Tigers stake out wrong money tree

Gary_Bakerloo

New member
Tigers stake out wrong money tree
Date: August 22, 2013 - 10:03AM

There is almost too much to talk about this week: the latest Cronulla developments, the sacking for David Furner and the possibility of Ben Barba being banned from playing against Canterbury as part of any release to Brisbane.

So we'll give all three of them a miss for now. Not much to add on Cronulla's "secret" bank account, the exact circumstances of Furner's removal are still in dispute and no one actually seems to say much on the record about Barba and the Broncos.

Let's instead talk about the mess Wests Tigers have got themselves into.

If you have been keeping an eye on this website, you'll be aware that the joint venture needs an "urgent cash injection" of $1 million and that Western Suburbs will only provide this if they are handed the chairmanship.

Balmain, on the other hand, want an independent board to run the club and are interested in a funding package from the NRL.

Alan Katzmann, a well-know and respected Sydney Roosters fan, writes: “As a Roosters supporter, and NRL fan, I would be appalled to see the NRL provide these funds.

“Adopting the proposal from Balmain, together with their phoney altruism, will mean that the rest of the rugby league world would suffer as a result of Balmain's petulance.

“Funds that could help junior development or keep increases in grand final tickets to a minimum would be spent instead keeping Wests Tigers afloat when they already have alternate funding readily available.”

I couldn't have put it better myself. Balmain is lucky Wests aren't demanding the venture drop the "Tigers" half of their name completely.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/tigers-stake-out-wrong-money-tree-20130822-2scle.html#ixzz2cfSpsR6W
 
@Gary Bakerloo said:
Tigers stake out wrong money tree
Date: August 22, 2013 - 10:03AM

There is almost too much to talk about this week: the latest Cronulla developments, the sacking for David Furner and the possibility of Ben Barba being banned from playing against Canterbury as part of any release to Brisbane.

So we'll give all three of them a miss for now. Not much to add on Cronulla's "secret" bank account, the exact circumstances of Furner's removal are still in dispute and no one actually seems to say much on the record about Barba and the Broncos.

Let's instead talk about the mess Wests Tigers have got themselves into.

If you have been keeping an eye on this website, you'll be aware that the joint venture needs an "urgent cash injection" of $1 million and that Western Suburbs will only provide this if they are handed the chairmanship.

Balmain, on the other hand, want an independent board to run the club and are interested in a funding package from the NRL.

Alan Katzmann, a well-know and respected Sydney Roosters fan, writes: “As a Roosters supporter, and NRL fan, I would be appalled to see the NRL provide these funds.

“Adopting the proposal from Balmain, together with their phoney altruism, will mean that the rest of the rugby league world would suffer as a result of Balmain's petulance.

“Funds that could help junior development or keep increases in grand final tickets to a minimum would be spent instead keeping Wests Tigers afloat when they already have alternate funding readily available.”

I couldn't have put it better myself. Balmain is lucky Wests aren't demanding the venture drop the "Tigers" half of their name completely.

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/tigers-stake-out-wrong-money-tree-20130822-2scle.html#ixzz2cfSpsR6W

It wasn't that long ago balmain were the rich ones and looked after wests! We need a independent board as we are WESTS TIGERS not wests or balmain and have been for 13 yrs.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@Glen McWilliams said:
"a well-known and respected Sydney Roosters fan"

News to me

There's only about a hundred of them, so he'd certainly be well known. Respected though? That's drawing a long bow.
 
CEO of a large business in Sydney. I wonder if Humphreys approached him last year?

Still, sounds like a logical thinker, so perhaps he could be an independent director. The only issue is that he believes the altruistic desire for an independent board is phoney.
 
Why is some morons on here only want an independent board now that Balmain can't cough up. It's simple, I want the Magpies to have their say as long as they pay there way.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
Roosterman or whoever he is has hit the nail on the head. Why would the nrl step in when there are options on the table.
Personally I'd love someone to take control so we could then work on getting the souths or roosters accountants who manage their salary cap…

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
[quote="900large"
Personally I'd love someone to take control so we could then work on getting the souths or roosters accountants who manage their salary cap…

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

“All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”
― George Orwell, Animal Farm
 
@tigermaniac said:
Why is some morons on here only want an independent board now that Balmain can't cough up. It's simple, I want the Magpies to have their say as long as they pay there way.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

If you're going to assign board votes to contributions the NRL would have a controlling interest easily. Now how about debating the topic without the name calling? I'd say most people on this forum have just wanted a side where the common interest of the NRL team is the focus. The Wests Tigers NRL team shouldn't be controlled by Balmain or Wests - the team belongs to the fans not anachronistic bodies.
 
@Yossarian said:
@tigermaniac said:
Why is some morons on here only want an independent board now that Balmain can't cough up. It's simple, I want the Magpies to have their say as long as they pay there way.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

If you're going to assign board votes to contributions the NRL would have a controlling interest easily. Now how about debating the topic without the name calling? I'd say most people on this forum have just wanted a side where the common interest of the NRL team is the focus. The Wests Tigers NRL team shouldn't be controlled by Balmain or Wests - the team belongs to the fans not anachronistic bodies.

No in this instance the team belongs to the WSRLFC and the BDRLFC. The fans are just customers, and have as much ownership of WT as I do of McDonald's when I buy a Big Mac.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
Of course he would be appalled, Roosters are rich as hell and Uncle Nick buys them out of trouble.
 
The rooster fan has a point. We have the money. Its ridiculous to put your hand out when you got the money yourself. Even putting that aside we could get $1m from playing more games at Homebush.
 
Back
Top