The Ref

[Wounded_magpie]

So did Annersley comment on this game? Be very interested to see what he said about it....

Watching it I thought MCK's ball carrying arm didn't hit the ground and he wasn't called held so it should've been play on....at the very least he should've played advantage and if we scored referred it to the video ref....

Despite a couple of 50/50 not going our way....there was a lot of fair penalties and 6 agains that we conceded which caused us to lose.....our discipline should've been much better

He sure did. He confirmed Sutton should have allowed the Tigers to use the Captains Challenge for Chee Kam’s incident.

 

[Wounded_magpie]

Annesley’s Round 5 Briefing (a looooong one):

• Carrigan strip correct
• Klemmer penalty incorrect
• Tigers should have been allowed to challenge Chee-Kam call

 

[Geo]

Unless they start to take action and demote the Refs who make these errors to running the touch line it' means bugger all..in fact it's counter productive even to admit errors as it further frustrates fans as nothing seems to be done..

Like yeah thanks Mr Annersley we all feel better now..

They have so called experienced Refs running the touchline but you know Sutton, Checcin and Gee will be there every week..it's just a big up yours to fans

 

[happy_tiger]

Unless they start to take action and demote the Refs who make these errors to running the touch line it' means bugger all..in fact it's counter productive even to admit errors as it further frustrates fans as nothing seems to be done..

Like yeah thanks Mr Annersley we all feel better now..

They have so called experienced Refs running the touchline but you know Sutton, Checcin and Gee will be there every week..it's just a big up yours to fans

Wonder what Josh and Belinda were discussing after our try

 

[Harvey]

Bugger Annesley, after he confirms incorrect decisions, they should make the referees front up and explain why they made the decision that did. A forward pass wrong I can understand, but to suggest a call can't be challenged is either self protection, corruption or not knowing the rules. All of these reason are indefensible and should result in the ref being dropped.

 

[supercoach]

The six again call has given the refs so much influence on results, and the calls never come under the microscope because the game has moved on and the broadcasters don’t have time to showcase the infringement.

It seems to be just a random call the ref makes as every second tackle teams are trying to slow the ruck and most times they get away with it. We seem to get about 20 minutes with nothing than they hit a team three times in three sets.

Also I thing I have noticed is some teams are getting off the line so quickly in defence by being constantly offside. The Chooks last nigh t were offside half the night. With one ref you can get away with it.

Not sure what the answer is but I guess the good teams win what ever the rules are

 

[Spud_Murphy]

Bugger Annesley, after he confirms incorrect decisions, they should make the referees front up and explain why they made the decision that did. A forward pass wrong I can understand, but to suggest a call can't be challenged is either self protection, corruption or not knowing the rules. All of these reason are indefensible and should result in the ref being dropped.

It’s just plain cheating is what it is and yes he should be dropped.

Sutton was arrogant and condescending towards us for the whole game. He should be fined and dropped - might think twice about doing it again then, but no punishment means he will just continue on his merry way officiating matches with blatant bias.

 

[Harvey]

Bugger Annesley, after he confirms incorrect decisions, they should make the referees front up and explain why they made the decision that did. A forward pass wrong I can understand, but to suggest a call can't be challenged is either self protection, corruption or not knowing the rules. All of these reason are indefensible and should result in the ref being dropped.

It’s just plain cheating is what it is and yes he should be dropped.

Sutton was arrogant and condescending towards us for the whole game. He should be fined and dropped - might think twice about doing it again then, but no punishment means he will just continue on his merry way officiating matches with blatant bias.

He is part of the Sutton clan, no demotion for him. As it his he has been promoted far beyond his abilities. If PVL is serious, the refereeing administration should be next in line for a clean out.

 

[BZN]

The Harry Grant forward pass from dummy half getting pulled up was laughable. See at least 20 of them per game that are forward from the PTB. When you are getting pinged for them you know your team's cards are marked for the game.
Get receding Cammy out there....he gets away with them.

Nah that one was forward mate . I get your point though . Go watch it again . Usually the dummy half gets his hands in front of the player running onto the ball . Grant does it all the time . Twal just got too far in front so there was no “framing” of the pass.

@Strongee ....mate!....that pass by Grant can't possibly have been forward, cause Cammy would have shown him how to pass the ball proper, and as we know....he aint ever thrown a forward pass....just ask the referees....they know cause Cammy tells them he Never throws forward passes.

Lol . Hey man , I just try to be honest about things , and not let my bias get in the way of the truth . Hypothetically if we were to hire Cammy as an assistant coach would we then get the run , if he does the Alfie langer running behind the defence the whole game ? ... just asking for a friend

[/QUOTE]

Your posts are always fair and balanced Mate, no problem there at all.
Re Cammy doing an Alfie for Wests Tigers, he is only allowed on the field of play
on 3 occasions in each half now, excepting when there is an injury of course, so Alfies/Cammys job will have much less impact from now on, so my Aunty Gladys may as well run behind the team.
I hope your friend is satisfied with my answer.

 

[Deleted member 3518]

The Harry Grant forward pass from dummy half getting pulled up was laughable. See at least 20 of them per game that are forward from the PTB. When you are getting pinged for them you know your team's cards are marked for the game.
Get receding Cammy out there....he gets away with them.

Nah that one was forward mate . I get your point though . Go watch it again . Usually the dummy half gets his hands in front of the player running onto the ball . Grant does it all the time . Twal just got too far in front so there was no “framing” of the pass.

@Strongee ....mate!....that pass by Grant can't possibly have been forward, cause Cammy would have shown him how to pass the ball proper, and as we know....he aint ever thrown a forward pass....just ask the referees....they know cause Cammy tells them he Never throws forward passes.

Lol . Hey man , I just try to be honest about things , and not let my bias get in the way of the truth . Hypothetically if we were to hire Cammy as an assistant coach would we then get the run , if he does the Alfie langer running behind the defence the whole game ? ... just asking for a friend

Your posts are always fair and balanced Mate, no problem there at all.
Re Cammy doing an Alfie for Wests Tigers, he is only allowed on the field of play
on 3 occasions in each half now, excepting when there is an injury of course, so Alfies/Cammys job will have much less impact from now on, so my Aunty Gladys may as well run behind the team.
I hope your friend is satisfied with my answer.

Yea , all good mate . I was just mucking around as well . I can’t see the NRL letting cammy badger the refs from 30m behind the defensive line . Even if he does have some weird photos of the NRL heirarchy stashed away in a security vault lol

 

[BZN]

Another manufactured result,Sutton seemed to know who was going to win before the game and refereeed accordingly.

I've got a bit of a feeling @jadtiger those manufactured results have been going on since the most famous one being the iconic 1963 G.F. where the late Great Noel Kelly said he overheard the referee (Darcy Lawler) telling someone? he would NOT let Wests Magpies win the game.

 

[tiger_one]

Another manufactured result,Sutton seemed to know who was going to win before the game and refereeed accordingly.

I've got a bit of a feeling @jadtiger those manufactured results have been going on since the most famous one being the iconic 1963 G.F. where the late Great Noel Kelly said he overheard the referee (Darcy Lawler) telling someone? he would NOT let Wests Magpies win the game.

And just to prove it, a Wests Magpies try was disallowed because of a bounced ball, when the mud was a foot deep!

 

[BZN]

Another manufactured result,Sutton seemed to know who was going to win before the game and refereeed accordingly.

I've got a bit of a feeling @jadtiger those manufactured results have been going on since the most famous one being the iconic 1963 G.F. where the late Great Noel Kelly said he overheard the referee (Darcy Lawler) telling someone? he would NOT let Wests Magpies win the game.

And just to prove it, a Wests Magpies try was disallowed because of a bounced ball, when the mud was a foot deep!

I was at the game @tiger_one and I reckon the mud was more like a metre deep which in the days of pounds, schillings and pence equates to 3ft 3 3/8 inches deep, and the Magpies should have buried Lawler in it.
When they dug him up in a 1000 years time as the mud and ice melted, the words
"no try" would have been still coming out of his mouth and frozen in time.