twentyforty
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2019
- Messages
- 8,251
@cktiger said in [SOO Game 1 2021 \*Spoilers](/post/1385036) said:@twentyforty said in [SOO Game 1 2021 \*Spoilers](/post/1385022) said:@happy_tiger said in [SOO Game 1 2021 \*Spoilers](/post/1385017) said:@innsaneink said in [SOO Game 1 2021 \*Spoilers](/post/1385012) said:@happy_tiger said in [SOO Game 1 2021 \*Spoilers](/post/1384987) said:@innsaneink said in [SOO Game 1 2021 \*Spoilers](/post/1384959) said:@happy_tiger said in [SOO Game 1 2021 \*Spoilers](/post/1384887) said:Better side won
Only Qlder who deserves feeding was Fotuika ...the rest of the side barring maybe Arrow was pitiful
Green proved why he got sacked at the Cows ...2nd man ..2nd man plays are not going to stack up at this level
Refereeing in the 1st twenty was shocking ....the kick that you got a penalty from and took the 2 .....it was sitting out side my letterbox by the time JAC even crossed the try line
1st try was after a missed offside call ten metres from the NSW try line after we put that kick up and it was knocked on by NSW and then grabbed in a offside position by NSW
2nd try ...watch it again ...shocking obstruction / shepherd in the lead up play / break
Game was over at 14-0
Townsville is a poo place ...nothing good ever happens in Townsville
How was the third try.... and the 4th, 5th....6th 7th & 8th?
???
I guess the top comment covered that ...better side won
Oh sorry.... Your Butthurt bleating distracted me from that gracious concession.... Carry on
Stop being a negative nelly about my negative nelly rant
The biggest call that turned the game was the missed obstruction / shepherd call leading up to the 2nd try
Goers from 14-0 to 8-0 with Qld getting a penalty 40 out ...but then again with Green's popgun plans in attack
Just my opinion, but I tend to think the 52 missed tackles by QLD had a major bearing on the outcome?
Has there ever been, in the history of Origin, a side clock up that many missed tackles with an even share of possession?
Gosh, in 2015 when QLD had 70% possession helping them rack up 50 points, the Blues missed only 39 tackles.
At one point QLD had 5 sets in a row ...and still couldn't get anything done.
Defence got it done for NSW and our backs ran riot.
What I don’t understand is, as Kenty was saying Qld always selects a team which can defend, based on the premise defence wins big games, while the blues build a team based on its capacity to pile on points. So what went wrong with Qld’s defensive effort? I think the damage had been done before those 5 consecutive sets, Blues had already asserted their dominance in the centre. It’s always been that way in big games imo, just the same as a game of chess. Control the centre early and you control the game.