earl
Well-known member
It was a dominant round 1 and then he still out wrestled him in the last 2 rounds. I reckon he won easily.How did Khamzat win easily? He wanted no part of the standup and just laid on him. I had it 2-1 Usman.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It was a dominant round 1 and then he still out wrestled him in the last 2 rounds. I reckon he won easily.How did Khamzat win easily? He wanted no part of the standup and just laid on him. I had it 2-1 Usman.
Disagree I think that's overstating his grappling exchanges. He did nothing but lay on him. Usman's effective striking won him round's 2 & 3 imo. If you think Khamzat won round 3 we were watching a different fight. Round 2 was the close one.It was a dominant round 1 and then he still out wrestled him in the last 2 rounds. I reckon he won easily.
Nope. That’s fighting.Does this hurt Volk's legacy? He shouldn't have taken the fight on short notice but it's easy to say in hindsight.
PEDs are in every sport mate. In Lance Armstrongs era in cycling they were all on EPO.Nope. That’s fighting.
On any given day something can get through and knock you out of the contest.
The only guarantees in UFC type competitions are for those using drugs.
PEDs are in every sport mate. In Lance Armstrongs era in cycling they were all on EPO.
Let's run it back and make it 5 rounds.
That doesn’t make it right.PEDs are in every sport mate. In Lance Armstrongs era in cycling they were all on EPO.
The fights were interesting back then.I watched UFC 13 on Youtube last night.
Those were the best days when everyone was so crap at it. Blokes wearing karate pyjamas and shoes fighting dudes in Speedos.
A roid raging Vitor Belfort smashed Tank Abbott and Tito Ortiz was choked out by some bloke who was never heard of again.
At first I thought you were referring to yourself but I take it you mean the fighters.Life changer