Team V Souths

We are the only team that has a rotation policy for our wingers
you play one week
the next week you get a sun tan on the bench
and third week your 18th man till friday than drop back to reggies

Of course that policy dosnt apply to the great Lotte only the other three and the great Fitzy only rotates between the starting 13 and the bench, Iam mean what fool would drop him!!!
 
see here http://www.weststigers.com.au/default.aspx?s=team" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Looks like the side to me given Lui is at 7.
 
@Yossarian said:
@fergiefurr said:
@tigerdre said:
Not official but this WILL be the team

1.Ryan
2.Tuqiri
3.Lawernce
4.Ayshford
5.Brown
6.Marshall
7.Lui
8.Gibbs
9.Farah
10.Galloway
11.Ellis
12.Payton
13.Heignington

14.Fulton
15.Fafita
16.Flanagan
17.Fitzhenry
18.Moors
19.Dwyer

you got a tip ot its just a guess?

Looks like an official guess

Wrong :exclamation:
It was not a guess.
I'm just glad my source didn't make me look like a dick :wink:
 
@alien said:
1\. Ryan
2\. Tuqiri
3\. Lawrence
4\. Ayshford
5\. Pritchard
6\. Marshall (vc)
7\. Taumata
8\. Gibbs
9\. Farah ©
10\. Galloway
11\. Ellis
12\. Fulton
13\. Heighington

interchange:
14\. Flanagan
15\. Moors
16\. Payten
17\. Fifita

now that galloway is out injured and lui is fit to play my team would be:

1\. Ryan
2\. Tuqiri
3\. Lawrence
4\. Ayshford
5\. Pritchard
6\. Marshall (vc)
7\. Lui
8\. Gibbs
9\. Farah ©
10\. Payten
11\. Ellis
12\. Fulton
13\. Heighington

interchange:
14\. Flanagan
15\. Davis
16\. Moors
17\. Fifita
 
@alien said:
@alien said:
1\. Ryan
2\. Tuqiri
3\. Lawrence
4\. Ayshford
5\. Pritchard
6\. Marshall (vc)
7\. Taumata
8\. Gibbs
9\. Farah ©
10\. Galloway
11\. Ellis
12\. Fulton
13\. Heighington

interchange:
14\. Flanagan
15\. Moors
16\. Payten
17\. Fifita

now that galloway is out injured and lui is fit to play my team would be:

1\. Ryan
2\. Tuqiri
3\. Lawrence
4\. Ayshford
5\. Pritchard
6\. Marshall (vc)
7\. Lui
8\. Gibbs
9\. Farah ©
10\. Payten
11\. Ellis
12\. Fulton
13\. Heighington

interchange:
14\. Flanagan
15\. Davis
16\. Moors
17\. Fifita

You do realise that the team has been named and Fitzy is starting on the wing regardless of Galloway being injured. God only knows why you've named Pritchard and Davis after the fact.
 
The team sheets were pre printed at the start of the year with fitzy on them and 16 blanks, we are saving money cant afford to get them re printed so sheens is under instructions from the boards to pick him every week. Cant think of any other explanation
 
@willow said:
@alien said:
@alien said:
1\. Ryan
2\. Tuqiri
3\. Lawrence
4\. Ayshford
5\. Pritchard
6\. Marshall (vc)
7\. Taumata
8\. Gibbs
9\. Farah ©
10\. Galloway
11\. Ellis
12\. Fulton
13\. Heighington

interchange:
14\. Flanagan
15\. Moors
16\. Payten
17\. Fifita

now that galloway is out injured and lui is fit to play my team would be:

1\. Ryan
2\. Tuqiri
3\. Lawrence
4\. Ayshford
5\. Pritchard
6\. Marshall (vc)
7\. Lui
8\. Gibbs
9\. Farah ©
10\. Payten
11\. Ellis
12\. Fulton
13\. Heighington

interchange:
14\. Flanagan
15\. Davis
16\. Moors
17\. Fifita

You do realise that the team has been named and Fitzy is starting on the wing regardless of Galloway being injured. God only knows why you've named Pritchard and Davis after the fact.

Reading definitely isn't one of your strong points Willow. This is thread is about who you wish was in the 17, not who you think will be.
 
@fergiefurr said:
Great idea replacing a prop with a center, is that you tim sheens?

We are running out of props. Davis has been playing alot of second row for Wests Magpies so he would come on as a second rower. He could play centre if we get an injury there.

I like Moors better in the second row than in the front row but he might have to play some front row this week.
 
Haha! Is wishing and thinking who will be in the team two different things or the one and the same since they are both done before the fact and without prior knowledge of who is actually named in the team? The fact that you're still naming your "wishlist" team after the official team has been named says it all really. Your grammar needs work too alien.
 
@willow said:
Haha! Is wishing and thinking who will be in the team two different things or the one and the same since they are both done before the fact and without prior knowledge of who is actually named in the team? The fact that you're still naming your "wishlist" team after the official team has been named says it all really. Your grammar needs work too alien.

It is 2 different things. It doesn't matter if Sheens has already named his side. This thread is for people saying what they wished the 17 was for this week. Why are you giving me such a hard time lately anyway?
 
@alien said:
@willow said:
Haha! Is wishing and thinking who will be in the team two different things or the one and the same since they are both done before the fact and without prior knowledge of who is actually named in the team? The fact that you're still naming your "wishlist" team after the official team has been named says it all really. Your grammar needs work too alien.

It is 2 different things. It doesn't matter if Sheens has already named his side. This thread is for people saying what they wished the 17 was for this week. Why are you giving me such a hard time lately anyway?

Have to agree to disagree then alien. Thinking who will be named and dreaming who will be named are pretty much the same thing. Personally I don't see any point in naming "dream teams" after the official team has already been named, when clearly the dream team options we throw forward each week are essentially tossed out the window once the official side is named.

Anyway, if you're adamant on naming players who aren't in this week's team, so be it. :sign:
 
It's supposed to be what team you would have picked if you were the coach. I guess it's just another way of discussing who you think should be in the side and in what position. In the first post of the thread it says "what's your team for Round 10?"
 
@alien said:
It's supposed to be what team you would have picked if you were the coach. I guess it's just another way of discussing who you think should be in the side and in what position. In the first post of the thread it says "what's your team for Round 10?"

Yep, 100% agree with that first sentence. The thing is, this thread started last week during the bye and well before Sheens named his team. I guess the difference is I don't see any point in still naming dream teams after the official team has been named because our own speculation on who we want in the team becomes entirely irrelevant.
 
Back
Top