Tiger_Steve
New member
Mitchell Marsh called into test squad for Perth test. Not my favourite player
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
@ said:Mitchell Marsh called into test squad for Perth test. Not my favourite player
@ said:@ said:Mitchell Marsh called into test squad for Perth test. Not my favourite player
Who is he replacing?
@ said:@ said:Mitchell Marsh called into test squad for Perth test. Not my favourite player
Who is he replacing?
@ said:@ said:@ said:Mitchell Marsh called into test squad for Perth test. Not my favourite player
Who is he replacing?
Handscomb will most likely get the chop
@ said:@ said:6 wickets for 57 runs, comprehensive.
Aleem Duh should never umpire a Test match again. Makes Steve Bucknor look like Richard Kettleborough.
Happy now , same result just another way of getting the W , as my Math teacher used to say "there's more than one way to skin a cat "
You were starting to sound like that freak on the Forum last week that was losing the plot and wanting the board skinned and roasted
@ said:@ said:@ said:6 wickets for 57 runs, comprehensive.
Aleem Duh should never umpire a Test match again. Makes Steve Bucknor look like Richard Kettleborough.
Happy now , same result just another way of getting the W , as my Math teacher used to say "there's more than one way to skin a cat "
You were starting to sound like that freak on the Forum last week that was losing the plot and wanting the board skinned and roasted
Even Smith yesterday was hesitant when asked if he would do the same way again. Took him forever to answer and when he did he said "well, I got the win."
Fair enough he got the result, but hopefully he learns from it.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:6 wickets for 57 runs, comprehensive.
Aleem Duh should never umpire a Test match again. Makes Steve Bucknor look like Richard Kettleborough.
Happy now , same result just another way of getting the W , as my Math teacher used to say "there's more than one way to skin a cat "
You were starting to sound like that freak on the Forum last week that was losing the plot and wanting the board skinned and roasted
Even Smith yesterday was hesitant when asked if he would do the same way again. Took him forever to answer and when he did he said "well, I got the win."
Fair enough he got the result, but hopefully he learns from it.
Yeah I agree CB..given the same circumstances and conditions again I reckon he would of sent them back in…
I see the merit in not enforcing the follow on ...Workload on our Bowling attack is critical..because our batsmen for the most part are still struggling...it's only been individual innings from Smith and Marsh that have had us in good positions..
Poms seem to have no answer to our Bowlers tho..All of them have been exceptional..
@ said:@ said:@ said:6 wickets for 57 runs, comprehensive.
Aleem Duh should never umpire a Test match again. Makes Steve Bucknor look like Richard Kettleborough.
Happy now , same result just another way of getting the W , as my Math teacher used to say "there's more than one way to skin a cat "
You were starting to sound like that freak on the Forum last week that was losing the plot and wanting the board skinned and roasted
Even Smith yesterday was hesitant when asked if he would do the same way again. Took him forever to answer and when he did he said "well, I got the win."
Fair enough he got the result, but hopefully he learns from it.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Happy now , same result just another way of getting the W , as my Math teacher used to say "there's more than one way to skin a cat "
You were starting to sound like that freak on the Forum last week that was losing the plot and wanting the board skinned and roasted
Even Smith yesterday was hesitant when asked if he would do the same way again. Took him forever to answer and when he did he said "well, I got the win."
Fair enough he got the result, but hopefully he learns from it.
Yeah I agree CB..given the same circumstances and conditions again I reckon he would of sent them back in…
I see the merit in not enforcing the follow on ...Workload on our Bowling attack is critical..because our batsmen for the most part are still struggling...it's only been individual innings from Smith and Marsh that have had us in good positions..
Poms seem to have no answer to our Bowlers tho..All of them have been exceptional..
The only difference between Smith and Root was that Root adamantly backed his decision to field first (which you've got to do when you lose.)
If we were on day 4 of the Perth Test I could understand having another bat. But it was Adelaide, rather mild conditions, night session so even cooler again and the guys bowled a combined 75 overs or something to that effect. Garry bowled 24 of them and Starc bowled 20 so they weren't run off their feet.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Even Smith yesterday was hesitant when asked if he would do the same way again. Took him forever to answer and when he did he said "well, I got the win."
Fair enough he got the result, but hopefully he learns from it.
Yeah I agree CB..given the same circumstances and conditions again I reckon he would of sent them back in…
I see the merit in not enforcing the follow on ...Workload on our Bowling attack is critical..because our batsmen for the most part are still struggling...it's only been individual innings from Smith and Marsh that have had us in good positions..
Poms seem to have no answer to our Bowlers tho..All of them have been exceptional..
The only difference between Smith and Root was that Root adamantly backed his decision to field first (which you've got to do when you lose.)
If we were on day 4 of the Perth Test I could understand having another bat. But it was Adelaide, rather mild conditions, night session so even cooler again and the guys bowled a combined 75 overs or something to that effect. Garry bowled 24 of them and Starc bowled 20 so they weren't run off their feet.
It's still all if's but's and maybe's tho …I think I said given the same conditions on reflection Smith may have made a different decision..he has said as much while still backing his call not to send em back in
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Even Smith yesterday was hesitant when asked if he would do the same way again. Took him forever to answer and when he did he said "well, I got the win."
Fair enough he got the result, but hopefully he learns from it.
Yeah I agree CB..given the same circumstances and conditions again I reckon he would of sent them back in…
I see the merit in not enforcing the follow on ...Workload on our Bowling attack is critical..because our batsmen for the most part are still struggling...it's only been individual innings from Smith and Marsh that have had us in good positions..
Poms seem to have no answer to our Bowlers tho..All of them have been exceptional..
The only difference between Smith and Root was that Root adamantly backed his decision to field first (which you've got to do when you lose.)
If we were on day 4 of the Perth Test I could understand having another bat. But it was Adelaide, rather mild conditions, night session so even cooler again and the guys bowled a combined 75 overs or something to that effect. Garry bowled 24 of them and Starc bowled 20 so they weren't run off their feet.
It's still all if's but's and maybe's tho …I think I said given the same conditions on reflection Smith may have made a different decision..he has said as much while still backing his call not to send em back in
@ said:The WACCA hasn’t been fast and bouncing quickly for a few years now. It’s turned into a bit of a road. Handscomb will most likely get dropped. For someone that could bowl 10 overs in an innings.
Iooks like it might be Mitch Marsh in. How about Maxwell? Unlucky not to be included in the squad. Jackson Bird is in the squad. So if it’s a real road there could be a possibility of Aust moving Cummins above Starc in the batting order and playing four quicks as well as Lyon.
However M Marsh is most likely to be included
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:Yeah I agree CB..given the same circumstances and conditions again I reckon he would of sent them back in…
I see the merit in not enforcing the follow on ...Workload on our Bowling attack is critical..because our batsmen for the most part are still struggling...it's only been individual innings from Smith and Marsh that have had us in good positions..
Poms seem to have no answer to our Bowlers tho..All of them have been exceptional..
The only difference between Smith and Root was that Root adamantly backed his decision to field first (which you've got to do when you lose.)
If we were on day 4 of the Perth Test I could understand having another bat. But it was Adelaide, rather mild conditions, night session so even cooler again and the guys bowled a combined 75 overs or something to that effect. Garry bowled 24 of them and Starc bowled 20 so they weren't run off their feet.
It's still all if's but's and maybe's tho …I think I said given the same conditions on reflection Smith may have made a different decision..he has said as much while still backing his call not to send em back in
The result was never in doubt . Steve Smith is a champion bloke and player… he's going to be a better skipper than the two previous flogs in Ponting and Clarke , you won by 120 runs yet you's still whinge harder than any poms .
:laughing:
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:The only difference between Smith and Root was that Root adamantly backed his decision to field first (which you've got to do when you lose.)
If we were on day 4 of the Perth Test I could understand having another bat. But it was Adelaide, rather mild conditions, night session so even cooler again and the guys bowled a combined 75 overs or something to that effect. Garry bowled 24 of them and Starc bowled 20 so they weren't run off their feet.
It's still all if's but's and maybe's tho …I think I said given the same conditions on reflection Smith may have made a different decision..he has said as much while still backing his call not to send em back in
The result was never in doubt . Steve Smith is a champion bloke and player… he's going to be a better skipper than the two previous flogs in Ponting and Clarke , you won by 120 runs yet you's still whinge harder than any poms .
:laughing:
I don't think it physically possible to whinge harder than the Poms. I've been tuning into the BBC radio coverage for some Schadenfreude when we're on top. No praise for the Aussies there. Everything seems to come down to luck according to those guys. They whinge about the kookaburra ball, the weather, the Aussies batting and bowling it's hilarious. They are world champion whingers. I think they secretly like loosing so they can whinge.
@ said:@ said:@ said:@ said:It's still all if's but's and maybe's tho …I think I said given the same conditions on reflection Smith may have made a different decision..he has said as much while still backing his call not to send em back in
The result was never in doubt . Steve Smith is a champion bloke and player… he's going to be a better skipper than the two previous flogs in Ponting and Clarke , you won by 120 runs yet you's still whinge harder than any poms .
:laughing:
I don't think it physically possible to whinge harder than the Poms. I've been tuning into the BBC radio coverage for some Schadenfreude when we're on top. No praise for the Aussies there. Everything seems to come down to luck according to those guys. They whinge about the kookaburra ball, the weather, the Aussies batting and bowling it's hilarious. They are world champion whingers. I think they secretly like loosing so they can whinge.
What do you expect listening to the BBC :laughing:
Believe me the Aussies whinge just as much as the English if not more !
Just read some of happy Tigers posts :laughing:
P.s the Kookaburra ball is an inferior product to the Duke ball , always has been :smiley: