Test Cricket Draft Game...*Banter Thread...

[tig_prmz]

A

 

[happy_tiger]

A

C told you I get it right Geo

 

[Geo]

I think swag is in detention…

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

When we're scoring, or ranking players, whatever system it is, are we also commenting on the players? I think it would be good for people to justify why they are judging players the way they do.

In the past we haven't enforced it, however some people have placed very good players low down on the list for various reasons (i.e. drug use or whatever) and have written something to go with that the justify themselves. It's up to the voter whether they choose to justify their opinion or not

I think it would be helpful to provide a small blurb on why.

 

[Sabre]

I think swag is in detention…

I'm still waiting for him to figure out there are 11 players in a cricket team and not 10.

 

[swag_tiger]

I think swag is in detention…

I'm still waiting for him to figure out there are 11 players in a cricket team and not 10.

I did that to see if you would find out the mistake and to see if you actually know the basics of cricket + i have never got a detention before in my life my parents call me a goody two shoes

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

I think swag is in detention…

I'm still waiting for him to figure out there are 11 players in a cricket team and not 10.

I did that to see if you would find out the mistake and to see if you actually know the basics of cricket + i have never got a detention before in my life my parents call me a goody two shoes

If you're a goody two shoes, how do you have swag?

 

[swag_tiger]

I think swag is in detention…

I'm still waiting for him to figure out there are 11 players in a cricket team and not 10.

I did that to see if you would find out the mistake and to see if you actually know the basics of cricket + i have never got a detention before in my life my parents call me a goody two shoes

If you're a goody two shoes, how do you have swag?

it was a bet to have swag in my name and i lost the bet

 

[Sabre]

I think swag is in detention…

I'm still waiting for him to figure out there are 11 players in a cricket team and not 10.

I did that to see if you would find out the mistake and to see if you actually know the basics of cricket + i have never got a detention before in my life my parents call me a goody two shoes

This could potentially be the weirdest post I have ever read on this forum.
1, for the cover up of you obviously making an error or not knowing there are 11 players on a team.
2, for the quote "i have never got a detention before in my life my parents call me a goody two shoes"

 

[Cultured_Bogan]

BenjiMagic Mk. II

 

[GNR4LIFE]

When we're scoring, or ranking players, whatever system it is, are we also commenting on the players? I think it would be good for people to justify why they are judging players the way they do.

In the past we haven't enforced it, however some people have placed very good players low down on the list for various reasons (i.e. drug use or whatever) and have written something to go with that the justify themselves. It's up to the voter whether they choose to justify their opinion or not

I think it would be helpful to provide a small blurb on why.

I think it would add depth to the game and make it more interesting.

 

[happy_tiger]

When we're scoring, or ranking players, whatever system it is, are we also commenting on the players? I think it would be good for people to justify why they are judging players the way they do.

In the past we haven't enforced it, however some people have placed very good players low down on the list for various reasons (i.e. drug use or whatever) and have written something to go with that the justify themselves. It's up to the voter whether they choose to justify their opinion or not

I think it would be helpful to provide a small blurb on why.

I think it would add depth to the game and make it more interesting.

Yep Sounds good

Expect 11 "Because its Geo's player " :roll

 

[Geo]

In the past we haven't enforced it, however some people have placed very good players low down on the list for various reasons (i.e. drug use or whatever) and have written something to go with that the justify themselves. It's up to the voter whether they choose to justify their opinion or not

I think it would be helpful to provide a small blurb on why.

I think it would add depth to the game and make it more interesting.

Yep Sounds good

Expect 11 "Because its Geo's player " :roll

True colours shinning through there Dopey… :unamused:

 

[foreveratiger]

I'm waiting…...waiting.......waiting :laughing: . I've been ready since lunchtime .

tig_prmz wake up mate

 

[Sabre]

I'm waiting…...waiting.......waiting :laughing: . I've been ready since lunchtime .

tig_prmz wake up mate

Should be renamed the "Test Cricket and waiting for Tig_Prmz Draft Game". As that's whats taking up half the time.

 

[Pierre_M7]

I'm waiting…...waiting.......waiting :laughing: . I've been ready since lunchtime .

tig_prmz wake up mate

Should be renamed the "Test Cricket and waiting for Tig_Prmz Draft Game". As that's whats taking up half the time.

He'll probably reply in this thread but still keep us waiting by not having his go…

 

[GNR4LIFE]

I think swag is in detention…

I'm still waiting for him to figure out there are 11 players in a cricket team and not 10.

I did that to see if you would find out the mistake and to see if you actually know the basics of cricket + i have never got a detention before in my life my parents call me a goody two shoes

If you're a goody two shoes, how do you have swag?

Maybe because he's this kid

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRenlMwgWa8

 

[Geo]

I'm waiting…...waiting.......waiting :laughing: . I've been ready since lunchtime .

tig_prmz wake up mate

Found him…


 

[GNR4LIFE]

We should do a league one. There'd be no disputes then as you're putting players in their specific positions. Maybe something like players from 2000 onwards.

 

[Geo]

We should do a league one. There'd be no disputes then as you're putting players in their specific positions. Maybe something like players from 2000 onwards.

Yes you would think but we did 2 of them…both didn't end well... :laughing: