pawsandclaws1
Well-known member
The incursion of the Chiefs into the market has impacted contract values. Interesting the Chiefs are attempting to undercut that market correction.
'
'
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would pay to seek your own advice from a tax consultant before signing a contract.If you're on a $1.1m contract or even a salary in Australia you will pay $482,870 in tax.
$900,000 tax free sounds pretty good to me. There is a major problem that's brewing quickly.
If you're on a $1.1m contract or salary in Australia you will pay $482,870 in tax.
$900,000 tax free sounds pretty good to me. There is a major problem that's brewing quickly.
The incursion of the Chiefs into the market has impacted contract values. Interesting the Chiefs are attempting to undercut that market correction.
'
The latest move by the Chiefs imo is an admission the market correction of player contracts is not sustainable.I'm going to liken this to Melbourne coming into the NRL in 1998 after the Super League war and being 100% backed by News Limited. They won the premiership in 1999.
There was a massive incentive to ensure that the Storm was instantly successful in an AFL centric state.
The same thing is happening here, however the primary cash cow is the government. The difference is that the Storm were not given player tax free concessions.
It's no longer a level playing field. There's just not enough great talent to go around, so there will be huge disparities in games and scorelines.
Albo and PVL have gotten this wrong. That's why Abdo jumped ship.
I know.And champion @Leck - this "advantage" goes for 10 years !
Yeah I think we all get that … but Vlandys is specifically saying that PNG can’t use that as a way to get players to sign there on the cheapIf you're on a $1.1m contract or salary in Australia you will pay $482,870 in tax.
$900,000 tax free sounds pretty good to me. There is a major problem that's brewing quickly.
I know.
I just wish we had concentrated on building the Bears first, then introduced a second New Zealand team from the South Island, based in Christchurch, and finally brought in a PNG team for the 2030 season.
It feels like a knee jerk reaction rather than a properly planned expansion strategy.
The incursion of the Chiefs into the market has impacted contract values. Interesting the Chiefs are attempting to undercut that market correction.
'
Agreed. That has to be a good outcome for clubs.They were attempting it .. but according to the article in the news today … they have been told by PVL that they can’t do it …
I guess we will have to see what eventuates .. but it’s looking like Young won’t be going there in 2028
Agreed. That has to be a good outcome for clubs.
I'm worried that there will be inequality in club rosters going forward due to the expansion.They were attempting it .. but according to the article in the news today … they have been told by PVL that they can’t do it …
I guess we will have to see what eventuates .. but it’s looking like Young won’t be going there in 2028
I'm worried that there will be inequality in club rosters going forward due to the expansion.
I have previously floated, that there should be a draft and a set transfer window. I understand that Terry (RIP) felt it limited his choices in the '90s, however, the game has moved on and it's now a professional sports business.
A draft and transfer window would change how players are distributed and help create a level playing field.
It's working for the AFL.
You ask that like’s he’s talking in code. It’s common knowledge who TMM is.Ill bite who is TMM
If there was a draft the only that would be achieved would be Wests Tigers catching a cold.Yes , there is going to be strong and weak clubs … and I’m worried that our club is going to continue to be one of the weak ones … but I wouldn’t be relying on a draft to come along as a fix unfortunately
Possibly, however this current grassroots system isn't working in my opinion.As you say … they attempted a draft in Rugby League 30 years ago , and the players didn’t cop it and went to court and won … Rugby League clubs are much more self interested than the AFL , and the players seem to have a louder voice ..it seriously wouldn’t last one offseason before someone challenged it … we see the behaviour of players trying to get out of contracts all the time … there would be no chance of some wonder kid rookie going somewhere he didn’t want to ..
Yes , there is going to be strong and weak clubs … and I’m worried that our club is going to continue to be one of the weak ones … but I wouldn’t be relying on a draft to come along as a fix unfortunately
The AFL has had some very poor teams over the past few seasons who barely win games. Also teams that have consistently been up the top. Distribution of talent via a draft/transfer window doesn’t always lead to a closer competition.I'm worried that there will be inequality in club rosters going forward due to the expansion.
I have previously floated, that there should be a draft and a set transfer window. I understand that Terry (RIP) felt it limited his choices in the '90s, however, the game has moved on and it's now a professional sports business.
A draft and transfer window would change how players are distributed and help create a level playing field.
It's working for the AFL.