Souffs are vulnerable

[clifferdSH]

Why would George Burgess be out for?

If so then really Sam is there only threat there bench forwards are terrible remind you off anyone?

If we can get in Sam's head and cause him to leak a few penalty and drop balls then we've got a good chance

IMO Tedesco and Brooks always perform against Bunnies have a look at the highlights of each game from the last 2 years

Tedesco will have a blinder I reckon he'll have a lot of space and he'll make the rabbits pay he'll be eager to get last weeks game out of his head

George was citied for something and has been charged can't remember what for though but Souths supporters reckon he'll get done

We always aim up against Souths, no matter how we're going. People who say otherwise have very short memories

I'll restore yours

Woods
Galloway
Tapau
Gavet
Sue
Ava

Lol ok , nvm we are no chance then we will lose 50 - 0\. Is that what you wanted to hear?

positive thoughts gets you nowhere on here

 

[Milky]

Why would George Burgess be out for?

If so then really Sam is there only threat there bench forwards are terrible remind you off anyone?

If we can get in Sam's head and cause him to leak a few penalty and drop balls then we've got a good chance

IMO Tedesco and Brooks always perform against Bunnies have a look at the highlights of each game from the last 2 years

Tedesco will have a blinder I reckon he'll have a lot of space and he'll make the rabbits pay he'll be eager to get last weeks game out of his head

George was citied for something and has been charged can't remember what for though but Souths supporters reckon he'll get done

We always aim up against Souths, no matter how we're going. People who say otherwise have very short memories

I'll restore yours

Woods
Galloway
Tapau
Gavet
Sue
Ava

Lol ok , nvm we are no chance then we will lose 50 - 0\. Is that what you wanted to hear?

positive thoughts gets you nowhere on here

It isn't that, i just dont think our forwards can match it with theres, honestly who do you think will step up?

 

[Tigerheart_returns]

I'd like to see us put in the effort and the new guys have a go. A win will be a bonus, for sure.

 

[clifferdSH]

George was citied for something and has been charged can't remember what for though but Souths supporters reckon he'll get done

We always aim up against Souths, no matter how we're going. People who say otherwise have very short memories

I'll restore yours

Woods
Galloway
Tapau
Gavet
Sue
Ava

Lol ok , nvm we are no chance then we will lose 50 - 0\. Is that what you wanted to hear?

positive thoughts gets you nowhere on here

It isn't that, i just dont think our forwards can match it with theres, honestly who do you think will step up?

I reckon our whole forward pack is on notice, so they will all put in (hoping Ava, Grant, Sue in particular of course)

We lost 8-0 to Parra (with Woods of course), who is one of the in form packs in the comp..no reason why we can't match a heavily depleted Souths side

 

[jirskyr]

I do think Souths are in trouble and we are a legitimate chance, but I don't like the 5-day turnaround with all the defensive work we did last week.

We might start like shot ducks, which is bad, because our opening 20 is usually our best quarter.

 

[maxxy86]

Honestly can't see us winning…....but hopefully we make it a contest and take some positives out of game.

 

[Nelson]

The Souths pack haven't been that flash this season. George and Tom have been dreadful bar maybe one game for George. Paul Carter has plenty of talent but no brains and should by rights be out given the blatant trip he put on. Dave Tyrrell and Jason Clark I wouldn't even pick ahead of anyone in our pack (although Clark at least has a go).

Sam Burgess, Chris Grevsmuhl and Nathan Brown are going to be the dangers in the pack. We should just use them as a focus to fire up. Pick them out in the defensive line and run that bit harder at them. There doesn't seem to be much motivation coming from within the playing group so until that comes back they can just get by on personal rivalries. Stopping the other guy winning and making him hurt along the way.

 

[hobbo]

I do think Souths are in trouble and we are a legitimate chance, but I don't like the 5-day turnaround with all the defensive work we did last week.

We might start like shot ducks, which is bad, because our opening 20 is usually our best quarter.

We didn't do any defensive work lol
We just practiced kick offs all arvo .

I think we'll go the first 15-20 mins with Souffs then the mental weakness will strike again .

 

[teddy23]

I'll restore yours

Woods
Galloway
Tapau
Gavet
Sue
Ava

Lol ok , nvm we are no chance then we will lose 50 - 0\. Is that what you wanted to hear?

positive thoughts gets you nowhere on here

It isn't that, i just dont think our forwards can match it with theres, honestly who do you think will step up?

I reckon our whole forward pack is on notice, so they will all put in (hoping Ava, Grant, Sue in particular of course)

We lost 8-0 to Parra (with Woods of course), who is one of the in form packs in the comp..no reason why we can't match a heavily depleted Souths side

Add Chris Lawrence to that list and if Siro pulls his head out of his ass he's another one you can add, we should be able to test them in the forwards only Sam Burgess, Nathan Brown and Chris Grvishmul are there only threats with Brown and Grivishmul only 30 min impact players

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

I do think Souths are in trouble and we are a legitimate chance, but I don't like the 5-day turnaround with all the defensive work we did last week.

We might start like shot ducks, which is bad, because our opening 20 is usually our best quarter.

We let in 60 points, there wasn't any defensive work being done… :laughing:

I can't anything other result than us getting pantsed really...

 

[Snake]

I do think Souths are in trouble and we are a legitimate chance, but I don't like the 5-day turnaround with all the defensive work we did last week.

We might start like shot ducks, which is bad, because our opening 20 is usually our best quarter.

Does defensive work mean watching the Raiders players run past you for tries ,and not even attempting to tackle them?

 

[stevetiger]

I just look at the title of this thread and think Souths may be vulnerable but we definitely are.

 

[GNR4LIFE]

If they're vulnerable, what the hell are we?

 

[hobbo]

If they're vulnerable, what the hell are we?

Extinct !

 

[clifferdSH]

If they're vulnerable, what the hell are we?

True, but do you not think they're more vulnerable this time round rather than playing them previous years.

They are a shade of what they were atm

 

[Doc_Tiger]

Ingliss on one leg is gonna barrel through Milone, Brooks and Moses. I fear once again, that another team is going to play themselves into form and repair their for and against somewhat.

 

[Icon]

Our away record is:

40 - 108

and that was against Titans, Knights and Raiders, no certain top 8 team there, possibly bottom 4 sides.

we are twice as bad away from home, our view of our performances have been made to look better since we have played 5 home 3 away, and 4 of those home have been at a traditional ground.

I suppose you can argue it's at Homebush.

The boys play better at a parochial setting, this won't be one of those, well lose by more than 20.

 

[Icon]

Our away record is:

40 - 108

and that was against Titans, Knights and Raiders, no certain top 8 team there, possibly bottom 4 sides.

we are twice as bad away from home, our view of our performances have been made to look better since we have played 5 home 3 away, and 4 of those home have been at a traditional ground.

I suppose you can argue it's at Homebush.

The boys play better at a parochial setting, this won't be one of those, well lose by more than 20.

Just further to my post, i went looking for these stats because I've been to all the home games and the knights and raiders games and i noticed a definite difference in the way they play.

 

[Love_the_WestsTigers]

I'm not a big fan of ANZ Stadium, not unless its close to a "full house"