Signings, Suggestions & Rumours Discussion

why? are not past the years of giving out long term contracts based on potential

if they didn’t rate him they just wouldn’t of extended him really

he worked for the extension and deserved it, I don’t see the problem with it
Two years is pretty standard. One indicates the club doesn’t seem to have much faith.
 
Talk about salary rorts, have a listen to Adel Hage on Sunday pod talk about NRLW and how the “strong” clubs get snd keep NRLW players.

The players union are all in on it, too.

If the women are doing it with NRL and union blessing guaranteed the mens game is worse.
 
No doubt. I agree. But they don’t rely on being fed information from clubs, players and player managers for their day to day job like Chammas, Read, etc do. If a day in day out rugby league journo exposed a salary cap breach I reckon they would be ostracised for spoiling the rort that everyone is in on.
Agreed.
 
What irks me is the discretion that allows a ref! They can choose when to penalise and to let go. Just penalise according to the rules! The players and coaches will adjust very quickly. Players make errors when under pressure which is normally the result of good play from the opposition.
100% We have seen it all year, the ebb and flow of the games it's all about momentum and the ref's have total control of it through the way they interpret the rules and how they apply them. Iv seen some allow 6 repeat sets on the try line and we had Luai sent after 3. The refereeing is a tough gig but atm they have way to much influence over how a game pans out. Not in terms of giving away penalties but by completely stopping any momentum a team might build.
 

Members online

Back
Top