Tigers board to undertake post-season review

@tiger5150 said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475648) said:
@tonytiger said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475636) said:
@swordy said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1471522) said:
@demps said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1469268) said:
https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/jimmy-brings/nrl-2021-james-hooper-column-jimmy-brings-luke-brooks-wests-tigers-michael-maguire-st-george-illawarra-kikau-tariq-sims/news-story/a65ed58c0eedbb7f2b6ff711ab748a9a?utm_source=nrl_sportsmail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=crm

Ok. So Hooper or Rothfiled are liars. (or both)

Hooper reports Sheens is involved in the review as part of his new role at the club.

Rothfield reports he spoke to someone who advised him that Sheens doesn't know when he is coming here or what his role is with the club.

Hmmm.....

You’ll get a different recollection from Rothfield if he ever sobers up - he’s also a sarcastic maggot looking for a rise out of everyone.
Mark Levy also likes putting the boot into the Tigers.
He’s such a light weight, he tried to emulate Ray Hadley.
There was a Mark Levy playing for Balmain in the 80s - not sure is he is the same guy but teams has to play-off during the week to decide who qualifies for the semi finals (no points differential back then) - anyway Mark Levy missed a conversion straight in front of the posts at full time for Balmain against Parramatta which would have seen Balmain qualified for the semis - (Balmain lost by one point as a result) —- the next year Levy went to Parramatta. Does anyone know if this is the same clown?

I dont think it is the same guy.

Thanks mate
 
@tiger-tragic said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475666) said:
@masterton said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475652) said:
@2005magic said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475564) said:
Ive read somewhere- probably on this thread, that the Board has the report nut are undecided on what to do.

I suspect what they decide to do depends very much on which coaches are interested. Madge may be gifted another season if the biggest competition is Flanno and Green.

I don't think any of us know where the review is up to and that's fair to the process, I suppose. That it's dragged on longer than we were led to believe shows how Chairman Mouth has let us all down again.

But, I also don't think that Maguire can be retained as a "least worst" option. Either he is capable of fulfilling his contract, or he isn't. Either he gets the complete authority and endorsement from the Board to fulfil duites as the NRL coach, or he doesn't.

How does the outcome of Maguire "at least not being Green or Flannagan" help him coach with certainty and confidence in 2022? It can't, in my opinion.

And, just to be clear, I prefer him to be retained than removed.

If we end up with Green, I will be extremely disappointed. If we end up up with Flanagan my support for the club will change.
 
@tiger-tragic said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475666) said:
@masterton said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475652) said:
@2005magic said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475564) said:
Ive read somewhere- probably on this thread, that the Board has the report nut are undecided on what to do.

I suspect what they decide to do depends very much on which coaches are interested. Madge may be gifted another season if the biggest competition is Flanno and Green.

I don't think any of us know where the review is up to and that's fair to the process, I suppose. That it's dragged on longer than we were led to believe shows how Chairman Mouth has let us all down again.

Why?

Shouldnt the review take as long as it takes and just end up with the best result?


But, I also don't think that Maguire can be retained as a "least worst" option. Either he is capable of fulfilling his contract, or he isn't. Either he gets the complete authority and endorsement from the Board to fulfil duites as the NRL coach, or he doesn't.

How does the outcome of Maguire "at least not being Green or Flannagan" help him coach with certainty and confidence in 2022? It can't, in my opinion.

So you are suggesting that if they are unhappy with Madges performance, results, status with the players, capacity to attract new players, that they should replace him with an inferior option? How does that make us better?


And, just to be clear, I prefer him to be retained than removed.

I prefer that the club has the best man possible in the role.
 
the longer the delay the more likely the status quo is NOT going to be retained.Were either sorting out payouts or availabilities
Not sure its a job for a rookie coach,even with Sheens involved as coaching director.
For mine,Wollf has done a great job at everything hes touched,and importantly seems to elicit senior player loyalty..exactly what we need.Hes my top choice,but...given Sheens has been trying to get out of UK for 2 months,Wollf probably in same boat(pardon the pun)...
Next choice is Morris reporting into Sheens..he'll do a solid job for a couple of years,and wont disappoint
Flanagan/Green as unappealing as retaining Madge
If Ciraldo had lost last nite there wld be no interest whatsover
 
@tonytiger said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475636) said:
@swordy said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1471522) said:
@demps said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1469268) said:
https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/jimmy-brings/nrl-2021-james-hooper-column-jimmy-brings-luke-brooks-wests-tigers-michael-maguire-st-george-illawarra-kikau-tariq-sims/news-story/a65ed58c0eedbb7f2b6ff711ab748a9a?utm_source=nrl_sportsmail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=crm

Ok. So Hooper or Rothfiled are liars. (or both)

Hooper reports Sheens is involved in the review as part of his new role at the club.

Rothfield reports he spoke to someone who advised him that Sheens doesn't know when he is coming here or what his role is with the club.

Hmmm.....

You’ll get a different recollection from Rothfield if he ever sobers up - he’s also a sarcastic maggot looking for a rise out of everyone.
Mark Levy also likes putting the boot into the Tigers.
He’s such a light weight, he tried to emulate Ray Hadley.
There was a Mark Levy playing for Balmain in the 80s - not sure is he is the same guy but teams has to play-off during the week to decide who qualifies for the semi finals (no points differential back then) - anyway Mark Levy missed a conversion straight in front of the posts at full time for Balmain against Parramatta which would have seen Balmain qualified for the semis - (Balmain lost by one point as a result) —- the next year Levy went to Parramatta. Does anyone know if this is the same clown?

Different bloke.... But for aong time I wondered the same thing
I had his footy card... Had a crook haircut
 
@jirskyr said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475602) said:
@plisskin said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475580) said:
@magpies1963 said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475569) said:
@plisskin said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475513) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475160) said:
@plisskin said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475153) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475083) said:
@plisskin said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1474925) said:
@boonboon said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1474924) said:
Club undecided amd review is continuing. Want to be sure if they do sack Madge that they can get a better option. 2 key concerns are defence and recruitment and even if its just perception about players not wanting to come and play for Madge if that perception of him has become reality. Board understands the move to youth and supportive but are worried their doesent seem to be a good plan around the defence and making it better.

An organised operation would have explored these options, understanding their viability well before the review began.
Just another example of incompetence with this lot.

How unprofessional do you think it would look (to a prospective coach or player) to begin these machinations whilst the competition was still live?

I understand that the club is unsuccessful and going badly, I understand that it seems endemic and has been going on for 10 years now and people hate the board for it, but what the board is actually doing right now, is exactly what they should be doing and if they werent, we should be jumoing up and down.

They aren’t doing ***what you think they are.***
If they were, Pascoe and Hartigan would both be under scrutiny.
What we are seeing is a poorly conducted and needlessly lengthened witch-hunt.

Adam Baldwin, you seem to have a long history of knowing what I think and also not answering my questions. What do I think again?

Have you ever asked me a question worth answering?

WOW!!! you've been here for one day and it seems to me you feel you need to control our Forum.
I'm putting a red flag on this blokes posts.

Lol you have upvoted at least a dozen of my posts and now you claim this? What happened?

He upvotes everyone.
[/QUOTE]

@jirskyr :relaxed said:
So if anyone gets a down-vote from me, its for a pretty good reason as I dont award down-votes to just anyone.
So I hope Yuh feel special for a little while at least @Plisskin.
But from the tone of you most recent posts, I've got a feeling :thinking_face: I'll have occasions to help you feel better in the future :joy:
 
@tiger5150 said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475622) said:
@magpies1963 said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475569) said:
@plisskin said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475513) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475160) said:
@plisskin said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475153) said:
@tiger5150 said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475083) said:
@plisskin said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1474925) said:
@boonboon said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1474924) said:
Club undecided amd review is continuing. Want to be sure if they do sack Madge that they can get a better option. 2 key concerns are defence and recruitment and even if its just perception about players not wanting to come and play for Madge if that perception of him has become reality. Board understands the move to youth and supportive but are worried their doesent seem to be a good plan around the defence and making it better.

An organised operation would have explored these options, understanding their viability well before the review began.
Just another example of incompetence with this lot.

How unprofessional do you think it would look (to a prospective coach or player) to begin these machinations whilst the competition was still live?

I understand that the club is unsuccessful and going badly, I understand that it seems endemic and has been going on for 10 years now and people hate the board for it, but what the board is actually doing right now, is exactly what they should be doing and if they werent, we should be jumoing up and down.

They aren’t doing ***what you think they are.***
If they were, Pascoe and Hartigan would both be under scrutiny.
What we are seeing is a poorly conducted and needlessly lengthened witch-hunt.

Adam Baldwin, you seem to have a long history of knowing what I think and also not answering my questions. What do I think again?

Have you ever asked me a question worth answering?

WOW!!! you've been here for one day and it seems to me you feel you need to control our Forum.
I'm putting a red flag on this blokes posts.

He has been here a lot longer than a day '63. Lets see how this alt goes.

Thanks @tigers5150 I missed the word Alt.
Does that mean he has been on here before under a different user name?
 
@tiger5150 said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475624) said:
@coivtny said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475579) said:
Sounds a bit like animal-mother is back.

Well spotted.

Ok, I think I get it now @Tiger5150 , and if it is animal-mother I'm pretty sure I haven't up-voted any of his posts.
 
Michael Maguire’s time as Wests Tigers coach is on the brink of coming to an end with the Tigers closing in on making a call on the under-siege mentor.

News Corp has learnt that Maguire is expected to have coached his last game unless there is a last minute shift among the club’s hierarchy.

Penrith assistant coach Cameron Ciraldo is the front-runner for the job, but it is unlikely that he will pursue the opportunity.

Instead Englishmen Steve McNamara and Shaun Wane, plus Aussie St Helens coach Kristian Woolf are among the leading candidates should the Tigers pull the trigger on Maguire.

The Tigers board met for the first time last week since the famed review into the Tigers’ 2021 season was completed. They asked for further recommendations from the football committee. Those recommendations need to be put to the board.

It will now be left to the board to make a final decision. While Maguire had some strong support initially, there has been a mood shift in recent days.

That shift could culminate in Maguire being axed despite two years remaining on his deal.

There is little doubt that the Tigers want to speak with Ciraldo. He has indicated he won’t pursue any opportunities until his commitments with the Panthers end, which will happen within the next fortnight.

The Tigers have put a total recruitment and retention freeze while they make a decision on their coach. They have been linked to Adam Elliott and Tariq Sims but are unable to make genuine plays for the back-rowers because of the ongoing uncertainty surrounding their coach.

Maguire’s position has come under fire because of the Tigers slide under his watch. They finished ninth in his first season in charge before dipping two spots last year. They slumped to 13th on the competition ladder this year.

Despite his lean record, he now sits second to Tim Sheens for the most games coached at the joint-venture.

Sheens was brought in this year and is expected to have an expanded coaching role at the club in 2022.

If Maguire is sacked, the Tigers will be onto their sixth coach since Sheens was dumped in 2012.

Quote 1
 
@innsaneink said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475748) said:
Hooper on MMM saying Madge gone next week

Haha because he’s expecting Penrith to be knocked out next week
 
@littlebittipsy said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475772) said:
Michael Maguire’s time as Wests Tigers coach is on the brink of coming to an end with the Tigers closing in on making a call on the under-siege mentor.

News Corp has learnt that Maguire is expected to have coached his last game unless there is a last minute shift among the club’s hierarchy.

Penrith assistant coach Cameron Ciraldo is the front-runner for the job, but it is unlikely that he will pursue the opportunity.

Instead Englishmen Steve McNamara and Shaun Wane, plus Aussie St Helens coach Kristian Woolf are among the leading candidates should the Tigers pull the trigger on Maguire.

The Tigers board met for the first time last week since the famed review into the Tigers’ 2021 season was completed. They asked for further recommendations from the football committee. Those recommendations need to be put to the board.

It will now be left to the board to make a final decision. While Maguire had some strong support initially, there has been a mood shift in recent days.

That shift could culminate in Maguire being axed despite two years remaining on his deal.

There is little doubt that the Tigers want to speak with Ciraldo. He has indicated he won’t pursue any opportunities until his commitments with the Panthers end, which will happen within the next fortnight.

The Tigers have put a total recruitment and retention freeze while they make a decision on their coach. They have been linked to Adam Elliott and Tariq Sims but are unable to make genuine plays for the back-rowers because of the ongoing uncertainty surrounding their coach.

Maguire’s position has come under fire because of the Tigers slide under his watch. They finished ninth in his first season in charge before dipping two spots last year. They slumped to 13th on the competition ladder this year.

Despite his lean record, he now sits second to Tim Sheens for the most games coached at the joint-venture.

Sheens was brought in this year and is expected to have an expanded coaching role at the club in 2022.

**If Maguire is sacked, the Tigers will be onto their sixth coach since Sheens was dumped in 2012.**

Quote 1

That's less than 2 years for each coach?
You would have to wonder what reasonable coach would want to come and have his career destroyed?

But, I'm sure someone will.
 
@tigerwest said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475845) said:
@littlebittipsy said in [Tigers board to undertake post\-season review](/post/1475772) said:
Michael Maguire’s time as Wests Tigers coach is on the brink of coming to an end with the Tigers closing in on making a call on the under-siege mentor.

News Corp has learnt that Maguire is expected to have coached his last game unless there is a last minute shift among the club’s hierarchy.

Penrith assistant coach Cameron Ciraldo is the front-runner for the job, but it is unlikely that he will pursue the opportunity.

Instead Englishmen Steve McNamara and Shaun Wane, plus Aussie St Helens coach Kristian Woolf are among the leading candidates should the Tigers pull the trigger on Maguire.

The Tigers board met for the first time last week since the famed review into the Tigers’ 2021 season was completed. They asked for further recommendations from the football committee. Those recommendations need to be put to the board.

It will now be left to the board to make a final decision. While Maguire had some strong support initially, there has been a mood shift in recent days.

That shift could culminate in Maguire being axed despite two years remaining on his deal.

There is little doubt that the Tigers want to speak with Ciraldo. He has indicated he won’t pursue any opportunities until his commitments with the Panthers end, which will happen within the next fortnight.

The Tigers have put a total recruitment and retention freeze while they make a decision on their coach. They have been linked to Adam Elliott and Tariq Sims but are unable to make genuine plays for the back-rowers because of the ongoing uncertainty surrounding their coach.

Maguire’s position has come under fire because of the Tigers slide under his watch. They finished ninth in his first season in charge before dipping two spots last year. They slumped to 13th on the competition ladder this year.

Despite his lean record, he now sits second to Tim Sheens for the most games coached at the joint-venture.

Sheens was brought in this year and is expected to have an expanded coaching role at the club in 2022.

**If Maguire is sacked, the Tigers will be onto their sixth coach since Sheens was dumped in 2012.**

Quote 1

That's less than 2 years for each coach?
You would have to wonder what reasonable coach would want to come and have his career destroyed?

But, I'm sure someone will.

I find it all a little strange. According to Chammas the review is finished and the board want to sack Maguire but they dont have a replacement? May be able to hire Ciraldo but he wont talk to Tigers for another 3 weeks. I see another 10 years without finals.
 
Back
Top