beachtiger
Well-known member
@Spud_Murphy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1066834) said:@beachtiger said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1066832) said:@Spud_Murphy said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1066819) said:@Earl said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1066706) said:@avocadoontoast said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1066702) said:@supercoach said in [Signing Suggestions & Rumours](/post/1066697) said:Reading the last 100 pages it seems Packer is staying and McQueen are staying due lack of interest. The only gaps we are going to have is Matterson..arguably our best player and a rough chance of Reynolds and Mats ( if he gets a medical discharge)
So it is highly unlikely our roster is going to be much different in 2020. I guess we all knew that but it is some what depressing
At this stage we'll have the same team as last year but missing Matterson and no specialist hooker.
It sounds terrible doesn't it. We need to improve on last year but we look to be going backwards. Let's hope Madge can pull a rabbit out of the hat.
What happened to the ‘benefit’ we’re supposed to be getting out of releasing Matterson? Everyone seemed so sure we wouldn’t let him go without getting something in return.
Has he been released already? If not it may be a bit premature for this post don’t you think?
Can you look at the posts that I have quoted above - that’s what I am responding to with my question.
Understand that mate but I still think until Matterson is or isn’t released we can’t determine whether there’s been any benefit. You commented that everyone seemed sure we wouldn’t let him go without getting something in return, we’ll at this stage we haven’t so again I think the comment is a touch premature.