I see one problem and that is that we upgraded Brooks and Moses and I believe that NRL matches were incentivised into the contract, as was increases in salary per year. So that means that despite them being signed, their salaries are likely to increase markedly. They also would have both signed to pretty decent contracts for rookies. So suggesting that Blair going pays for Tedesco is wrong because Blair going probably pays for Brooks, Moses and Woods salary increases.
To compete with the offers that'll be coming in for both Tedesco and Nofoaluma, we're going to have to lose Blair, Anasta, Murdoch-Masila, Koroibete and probably won't be able to re-sign some others either because we'll need to promote others to fill their top spots on top of offering more of our cap to Tedesco and Nofoaluma.
Gavet, Paterson, Seumanufagai, Thompson and Sironen are off contract as well. Is re-signing Tedesco and Nofoaluma worth losing possibly 5 or 6 players and replacing them all with rookies to accommodate? I dunno, maybe?