
What happens next year who knows because clearly there is still plenty to play out.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Souths’ Latrell deal ’done’ with Walker set to follow; Eels eye Warriors gun: Transfer Whispers

Souths’ Latrell deal ’done’ with Walker set to follow; Eels eye Warriors gun: Transfer Whispers

www.foxsports.com.au

Now why would Brooks' management be talking to Newcastle when they aren't allowed to negotiate with him until November 1? Maybe he has permission from the club?

Luke Brooks won't be joining Knights: Sheens

The Tigers halfback had emerged as a possible replacement for Mitchell Pearce.

www.newcastleherald.com.au

This not definitive enough for you from Sheens; Newcastle Herald as well. So where is your source?

 

[Odessa]

sheens doesn't think so, I agree Hastings is important as a ball playing 13 not as a 7

I think Sheenius will get the most attacking players in the starting 17 more options the better

 

[Newtown]

likewise is Douhie a 1, a 6 a 13 or a 3 ?

Is Joffa an 8 or a 13?

 

[weststigerman]

Luke Brooks won't be joining Knights: Sheens

The Tigers halfback had emerged as a possible replacement for Mitchell Pearce.

www.newcastleherald.com.au

This not definitive enough for you from Sheens; Newcastle Herald as well. So we're is your source?

Already posted it.

Didn't Sheens also say he's not in the market for a front rower? Pom tells us we've offered Klemmer a big contract.

Usually when you're trying to sell a car you make out it out to be more valuable than it really is to get the sale.

Continue defending Brooks/criticising Hastings all you like, I've got better things to do.

 

[earl]

No one (Including me) Believed it - But that appears to be what's happening....

I argued strongly that Hastings was bought in to play 7 and I didn't believe a word out of Sheens mouth. Hastings was moved to 13 and it seemed to be via Sheens pushing for it. Paws to me has got it correct but none of it matters.

We'll find out over the course of the season.

 

[earl]

Is Joffa an 8 or a 13?

It depends. Nelson has played heaps of games at 13. Sometimes you play a hooker/forward there like Brandon Smith.

I like Joe O in either position.

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Already posted it.

Didn't Sheens also say he's not in the market for a front rower? Pom tells us we've offered Klemmer a big contract.

Usually when you're trying to sell a car you make out it out to be more valuable than it really is to get the sale.

Continue defending Brooks/criticising Hastings all you like, I've got better things to do.

Did you read the article you posted? What is your view on this advice contained in the article (italics added)

Kent and James Hooper noted that Sheens has been solid on keeping Brooks all the way along.

“Sheens has shown no inclination in letting Luke Brooks go,” Kent said.

“I admire the Knights because they just keep chipping away.

“He has been consistent and solid on that from the word go, Tim Sheens,” James Hooper added.

 

[tony soprano]

Is Joffa an 8 or a 13?

8

 

[batboy]

I argued strongly that Hastings was bought in to play 7 and I didn't believe a word out of Sheens mouth. Hastings was moved to 13 and it seemed to be via Sheens pushing for it. Paws to me has got it correct but none of it matters.

We'll find out over the course of the season.

JH to 13 Also coincided with Doueihi coming back
- Doueihi wasn't injured when Hastings was signed...
Who knows how it plays out if he didn't go down.

 

[Mighty_Tiger]

Is Joffa an 8 or a 13?

The question is Joffa an 8 if we sign Klemmer &/or Lenui - I don't see it.

 

[rex2ce]

Souths’ Latrell deal ’done’ with Walker set to follow; Eels eye Warriors gun: Transfer Whispers

Souths’ Latrell deal ’done’ with Walker set to follow; Eels eye Warriors gun: Transfer Whispers

www.foxsports.com.au

Now why would Brooks' management be talking to Newcastle when they aren't allowed to negotiate with him until November 1? Maybe he has permission from the club?

They can negotiate with him anytime, but cannot formally offer him a contract until Nov 1, can’t believe this question still comes up.
The whole system is a joke, of course they would have unofficially “offered “ him by now if both camps are keen

 

[getagrip]

Cant believe the hundreds of pro and anti Brooks posts . I believe the guy is a mixed bag . His tackling has improved over the years and he has a great turn of speed but his 5th tackle options always look rushed and indecisive but that has a bit to do with a pack that has no go forward and is on the back foot . His kicking game is at best ordinary .
In general I feel 9 years should be ample to make your mark and lock down that
No 7 jersey. Furthermore he is very structured last couple of years as opposed to instinctive eyes up footy . Maybe Sheens thinks he can change all that but
IMO I don't think so .
But what spine do we have
Laurie a small but gutsy fullback
Douehi can play 1, 3 ,4 or 6 I feel he is most value in centers given we are really lacking talent there
Hastings .he's main organiser on field and best place for that is at 7
even when he was at 13 he played like 2nd halfback .
If Brooks stays I would put him at 6 but keeping him is not my preference

Think you answered your own query.

 

[gallagher]

Did you read the article you posted? What is your view on this advice contained in the article (italics added)

Kent and James Hooper noted that Sheens has been solid on keeping Brooks all the way along.

“Sheens has shown no inclination in letting Luke Brooks go,” Kent said.

“I admire the Knights because they just keep chipping away.

“He has been consistent and solid on that from the word go, Tim Sheens,” James Hooper added.

Kent and Hooper. That's gold 🤣🤣

 

[Aceshigh]

Looks i think brooks should move on, he’s had his chance. But to say he is the worst 7 ever let me just run some names by you -
Michael Gillet
Ben Duckworth
Shane dunley
Ben black
Ben Jeffries
Glen Air
Adam Tippett
Ben reynolds
Kieren Kerr
Jacob Miller
Josh Drinkwater

Just to make a few halves.

Ben Duckworth was a ball playing lock , a handy player at that

 

[gallagher]

Ben Duckworth was a ball playing lock , a handy player at that

Dodgy knees I think. Very skilful

 

[pawsandclaws1]

Kent and Hooper. That's gold 🤣🤣

This is gold 😁

He has been consistent and solid on that from the word go, Tim Sheens,” James Hooper added.