The Unbig 2

Masterton

Well-known member
“THEY’RE not the big four. They’re not the big four.”

At the end of a sobering day for the Wests Tigers this point was spat out by Peter Sterling, more than it was spoken.

Jason Taylor’s sacking brought to light the power a group of four coming-off-contract players - James Tedesco, Aaron Woods, Mitchell Moses and Luke Brooks - were wielding at Concord, a fact in itself the Parramatta great detests.

But it was more than just that player power had — according to plenty of people in the know, even if it was denied by the club — had its way with a coach that disturbed Sterling.

It was that a nickname for four greats (initially including Greg Inglis) of the game who have dominated Origin and Test level and won grand finals for the Storm had been so easily inherited by a group of four players whose combined achievements add up to very little.

“James Tedesco, absolutely. Origin player and excitement machine, one of the top 10 to 15 players in our game,” Sterling said on Triple M’s Dead Set Legends.

“Aaron Woods has been sensational for them. He’s taken on a heavy load for a couple of seasons and he’s been rewarded. I think rightly so.
\
\
'Players have too much power''
“There’s a question mark on the halves and whether or not they can take that next step.

“We thought that Mitchell Moses had last season and it was going to be even better this season. The question mark is on the six and seven.

“I don’t have any problems with the fullback or the front rower in terms of performance on a weekly basis.”

Sterling hit the nail on the head and here’s the proof.

Fox Sports Lab statistician Joel Carbone has devised a ratings system (Player Impact Scores) that uses key performance indicators in both attack and defence to give every player in the NRL an overall rating that changes from week to week.

The data he draws on is historical, meaning performances from two and three seasons ago are included, but more weighting is given to more recent performances.

Based on the clamour from the Tigers to keep Moses and Brooks at the club long-term, you’d think that at the very least they would be in the top 10 or 15 halves in the competition.

But according to their Player Impact Scores they’re not even close.

Currently, Moses sits 20th and Brooks is 34th. Cut-price mature age half Cody Walker (17th) is ahead of both of them, as are Nathan Cleary (18th) and Ash Taylor (19th), who are both younger than the Tigers pair and have been on the scene for considerably less time.

Of the NRL’s 32 regular starting halves, only Newcastle’s Brock Lamb (35th) and St George Illawarra’s Josh McCrone (39th) have lower ratings than Brooks.

That’s not encouraging, it’s damming. Yet the Tigers have seemingly put their fate into the hands of powerful player manager Isaac Moses, who manages each of the ‘big four’ and is asking the Tigers to risk roughly $800,000-a-year on Moses and $600,000-a-year on Brooks.

Those salaries would go some way to justifying the ‘big four’ tag, considering Tedesco will likely sign for somewhere around the $1 million mark and Woods’ salary will almost certainly clear $700,000.

But at this point it’s impossible to argue that the halves have put up performances to match.

THE MITCHELL MOSES CONCERN FOR 2017

The argument to back Mitchell Moses with a big contract for 2018 and beyond gathered steam last season as his performances trended upwards in a breakout year.

In 2016, Moses doubled his try assists (up from 11 to 22) and his tries (up from three to six) from the season before and returned significantly improved numbers in other key categories as well.

This was in contrast to Brooks who had until last year been considered the better of the two prospects.

Brooks had his worst season in terms of tries (he scored five compared to 10 and six in the previous two seasons), made fewer linebreaks and plateaued in the try assists category with 15, compared to 16 the year before and 12 the year before that.

A big area of concern, his defence, also failed to improve with Brooks making fewer tackles per game, while missing more — an unacceptable 3.8 per game, compared to 3.3 in 2015.

His relatively small frame will always make him a target in the defensive line, as demonstrated again when he was bulldozed by Junior Paulo as the Tigers conceded a try on Sunday.

Neither Brooks nor Moses has set the world on fire in attack this season but the bigger concern is Moses who seems to have dropped the standard he set for himself last year.

The dynamic five-eighth is still yet to register a try, a try assist, a linebreak or a linebreak assist in the 240 minutes he’s played this season.

That should have alarm bells ringing and will need to be addressed by the incoming coach quick smart.

Brooks has scored a try, and chalked up a try assist and linebreak assist in the first three games — better than Moses but still not the numbers of a world beater.

It’s why Sterling was so clearly cringing when he heard the pair grouped with Tedesco and Woods in a ‘big four’ that has never really existed.
\
\
http://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/teams/tigers/stats-insider-the-numbers-that-expose-the-myth-wests-tigers-have-a-big-four/news-story/459e8e9194440bd0ee85126f8c80e707
 
It's spot on..

but is what is also true is that this tag has been placed on them by the Media ..just as comparison with Immortals were placed on them…

I think it was Milky who bought up the point that Brooks played his best footy under Potter and had a great combination with Tedesco..but has gone backwards ...

It's up to them now to deliver consistently on what they are capable of or see you later..
 
Good article. Nice to see the stats backing up what most on here have been thinking regarding those two.
 
I don't post on here much. probably incur the wrath of some on here.
The only "Big" thing about the unbig 2 is their ego.
At the moment they talk the talk the talk, but don't walk the walk.
When they have played consistently outstanding footy for wests tigers and for rep teams, then and only then, would the be worth anymore than $250 K.
 
Here is what the so called big 4 should be offered(in order of importance)

1.Teddy 4years $1.1 m per year
2\. Woods 4 years $900k per year
3\. Moses 3 years ($700,$750,$800)
4\. Brooks 2 years $600, $700 incentive based)

I would also add that they cannot have Moses as their Manager…..
 
3.3m on 4 players? hell no.

Tedesco 900,000
woods 700,000
moses/brooks 400-500,000.

based on now. next contract they can ask for more if they play consistently..
 
Odd isn't it, Taylor gets a bullet and the media now turns on Broses. Been a while coming I suppose.
 
@ said:
I dont like the fact there all under one manager. Club should take a stand.

I am also concerned about that as well, but with developments of the last few days I'm starting to think differently.

Today's artical has pulled Brooks and Moses back a few pegs and it might just ruffle a few feathers for their manager. It could start some infighting if woods and teddy want to sign and Moses and brooks start to feel left out. We might still be able to divide and conquer.
 
tigerap - that is way overs.
Seantice - Woods/Moses and Brooks on those wages is probably too high. I think those guys are probably paid that now. They definitely shouldn't be looking for a pay rise.
 
I agree. The increase in the salary cap should firstly raise the minimum payment for frimge players, increase income for our absolute best players then increase for the inbetween players. Managers are making ridiculous calls about there players worth. Ie reynolds 800,000 and dugan 1.1 mill. These managers are using the press to put rumours about there players going to different clubs to put up the amount.

Im sorry but management needs to not pay overs.. Otherwise we will not have a team that can go all the way…
 
is woods really worth the type of money being thrown about? I just don't get the love affair with this bloke.

Does that mean pigs like graham,papali, tomou , cooper, Scott etc…are on 700k plus? And if they are, woods should be on substantially less imho.
 
Let Cleary make the call he is the only one remotely qualified to deal with player contracts.
 
@ said:
Here is what the so called big 4 should be offered(in order of importance)

1.Teddy 4years $1.1 m per year
2\. Woods 4 years $900k per year
3\. Moses 3 years ($700,$750,$800)
4\. Brooks 2 years $600, $700 incentive based)

I would also add that they cannot have Moses as their Manager…..

All of those figures are overs. Even for Ted.
 
@ said:
is woods really worth the type of money being thrown about? I just don't get the love affair with this bloke.

Does that mean pigs like graham,papali, tomou , cooper, Scott etc…are on 700k plus? And if they are, woods should be on substantially less imho.

Graham and Papalii I would guess yes.

You rate Gavin Cooper, who is a backrower BTW, higher value than Woods?
 
@ said:
@ said:
Here is what the so called big 4 should be offered(in order of importance)

1.Teddy 4years $1.1 m per year
2\. Woods 4 years $900k per year
3\. Moses 3 years ($700,$750,$800)
4\. Brooks 2 years $600, $700 incentive based)

I would also add that they cannot have Moses as their Manager…..

All of those figures are overs. Even for Ted.

If you added in TPA's I reckon the Woods and Teddy figures are spot on
 
@ said:
Let Cleary make the call he is the only one remotely qualified to deal with player contracts.

Agreed..

It is an interesting scenario now…the players want clarity on the coach...If it is to be Cleary I would imagine part of his acceptance would be a condition he gets control of the roster ....

I wouldn't be giving a timeframe on these guys until the coach is known..

If he wants all 4 and they then re-sign does that mean his 1st decision is a dud one as according to most Brooks at least should be let go...with Moses also borderline...
 
@ said:
@ said:
Let Cleary make the call he is the only one remotely qualified to deal with player contracts.

Agreed..

It is an interesting scenario now…the players want clarity on the coach...If it is to be Cleary I would imagine part of his acceptance would be a condition he gets control of the roster ....

I wouldn't be giving a timeframe on these guys until the coach is known..

If he wants all 4 and they then re-sign does that mean his 1st decision is a dud one as according to most Brooks at least should be let go...with Moses also borderline...

Easiest way to get an answer would be ask McQueen ….I reckon he might know :bulb:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top