Wests tigers 2011

  • Thread starter Thread starter hater
  • Start date Start date
@happy tiger said:
yeap losing your team is painful I was a **Brisbane Wests** supporter and to see them die after winning 4 premierships in 16 years was dissappointing and still remember us getting thrown out in 83 Wests magpies was as devastating

Did they wear the similar red n green souths jumper???

Remember as a kid it always confused me, was a big Wests Magpies fan here in sydney, but Brisbane Souths wore the white maggie strip with black V….Easts were the Tigers :crazy - couldnt grasp it as a kid, thought it all very odd
 
@innsaneink said:
@happy tiger said:
yeap losing your team is painful I was a **Brisbane Wests** supporter and to see them die after winning 4 premierships in 16 years was dissappointing and still remember us getting thrown out in 83 Wests magpies was as devastating

Did they wear the similar red n green souths jumper???

Remember as a kid it always confused me, was a big Wests Magpies fan here in sydney, but Brisbane Souths wore the white maggie strip with black V….Easts were the Tigers :crazy - couldnt grasp it as a kid, thought it all very odd

red and black the panthers lots of ex players went to Sydney Fatty, Tony Currie , Greg Oliphant Adrian Lam John Ribot to name but a few Red and Green were \are Wynnum Manly the were the glamours of the 80's Lewis , Miles Dowling Colin Scott French brothers Des Morris Talking of Fatty that try he scored when he went 80 metres saw it No one mentions Lewis would of nailed him from scrum base if he hadn't got hurt
 
@tigh said:
@Snodgrass said:
@tigh said:
What a classic. There is no Balmain or Western Suburbs in the NRL today. If you have a problem with that - rack off and go follow another code or comp. Leave the rest of us to follow our beloved Wests Tigers.

FTR - I was born in a room above a shop in Darling St Rozelle - 50m from the Balmain Leagies. I grew up in Rozelle. Up until 1999 I bled back and gold. Now I bleed black white and gold. My 2, 4, 6 and 8 yr olds know nothing of Balmain or Wests. I take them to scream for the Westst Tigers. They don't care if we play at SFS, Cambo or Leichardt - they scream for the wests tigers. in 10 yrs time, anyone who mentions the name Balmain or Wetsern Suburbs will be seen as dinosours - if they aren't already. Anyone who tries to argue for either Balmain or Wests will be (as they already are) seen as the losers they are.

Get a life loser! ANd anyone giving any sort of credence to anything this loser has said - you can rack off too. Support the Wests TIgers - or go follow net ball (not that there's anything wrong with that)

******kicks over bin as he leaves the room to get out the boxing gloves and take out his frustration on the bag*******

Heritage is relevant - or do you also scream at the old blokes clogging up our TV screens every ANZAC day.
Your argument is kinda Orwellian - "We are the Wests Tigers and we have always been the Wests Tigers". - well that aint true. And people have a right to voice concerns/gripes etc without all this aggro BS.
\
\
:sign:

Wow - that is the best verballing I've been subjected to for a long time - well done. You should be in politics, media or the courts. And my argument being 'kind Orwellian'…..... :roll

Not sure what Anzac Day has to do with anything here champ? I really fail to see the similarities in any sense -but I'll play along - you see, Australian Diggers and those that cheer for them do not post hate filled posts on forums declaring the right of another country to glorify their war heroes. They don't try to discredit or denigrate the 'other ' side - unlike old mate here. I don't see NZ soldiers or their families and frineds trying to denigrate the Australian soldiers with whom they fought. And taking it even further, by celebrating the Anzac tradition - your argument seems to suggest that by cheering our ANZACS we are somehow making our Australian heratage irrelvant?

And please highlight where I said heritage wasn't relavent champ? It was the brainchild declaring the Balmain heritage is dead and buried - NOT I. I was simply making that point that if old mate wants to carry on with that type of 'us and them' crap, go to the magpies forum and have a blast. This is a Wests Tigers forum that has a section for the Magpies and Balmin sides.

And I certainly didn't say 'we re the wests togers and have always been the wests tigers' so please keep me out of your misguided self serving verballing.

Any person who tries to denigrate either side of the Merger for their own musguided self serving sop boxing - as far as I'm concerned - can rack off and go and do it somewhere else. Leave the rest of us Wests TIgers fans alone to enjoy eachothers company, and discuss our thoughts views and opinions on the Wests Tigers in a constructive , enjoyable forum environment.

well said Tigh
 
wests-tigers are our team.
we follow them because, we love them and would not follow any other team.
.
if you want to pay out on wests-tigers then be prepared to feel the anger of loyal/passionate supporters.
 
@tigh said:
Any person who tries to denigrate either side of the Merger for their own musguided self serving sop boxing - as far as I'm concerned - can rack off and go and do it somewhere else. Leave the rest of us Wests TIgers fans alone to enjoy eachothers company, and discuss our thoughts views and opinions on the Wests Tigers in a constructive , enjoyable forum environment.

Couldn't agree more. Brilliantly written!!
 
i wonder if this thread inspired a dinosaur named 'kev' to call talkin sport last night.

going on about how we would have 20000 members if Balmain didn't dominate and rule the merger or at least give that perception. Thats because there are thousands like him that will never support weststigers as long as this is the perception.

how cambo should have at least 6 games as the people are desperate for more footy & can't get enough. even though he won't go to the current games out there as that would be supporting weststigers.

how weststigers will be to blame when afl takes over the west.

it was all quite funny & sad at the same time.

and i do mean genuinely sad as here is a bloke who obviously loves his footy but can't let the past go & is missing out on all the good things the weststigers have done & are doing.
 
Sad really.
So much vitriol.
See the balance suits you guys (at the moment) so it's a non issue.
But not all the traditional supporters are happy and it really doesn't take a hell of a lot of effort to consider the tin tacks calmly.
Show a bit of respect and voice your opinions without calling people "losers" and telling people who have the gall to disagree with you to "rack off".
Save that shit for Manly supporters !
 
@underdog said:
The WESTS TIGERS are always called that. WESTS tigers. they will always be given a fair go interms of the merger. Its the first word that is said in any official communication when the team gets mentioned.
:sign: :sign: :sign:

Could someone remind Ben Fordham (sports reporter) for channel 9 and 2GB of this fact please?? After 11 Yrs he still says Balmain, talking about time machines….
 
@kill'em'all tigers said:
i wonder if this thread inspired a dinosaur named 'kev' to call talkin sport last night.

going on about how we would have 20000 members if Balmain didn't dominate and rule the merger or at least give that perception. Thats because there are thousands like him that will never support weststigers as long as this is the perception.

how cambo should have at least 6 games as the people are desperate for more footy & can't get enough. even though he won't go to the current games out there as that would be supporting weststigers.

how weststigers will be to blame when afl takes over the west.

it was all quite funny & sad at the same time.

and i do mean genuinely sad as here is a bloke who obviously loves his footy but can't let the past go & is missing out on all the good things the weststigers have done & are doing.

Reminds me of some Souths supporters I know would never accept a merger…...
 
Hater writes some sense here.

What I ask for is a 50/50 share in all that's Wests Tigers. Fairness on all operations and perceptions including NSW Cup allocations.

Wests Tigers are the future. The south west is the future.
 
@Balmain Bug said:
Hater writes some sense here.

What I ask for is a 50/50 share in all that's Wests Tigers. Fairness on all operations and perceptions including NSW Cup allocations.

Wests Tigers are the future. The south west is the future.

And you believe you're the one to suggests who writes "sense"???????

Fair Diinkum!!!!!

Maybe his own forum name (just like yours Bug) gives him away as a stirrer - naysayer - troll - moaner - whiner & completely unobjective!!!
 
@Snodgrass said:
Sad really.
So much vitriol.
See the balance suits you guys (at the moment) so it's a non issue.
But not all the traditional supporters are happy and it really doesn't take a hell of a lot of effort to consider the tin tacks calmly.
Show a bit of respect and voice your opinions without calling people "losers" and telling people who have the gall to disagree with you to "rack off".
Save that s*** for Manly supporters !

I used the term 'rack off' to be nice - so as not to offend! Perhaps I should have said what I was really thinking!

I'm a little upset you didn't address my response following your reference to our diggers and our heritage - or are you backing away from your comments (read - verballing) on that now? Perhaps I made some sense? C'mon Snod, I love a good discussion following an outright verbal.

The fact that a merger going back 12 years still results in some original Wests or Balmain supporters not being happy is (whilst somewhat understandable) of no concern to me at all. There are plenty of forums for them to vent their deep seeded anger and frustration - but leave us Wests Tigers supporters to get on with supporting our team in the NRL. And you wouldn;t believe it (read the sarcasm) some of us actually have the gaul to cheer for the Wests and Balmain lower grades>>>>>>>>SHOCK HORROR! Fair dinkum, if some people on here had their way we would still be travelling by horse and cart and listening to the footy on a crackling old transistor radio!

Now, unless you're going to engage in some good old fashion discussion about your earlier verballing of me, then go away - I have to focus on bleeding some more black gold and white on the hill tomorrow night….......while (I'm guessing) Hater probably sits at home crying in his KB watching re-runs of Kingswood COuntry on his 28cm black and white........as you can see I have no sympathy for a rebel rousing _Hater![/i\
\
This is me, my Mrs and our 4 kids (aged 2-8) on the hill tomorrow night.......... :sign: :sign: :sign: :sign: :sign: :sign:\
\
This is Hater watching Kingswood Country on his 28cm B&W........... :bawling_
 
I will have my trusty Wests transistor radio with me Tigh…is that OK,,?
 
@Geo. said:
I will have my trusty Wests transistor radio with me Tigh…is that OK,,?

Enjoy Geo - but do yourself a favour - get some footy ears. You can listen to the ref in one ear, and the commentary in the other…....you'll love it.
 
@tigh said:
_I'm a little upset you didn't address my response following your reference to our diggers and our heritage - or are you backing away from your comments (read - verballing) on that now? Perhaps I made some sense? C'mon Snod, I love a good discussion following an outright verbal_.

The ANZAC analogy was a response to your apparent dismissal of anything that has gone before - you know where you said …

_"in 10 yrs time, anyone who mentions the name Balmain or Wetsern Suburbs will be seen as dinosours - if they aren't already. Anyone who tries to argue for either Balmain or Wests will be (as they already are) seen as the losers they are."_

You do realize we still play at Leichhardt for historical, not emotion free, 'rational' reasons,
and we still have seperate junior rep squadsand NSW Cup teams for historical reasons (ie to keep Wests & Balmain alive) ... I mean if you have no concern whatsoever for the heritage of this club then let's kill em both off.

Would this be like knocking the monkey off our backs or would it create a RLFC without a soul ???
Guess time would tell.

and Tighe - this is a Wests Tigers forum - what better place to discuss matters pertaining to the Wests Tigers ... ???
\
\
:supporter:
 
@Snodgrass said:
[quote="tigh
_I'm a little upset you didn't address my response following your reference to our diggers and our heritage - or are you backing away from your comments (read - verballing) on that now? Perhaps I made some sense? C'mon Snod, I love a good discussion following an outright verbal_.

The ANZAC analogy was a response to your apparent dismissal of anything that has gone before - you know where you said …

_"in 10 yrs time, anyone who mentions the name Balmain or Wetsern Suburbs will be seen as dinosours - if they aren't already. Anyone who tries to argue for either Balmain or Wests will be (as they already are) seen as the losers they are."_

You do realize we still play at Leichhardt for historical, not emotion free, 'rational' reasons,
and we still have seperate junior rep squadsand NSW Cup teams for historical reasons (ie to keep Wests & Balmain alive) ... I mean if you have no concern whatsoever for the heritage of this club then let's kill em both off.

Would this be like knocking the monkey off our backs or would it create a RLFC without a soul ???
Guess time would tell.

and Tighe - this is a Wests Tigers forum - what better place to discuss matters pertaining to the Wests Tigers ... ???
\
\
\
\
They should have 1 nsw cup team CALLED WESTS TIGERS and sheens had said that from the start and lamb before him.

Tigh dont worry you wernt the ning nong that started this thread.
 
Snod - like I said, I am one of the (apparently) strange fans that actually cheers for the Wests and Balmain premier league and junior sides ********screams, shock, horror - please tell me there are not fans who actually cheers for Balmain and Wetst Junior sides….........OMFG************ Snod, I didn't realise we had to hate eachother ..........note to self, as a born and bred Balmain tragic, hate everything Wests because Hater and Snod said that everything pre 1999 is the way it should be, and I must hate everything pre 1999 that is not Balmain - even the team we merged with because anything less betrays our history!

The fact that you imply we only play at Leichhardt for irrational emotional reasons shows your absolute lack of objectivity, and simply goes to illustrate that anything further you say in this debate should be taken with a grain of salt.

The reason we play at Leichhardt old mate is because it is one of our home grounds - if you want to bring a balmin/Wests argument into that - I feel sorry for you. The reason we play at Leichhardt (NB spelling of Leichhardt) is no more for histrical reasons that the reason we play at Cambo, or Manly play at Brookvale, or Penrith play at Penrith, or Cronulla play at Cronulla - IT'S (one of) OUR HOME GROUNDS!!!!!!!! We have a few (too many ) home grounds, just like the Dragqueens merger. It's life, build a bridge and get over with it. For you to make such statement about Leichhardt (implying the only reason we play there is for emotional and irrational reasons) and omitt Campbelltown in any similar assessment shows your objectivity and lack of ability to be reasonable in this discussion. Are you and Hater the same person?

As for your ANZAC argument (analogy) - it simply doesn't stack up. By your way of thinking, cheering the ANZAC's automatically belies our roots (either Wests or Balmain). Ridiculous notion that would only ever be argued by the cave dwellers that continue to pursue the us v them (read Balmain/Wetst v Wests/Balmain) agenda. Take the agenda elsewhere - WE NOW SUPPORT THE WESTS TIGERS IN THE NRL.

I can't recall seeing you or Hater on the hill last night - all my family and I saw were Wests TIgers supporters - on a dreary rainy Saturday night against a non-Sydney team - in their thouands?
 
Back
Top