PrattenParkMagpie
Well-known member
@ said:@ said:@ said:I don't like front or back loading. The benefit quickly becomes a disadvantage. Okay, fine if it's for a small percentage of the contract, but no for large chunks.
\
\
This is okay:
Year 1: 500
Year 2: 350
Year 3: 350
Not Okay:
Year 1: 700
Year 2: 250
Year 3: 250
The only way it really should be used is if there is a player on a large sum who is due to retire/leave at a certain date, in which case utilising their cap space for future periods is acceptable. Requires planning though. :roll
Can you please explain what's wrong with:
Year 1: 700
Year 2: 250
Year 3: 250
Player X plays year one, receives the $700k and asks for early release to join another club.
Also bad news the other way around where player X is recieves $200k year 1 and is promised $700k in year 2 and gets pushed into leaving by the club.
I think this is one of the major issues Robbie and Benji had with the club. **_Both players took unders and were promised more in backended contracts but were told to look around effectively being pushed out without receiving all the contract money promised._**
:unamused: really!, I must have been asleep while that was happening :roll