quote="redemption"]All you need to know bug is that it is fully funded by a development consortium!!!
The original D.A. (that you quote) was predicated on the NSW Govt model - and following the agreed compensation from the Govt for abandoning a project in breach of extant contract(s) - a new model has been developed for repatriation & regeneration of the site that we still fully own!!!
Wasn't ownership of the site was transferred to a private company prior to the DA being lodged, Rozelle Village Pty Ltd, a development company associated with Benny Elias? Council maintains that this was illegal under the Voluntary Planning Agreement entered into between the Balmain Leagues Club Ltd and Leichhardt Council.
Currently, the applicant that lodged the DA, DKO Architecture Pty Ltd, could lodge an appeal with the Land and Environment Court. They have not done so at this stage. There is also a battle raging between Council and Rozelle Village over the return of bank guarantees lodged in relation to the VPA. Rozelle Village is seeking return of the guarantees on the basis that it will not lodge an appeal with the Land and Environment Court.
PS - the DA was not rejected by Leichhardt Council as such, but by a Joint Regional Planning Panel, an independent body which consists of three State appointed and two Council appointed members which determine DAs for 'regionally significant developments'.
All sounds like a bit of a Mexican stand off and that nothing will happen in a hurry.