South Sydney's Latrell Mitchell in hot water

[Fade.To.Black]

Latrell now Minus 12 off his Daily Mongrel tally!

Did they add those 12 onto Chin's tally? A present from 1 NRL golden-boy to another so to speak.

 

[JD Tiger]

He failed, 4 weeks

Hooray, the NRL got one right.
Hopefully he has to serve all four matches against us.


I think champion @BalmainJnr you're onto something there.
As the process stands, any penalty follows upcoming games.
What about if the penalty is i game or more, that ONE of the games has to be against the offended team in the first game the teams meet again.
That way, the offended team actually gets their piece of justice in all this.

I like it, a good idea.

 

[69-05-41]

That didn't go to script! Maybe the bunker can step in like they did on Saturday and reverse the result, so Rugby League can be the winner. In Toddles' day they would have met in Souffs carpark, acquitted, then taken Latrell out to dinner with Slater presenting him with his Dally M.

 

[Fade.To.Black]

He failed, 4 weeks

Hooray, the NRL got one right.
Hopefully he has to serve all four matches against us.


I think champion @BalmainJnr you're onto something there.
As the process stands, any penalty follows upcoming games.
What about if the penalty is i game or more, that ONE of the games has to be against the offended team in the first game the teams meet again.
That way, the offended team actually gets their piece of justice in all this.

If the incident occurred in a GF though for example, the offending team still gets the probability of winning a premiership yet the offender only misses a match the next season. That would still suck for the team on the receiving end of the indescretion.
Scumbag should've got 10 in the bin from the Nofo incident to begin with. The other 2 incidents might not have happened if that happened.

 

[hugh1954]

He failed, 4 weeks

Hooray, the NRL got one right.
Hopefully he has to serve all four matches against us.


I think champion @BalmainJnr you're onto something there.
As the process stands, any penalty follows upcoming games.
What about if the penalty is i game or more, that ONE of the games has to be against the offended team in the first game the teams meet again.
That way, the offended team actually gets their piece of justice in all this.

If the incident occurred in a GF though for example, the offending team still gets the probability of winning a premiership yet the offender only misses a match the next season. That would still suck for the team on the receiving end of the indescretion.
Scumbag should've got 10 in the bin from the Nofo incident to begin with. The other 2 incidents might not have happened if that happened.

Except they are too freightened to sin bin high profile players, lets sent of rookies and less well known players without big sponsorship

 

[Telltails]

Still don't know why we didnt receive a penalty.

 

[hugh1954]

Still don't know why we didnt receive a penalty.

Still don't know why we didnt receive a penalty.

Because latrene might of become angry is the answer

 

[Fade.To.Black]

9.28pm: Verdict. Radley has been successful in getting the careless high tackle charge downgraded. A $1900 fine is his penalty.

😂😂😂😂😂Of course he was successful. First their hooker Marschke? and now Radley got off crusher and headhigh tackles respectively. What a joke of a competition.

The Roosters surely have the best record at the judiciary in the last 10 years......not sure why they even bother charging their players to begin with. Waste of time. What I wouldn't give to have our club treated this way at the judiciary and by the NRL in general.

 

[Fade.To.Black]

Still don't know why we didnt receive a penalty.

Maximus gave the thumbs-down from the stands.

 

[Elderslie_Tiger]

This is what Mark Ellison Souffs football manager had to say about Latrines 4 match ban .It would have to be the greatest lead of of crap ever

Losing a player like Mitchell would not just hurt South Sydney, it would hurt rugby league fans, according to the club's football manager Mark Ellison.

"The big thing is that the crowds aren't going to see him for four matches, which is sad for the game and unfortunate for him," Ellison said. "Anyway we'll move on.

"We're disappointed for the result tonight.

If he wasn't such a grubby player he would would be still have been playing the decision by the NRL may restore a little bit of faith in the system but they have a long way to go .

 

[hobbo1]

Misses magic round too 😂

 

[Fade.To.Black]

This is what Mark Ellison Souffs football manager had to say about Latrines 4 match ban .It would have to be the greatest lead of of crap ever

Losing a player like Mitchell would not just hurt South Sydney, it would hurt rugby league fans, according to the club's football manager Mark Ellison.

"The big thing is that the crowds aren't going to see him for four matches, which is sad for the game and unfortunate for him," Ellison said. "Anyway we'll move on.

"We're disappointed for the result tonight.

If he wasn't such a grubby player he would would be still have been playing the decision by the NRL may restore a little bit of faith in the system but they have a long way to go .

I'd counter that plenty of RL fans would be hoping that the maggot misses more than just 4 matches for the remainder of this season. A jaw-shattering head-high on the bloke would be pretty good to see🤞. Play with fire, you might get burnt.

 

[Tigerdave]

I don't think 4 weeks is long enough, he went in there with intent. Anyway it doesn't help us, only helps the teams playing South's in the next 4 rounds

 

[GNR4LIFE]

It’s bizarre that they were fighting the charge, yet he wasn’t named in their 21 man squad this week. So they must have known he was no chance of getting off.

 

[AJ1]

He failed, 4 weeks

Hooray, the NRL got one right.
Hopefully he has to serve all four matches against us.


I think champion @BalmainJnr you're onto something there.
As the process stands, any penalty follows upcoming games.
What about if the penalty is i game or more, that ONE of the games has to be against the offended team in the first game the teams meet again.
That way, the offended team actually gets their piece of justice in all this.

I proposed that a couple of pages back but it goes to show the idea has merit as we are all thinking it

 

[krissy]

It’s bizarre that they were fighting the charge, yet he wasn’t named in their 21 man squad this week. So they must have known he was no chance of getting off.

Probably just trying to make out that he wouldn’t get a bunny free pass haha which ultimately he didn’t.
I think they are very shocked.

 

[Cairnstigers]

He failed, 4 weeks

Hooray, the NRL got one right.
Hopefully he has to serve all four matches against us.


I think champion @BalmainJnr you're onto something there.
As the process stands, any penalty follows upcoming games.
What about if the penalty is i game or more, that ONE of the games has to be against the offended team in the first game the teams meet again.
That way, the offended team actually gets their piece of justice in all this.

Justice might be better served on the field

 

[tig_prmz]

It’s bizarre that they were fighting the charge, yet he wasn’t named in their 21 man squad this week. So they must have known he was no chance of getting off.

even a downgrade careless charge would've got him 1 week I think.

 

[Leichardt61]

Bunnies fans are absolutely delusional it's actually incredible. The amount of comments saying the NRL only did it "cause he's aboriginal", "wasn't even anything in it", "NRL are cheats suspending trell so papenhuyzen can get dally m". Absolute scenes.

 

[bathursttiger1]

Guilty 4 weeks suspension.