If you were to break down the stats from last night, ET was actually the 4th most effective metre eater per carry, with 9.14m/carry.
Liddle the most effective at 11.75, then Suli at 10.66, Grant at 10.625….
As I said earlier, I wouldnt be putting too much stock into blaming ET for our go forward, when Edwards made 6.2m/carry, and Lovett 5.8m/carry.
Woods is in the same class as Gallen, being a mostly ineffective ball hog who gain plaudits for a high work rate though at 7.72m/carry is in the lower half of the entire team. That and I am pretty sure he has the slowest ptb stats in the comp.
So to say we are carrying ET, when he was not far off our most efficient runner with ball in hand and definitely our top defensive player is an oxymoron.
There is an old saying "ÿou dont weaken one position to strengthen another". We dont have to pigs to trot out a FG quality prop rotation, neverlone a spare with a massive motor to play Lock. So that means our reality is there is no moving him out to the 2nd row to strengthen it which in turn would make us downgrade at lock.
2nd row is where we are really coming up short. There is no two ways about it.