@innsaneink said:@Swordy said:I guess only supercoach Bennett could have extracted a win against Souths, especially when we had more players wearing twenty-something on their back than anything 1-13\. Injuries have killed us from game one.
I expect if I ring the WT office tomorrow, then they will confirm a heap of coaching applications from members of this forum who apparently could do better.
From where I sat today, the south fans were dirty on their team because the score should have been much higher. They had all the refs calls, all the 50-50's, the rub of the green all day, and they played a team massacred with injuries and filled with young kids, park footballers and a few regulars. Whilst they never looked like losing, it was only the heart and effort from our guys that stopped a 60 nil whitewash.
I guess with another coach though, all the injured players would have miraculously recovered today and played, and there wouldnt have been any injuries against the cowboys, and Lote wouldnt have a busted arm, and Tedesco would be right, and Moltzen would be fit, and Gareth wouldnt have missed all them games etc etc etc.
So naive…"Oh well at least it was only a 30 point flogging, couldve been 60 eh....phew...thatd be rooolllly embarrasing!"
If you are going to quote someone, at least be correct. I didn't say that, nor did I say I was happy we got beat whether by 2, 10 or 30.
Having a differing opinion doesn't make someone a dope. Unfortunately some in here can't believe others don't blindly agree.
I have no agenda. I have no blind allegiance. What I do have Is a history, if you bothered to look, of agreeing that perhaps another coach such as Anderson might just be what we need. What I won't do is lay total blame on Sheens when some things, like significant injuries are beyond his control.
\
\
\
_Posted using RoarFEED 2012_