littletiger
New member
@Paris Cobbs said:@Tiger In The Gong said:In hindsight Todd Payten should have been given the job.
He would have been the better match for this crop of players. That said Taylor can get results too.
I wasn't going to bring it up, but I always thought that Toddy was the man for the job.
I don't see the value in these fascist psycho tantrum-throwing coaches. Bellamy had success, but with a team worth double the salary cap. Talk about a playmaker's options - Smith and Cronk had Ingilis, Slater at his peak, Folau, Hoffman. Brooks has Tedesco. At the moment, JT is holding himself in check and speaking calmly. See what happens if our losing streak continues.
I'm as glad as anyone that our defense was good against the Cowboys, but the word JT left out was 'win', and to do that you have to score some points, a run of 0-0 draws won't get us into the playoffs!
To put things in perspective, we played the Cowboys without Farah and Woods, and if Naiquama had grounded the ball over the line instead of fumbling it, we probably would have won, and if we'd won we would be calling JT a genius. So let's hope it works v the Titans.
Regarding comments on payton people are forgetting there a second issue that coaches have to deal with apart from coaching players form.
Theres the whole management side of bring a coach too. Like getting the salary cap in order like the roosters so your an ongoing successful club.. coaches like payton would have taken wt down the same path it was already on … I.e recruit more players even tho cap is a mess to save their asses instead of a rebuilding path that models those successful clubs like Taylor has done.
I agree it remains to be seen if Taylor can coach a decent group of players like McGregor is doing now at st George... But it's imperative we fix our operations up first which Taylor is definitely doing.