Tucker
Well-known member
What a lovely thing to hope for.Couldn’t give a shit about politics but lowkey hoping Trump loses just to see the fallout it would cause. I predict 1. Definite riots in the streets 2. Threats for a civil war.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What a lovely thing to hope for.Couldn’t give a shit about politics but lowkey hoping Trump loses just to see the fallout it would cause. I predict 1. Definite riots in the streets 2. Threats for a civil war.
Unless its a Trump landslide, we wont know the results for ages Id say.Bro, give it until tonight or at least till polls come in lol
Except for the guy behind him there to guide him. And like I said, if its good enough for him, he’s fair game.Still attacking the man's physicallity.....That garbage truck troll was well recieved and for an old bloke, he got up there just fine.
It's the age of disinformation. Gunther Eagleman aka David Freeman is a notorious fabulist. He has the credibility of Baghdad Bob.I love how posts like this aren’t subtle in how full of 💩they are. There are ways you can make these sorts of claims half believable. This however is not one of them
View attachment 17128
Tiresome.Does anyone listen to sKamala.
She doesn't know how to answer any questions with substance.
Hopes aspiration Opportunity economy blah blah
honestly, is she a legitimate leader or just a DEI hire???
Kamala definitely feels like Value at $2.30 but probably not enough just yet 😂Putting partisanship to one side, for any punters, the candidates' odds tend to oscillate wildly on election day as the votes filter in. Last election, Biden drifted out to $3.50 and Trump to $7 in the 2016 election. I won on both, but this time I don't have the heart to make a bet.
Are you watching twitter?I love how posts like this aren’t subtle in how full of 💩they are. There are ways you can make these sorts of claims half believable. This however is not one of them
View attachment 17128
It’s funny I saw him interviewed the other day. First time I ever saw him. Total dweeb with a high pitched voice.It's the age of disinformation. Gunther Eagleman aka David Freeman is a notorious fabulist. He has the credibility of Baghdad Bob.
It will be fun in a few hours. One side is gonna be coping hard.Are you watching twitter?
Id stay well away from that lol....
You only have to look at Obama to see your point has merit.don't ever mistake conflating public speaking ability with governing ability. Some of the best speakers aren't great leaders
Thats why I will go nowhere near it. Only the most toxic shitheads from both sides will be on there today.It will be fun in a few hours. One side is gonna be coping hard.
LOL its funny a bloke in his 30's/40's having a dig at a fella near 80 climbing into a truck.Except for the guy behind him there to guide him. And like I said, if its good enough for him, he’s fair game.
Kamala definitely feels like Value at $2.30 but probably not enough just yet 😂
The problem isn’t so much that he struggled, it’s another example of how he’s the first to mock others for doing things he can’t even do himself.LOL its funny a bloke in his 30's/40's having a dig at a fella near 80 climbing into a truck.
How do you think Joe would have gone? LOL What about Kamarla? He did alright.
Ha that's a good one - "embellished for effect to bolster your argument". I think that almost entirely meets the definition of how an internet forum works.Mate. Whist I appreciate the time and effort to write this and largely agree with some of your points here, as you said, you've embellished for effect to help bolster your argument.
Unless you're going to do the same for the Democrats, it's an exercise in futility.
For example, in response to point 3 (in which you've made a raft of assumptions) under the Dems, the Ukraine War and Israel/Pal war have escalated to ridiculous proportions. There has been widespread import and supply-chain implications for that not only here, but across the globe. This has hit inflation and cost of living back pockets left, right and centre. They have been terrible/impotent at mitigating those. Trump has a track record, in his first term, of limiting large, overseas conflict. He kept Putin, Netanyahu and Kim at bay.
That is a fact.
So, whilst I agree that there COULD be implications for a new tariff approach with China specifically, remember, that the trickle down percentage trade shifts are unknown, meaning, China may shift its trade policy to protect itself, possibly ramping up Australian exports or imports in response to a more expensive trade process with the US.
Additionally, Australia operates in a free trade agreement with the US and there have been ZERO signs or indications that Trump intends or has suggested changing that. In fact, as one of the US's staunchest allies, it wouldn't make sense to do so.
Furthermore, tariff changes in the US are used, or are proposed to be used for a number of reasons, including with Mexico to address immigration, with China/NK, etc to impose strategic sanctions, or, namely, as he has said, to bolster the local economy, which, as the US is an important trade partner with Australia, would improve or increase these metrics.
There are a lot of balls in the air with this one. But it is a fool's errand to make too many down-the-road assumptions, particularly as it pertains to topics as complex as this.
Once again, I respect your opinion and the time taken to respond in such a detailed manner.