The Commentators

Most commentators saw it the same way. No real difference to the Levi try where there was no clear video, just the peanut was in a better view. It was exactly the same they were both tries, it was obvious. But cool hide behind your technicalities, all good!
I agree that Levi got the ball down; but it was not played on the mark. It was played behind the marker so should have been bought back for the infringement.
 
Most commentators saw it the same way. No real difference to the Levi try where there was no clear video, just the peanut was in a better view. It was exactly the same they were both tries, it was obvious. But cool hide behind your technicalities, all good!
There is a difference though . The ref made a mistake sending the try up as no try , and if you think about it from his perspective ie. he wants to make the most correct decision , he changed his approach to the same situation.
The problem is we didn’t benefit from his correction in behaviour . Hence all this talk about it .
But IMO it can also be viewed that he does have an agenda . The agenda being he gets graded on all his screw ups and wants to maintain refereeing in first grade .
 
I still don't get why Seyfarth was sin binned.
He was called out of the play and pulled back his arms to let the Canberra player run past him. How does that become a professional foul?
Because he grabbed him before he pulled his arms back.
 
Cronk, in my opinion must be the worst commentator out at the moment. Never utters a positive word about the Tigers, and when we play well he blames it on the deficiencies of the opposition. A complete tool
 
A little bit off topic but for once I felt they were a little too pro Tigers against the Raiders.

Gould keeps talking us up, even in his podcast. Smells fishy to me
That’s one positive thing about Gould for me, he is never anti Tigers in any of his commentary. In fact, like you said, he is often too much pro Tigers, but I’ll happily take that since just about every other meat head commentator go to pains to find fault in us.
 
That’s one positive thing about Gould for me, he is never anti Tigers in any of his commentary. In fact, like you said, he is often too much pro Tigers, but I’ll happily take that since just about every other meat head commentator go to pains to find fault in us.

I feel like he has a soft spot for us. For so long, we were the most entertaining team to watch on a Sunday arvo. Growing up I remember him and Vossy basically being in awe of us throwing the ball around.
 
I feel like he has a soft spot for us. For so long, we were the most entertaining team to watch on a Sunday arvo. Growing up I remember him and Vossy basically being in awe of us throwing the ball around.

I have always thought that Gould was one of the more realistic commentators in regards to us and often praised and respected us as a club
 
I just wish that instead of blathering on about everything but the footy, they would call the game! Name the player who has the ball, who they pass to, who makes the tackle, what tackle number it is, and at the end of the set, tell me the score! Especially the radio callers. They dribble on about what their missus had for dinner, then do a big "oooohhhhhh!!!" then back to a message from the sponsor. It's so annoying!!!
 
I just wish that instead of blathering on about everything but the footy, they would call the game! Name the player who has the ball, who they pass to, who makes the tackle, what tackle number it is, and at the end of the set, tell me the score! Especially the radio callers. They dribble on about what their missus had for dinner, then do a big "oooohhhhhh!!!" then back to a message from the sponsor. It's so annoying!!!
Most of the players have such stupid names, they can’t keep up.
 

Latest posts

Staff online

Back
Top