Support Justin

@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Not sure that it is fair that Wests and Pascoe cannot meet to co-ordinate their defence.

I'm sure it's not fair.. It stinks

Nazi state

Maybe it’s to stop them from cooking up excuses, which if we are guilty, is fair enough.

IF we are guilty, fair enough. IF we are not guilty, it's absolute BS. You seem to heavily favour the GUILTY side of the ledger hey?
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Not sure that it is fair that Wests and Pascoe cannot meet to co-ordinate their defence.

100%. I'm not exactly sure how the NRL has the power to mandate things like that. I suppose it's easy when you both write and enforce the rules.

The NRL have destroyed Justin Pascoes reputation and taken away his livelihood for what really on the scope of things … There are laws in this country that need to be adhered to watch this space as the New year will be interesting regarding this matter IMO.

Exactly. There are laws of the Country and State and you cannot contract them away. Indeed the New Year could be very interesting.

Well if Pascoe is found not guilty by the NRL , we will have every opportunity to countersue with a defamation suit
 
@ said:
No offense but i have to laugh that people think getting rid of Todd Greenberg will fix anything. The whole organisation is corrupt. Greenberg is just the spokesman for the movement.

If the CEO isn't running the show and calling all the shots, then who is? Greenberg the grubby faeces-lice is as seedy as it gets, the little germ would be more than having his 2 bob's worth of input without a doubt.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
100%. I'm not exactly sure how the NRL has the power to mandate things like that. I suppose it's easy when you both write and enforce the rules.

The NRL have destroyed Justin Pascoes reputation and taken away his livelihood for what really on the scope of things … There are laws in this country that need to be adhered to watch this space as the New year will be interesting regarding this matter IMO.

Exactly. There are laws of the Country and State and you cannot contract them away. Indeed the New Year could be very interesting.

Well if Pascoe is found not guilty by the NRL , we will have every opportunity to countersue with a defamation suit

Cant see a chance in hell that he would be found not guilty by the NRL themselves….they already have him pegged as guilty. He may however stand a chance in a court of law.
 
Not sure how you can de-register someone and at the same time give them 30 days to show cause.

The damage to his reputation already, regardless of the outcome in 30 days, especially when he was de-registered on the very same day another official was de-registerd WITH cause is offensive.

Smart play would have been to do this behind closed doors and then de-register AFTER the 30 days if required, or, leave him in place with a warning notice of investigation.

This is a significant official with a high profile reputation. It's very poor corporately and operationally by the NRL. I hope Pascoe gives it to them guilty or not. I support A penalty if guilty of course…..
 
@ said:
@ said:
No offense but i have to laugh that people think getting rid of Todd Greenberg will fix anything. The whole organisation is corrupt. Greenberg is just the spokesman for the movement.

If the CEO isn't running the show and calling all the shots, then who is? Greenberg the grubby faeces-lice is as seedy as it gets, the little germ would be more than having his 2 bob's worth of input without a doubt.

Of course he is putting his stamp on things. He does have some power. Its more like a political party however. Its not always the leaders who call the shots, its the party heavy weights, the power brokers. The influence that comes from investors, lobbying from big business etc.

Removing Greenberg wont do much.

Youd need to look at the Politis's the Gould's of the world. The guys who have a seat at the top of the food chain who wield power and influence decision making.
 
Pascoe was targeted here in an unfair manner. You will find it’s because he has done an exceptional job at the Tigers. He is an internal threat to the CEO of the NRL. It’s organisational politics. No way he deserved to be de registered reputations damage was for a purpose not for the cap just gave an excuse.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
I'm sure it's not fair.. It stinks

Nazi state

Maybe it’s to stop them from cooking up excuses, which if we are guilty, is fair enough.

IF we are guilty, fair enough. IF we are not guilty, it's absolute BS. You seem to heavily favour the GUILTY side of the ledger hey?

So far, none of us know whether Pascoe is guilty, or that the NRLis right or wrong, and won’t untill they have accusedhe either defends it , or simply accepts it.
I’m not on any side, just can’t see any organisation
That would do what the NRL has said and done
What they have. Unless they have no doubt that they’ve got the evidence
 
@ said:
It would interesting to hear what Sam Ayoub's thoughts on whether he thought the deal was under the table or legitimate

And if it was illegitimate why isn't he getting a piece of barbed wire shoved up his clacker as well

Or perhaps Sam come through with his promise …...

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/robbie-farahs-manager-sam-ayoub-prepares-to-dump-dirty-laundry-to-embarrass-wests-tigers/news-story/006fbfb1f8dca5119df32dc14a7fb76c

It's all in the dirt file…
 
@ said:
Appeal has been lodged it will be interesting how long the process will take

Dunno. They really should have an independent tribunal to determine these kinds of things as it seems like the NRL takes on the role of both prosecutor and adjudicator which is far from ideal (in the Australian legal system anyway…)
 
@ said:
@ said:
Appeal has been lodged it will be interesting how long the process will take

Dunno. They really should have an independent tribunal to determine these kinds of things as it seems like the NRL takes on the role of both prosecutor and adjudicator which is far from ideal (in the Australian legal system anyway…)

Agree

Appealing to the guys who handed down the corrupt ruling in the first place.

There are a million reasons per annum for a certain CEO to yrash any potential competitors for his job especially when he is truly struggling.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
Appeal has been lodged it will be interesting how long the process will take

Dunno. They really should have an independent tribunal to determine these kinds of things as it seems like the NRL takes on the role of both prosecutor and adjudicator which is far from ideal (in the Australian legal system anyway…)

Agree

Appealing to the guys who handed down the corrupt ruling in the first place.

There are a million reasons per annum for a certain CEO to yrash any potential competitors for his job especially when he is truly struggling.

Yep. Got to get the NRL in front of a court of law, not let them run thier own Kangaroo court.
 
I would not be upset if Justin Potato fails to get reinstated.

I just don't buy this belief that he's been fantastic. Much of the positive change at the club was done by Cleary.
 
@ said:
I would not be upset if Justin Potato fails to get reinstated.

I just don't buy this belief that he's been fantastic. Much of the positive change at the club was done by Cleary.

So we can assume you are not in the camp that believes Greenberg saw Pascoe as a threat to his job.
 
@ said:
I would not be upset if Justin Potato fails to get reinstated.

I just don't buy this belief that he's been fantastic. Much of the positive change at the club was done by Cleary.

I think he is a good commercial operations manager but the CEO's role maybe beyond his abilities. This is a pretty big mistake to make.
 
Justin Pascoe has got some really tangible results

Turning a $4 million dollar black hole when he arrive din 2015 into a profit for a think the first time in the clubs history. Increased memberships. increased sponsorship, I think i read over 65 community programs including welfare and mental health initiatives. Luring a Premiership winning coach.

This all off the back of 7 seasons without finals.

Now i not sure how much you can attribute a CEO with lack of results on the field. Its probably subjective however he would deserve to carry some of the can there for mine. However the Football operations guys are chief leaders in that although pascoe certainly has a say in who gets those roles.

However he has some very tangible results in terms of some of the general criteria I feel of being a good CEO.

To say that Cleary has had more to do with positive change. Well one 9th placed finish and leaving us like that.

Im a bit baffled with that comment.
 
Back
Top