Part 5
Player Evaluation: Terrell May – Suitability as a Lock (13)
Before diving into an assessment of Terrell May as a 13 we should look at how Wests Tigers play so that we can determine if he is a “fit”.
The 2026 spine (post recovery) projects as:
- 7. Jarome Luai – a creative, tempo-based half who thrives off quick play-the-balls and broken defensive lines.
- 6. Latu Fainu – a young organiser with strong fundamentals but who requires space and protection to manage sets.
- 9. Api Koroisau – a deception-based dummy-half who manipulates ruck speed and short-side numbers.
- 1. Jahream Bula – developing as a backfield support runner rather than a structural playmaker.
Notes: Fainu and Luai’s numbering could be reversed with no change on the outcome. AD is a potential 7 candidate if he does not transition to 13. If we don’t have a ball playing 13 this will affect the way we execute the game plan.
The collective challenge:
This spine functions best when the middle wins the ruck early, generating speed and width before defensive lines reset.
West’s Tigers halves
do not dominate through organisation — they thrive when they
react to momentum.
Therefore; the 13’s role must
create time and space for Luai and Fainu, not just through passing, but by
commanding the middle corridor.
What “Time and Space” Means in Practice
“Creating time and space” for halves comes from three interlinked middle-forward dynamics:
- Ruck Speed – quick play-the-balls collapse defensive lines inward, giving halves a 3v3 or 3v2 edge picture.
- Decoy Depth and Line Integrity – tight middle lines and crafty 9’s hold A/B defenders, preventing early edge shifts.
- Second-Phase and Offload Play – triggers “unscripted” shape opportunities for reactive halves like Luai.
A lock who can generate these three elements becomes
the functional link that buys the spine room to operate.
Given that Terrell May does not currently possess a passing game his role at 13 would be to generate room by other means.
Background & Context
- Current position: Middle forward / prop
- Age: 26 (born April 1999)
- Height/Weight: 183 cm, 108 kg
- 2025 Season: 24 games | ~166 run metres p/g | 1,328 post-contact metres | 1,023 tackles @ 97% efficiency | 66 offloads
- Note: 2025 Kelly-Barnes Medallist (Wests Tigers Player of the Year) as a prop.
In essence, May was our engine room in 2025 — a relentless metre-eater and defensive anchor. The evaluation question is:
Can a player built on volume evolve into a modern 13 — or does his optimal value lie in his current position?
The modern 13 is not a one-size role — teams tailor the position to complement spine structure.
If we map May across the contemporary lock continuum the following is derived.
Ball-Playing Lock
Benchmark Skills:
- Ability to pass both sides short/long before the line.
- Reads defensive shapes, triggers shifts with timing.
- Communicates as secondary organiser behind halves.
- Possesses footwork for line engagement and quick play-the-balls.
Terrell May’s Fit:
- Passing range: Limited to short, flat passes; offloads in contact more instinctive than structured.
- Decision-making: Operates as a carrier, not a first-receiver link. Rarely manipulates defensive lines to create space.
- Mobility: Good for a prop but not elite lateral mover like Cam Murray.
- Communication: Developing; not a play maker.
Assessed Fit:
🔸 Low suitability (3/10).
He can
support a ball-playing system through second-phase play but cannot
run it.
To evolve into this style, he’d need significant offseason work in:
- Core passing mechanics (both sides),
- Game-management drills (linking with 6/7/9),
- Line-speed reads in both attack and defence.
Without those, he remains a carrier rather than a distributor.
Hybrid Runner/Link Lock
Benchmark Skills:
- High-workrate middle forward who complements halves.
- Good short-pass options at the line; can swing to either side in attacking sets.
- Has endurance to play 60-70 minutes while maintaining ruck speed
Terrell May’s Fit:
- Workrate: Excellent — plays long minutes with minimal drop-off.
- Passing: Simple but effective short hands.
- Endurance: Slightly below true lock standard but trending upward.
- Footwork: Compact, heavy set; effective through contact, not around it.
Assessed Fit:
🔸 Moderate suitability (5/10).
If the we were to opt for this approach, May could manage with targeted skill refinement.
He’d provide an outlet for Luai and Fainu in tight, maintain ruck tempo, and offer offloads as connective tissue in possession sets.
However, his lack of width passing limits attacking variation from middle third.
Traditional Lock
Benchmark Skills:
- Heavy contact, dominant collisions, sets physical tone.
- Drives line speed defensively, wins post-contact metres offensively.
- Offloads to generate chaos and second phase.
- Operates as an on-field tone-setter rather than organiser.
Terrell May’s Fit:
- Physical dominance: Elite tier — top 5 in post-contact metres among forwards.
- Tackling technique: High efficiency (97%), consistent marker work.
- Offload creation: 66 in 2025 (1st among forwards).
- Ruck tempo: Does not win the ruck consistently and does not have a quick play the ball.
Assessed Fit:
🔸 Moderate suitability (6/10).
May could become a traditional lock; however, requires significant work on his ability to generate ruck speed through quick play the balls. He lacks the “alpha” drive; he a workhorse not a pack leader.
With a complimentary power-forward identity, May’s style could anchor the middle with defensive ruck dominance and second-phase unpredictability.
Tactical Implications for Wests Tigers 2026
If we aim to
build a ruck-control game and play “through” the middle to enable Luai’s short-side tempo, May could be zfoundational 13. To do so we need to build middle tempo by dominating the ruck with ball in hand. We have not been able to achieve this consistently over the last three years.
If we intend create
tempo through ball movement, Adam Doueihi or a play-link lock is preferable.
May’s durability is already elite — the leap to a complete lock depends on significantly expanding his
horizontal game (passing, voice, mobility) or having him play a traditional lock role as part of a power funnel.
Note: A
“forward funnel” model is where a dominant middle compresses the defence, freeing Luai to exploit width. This could work; however, it would be heavily reliant on the output of Royce and Bunty to allow second phase play to be executed off the back of the go forward.
Conclusion
Terrell May’s 2025 form positions him as an elite middle forward. His skill set, without significant development, does
not align with the emerging
ball-playing lock type the current Wests Tigers game plan requires. For Wests Tigers, Terrell’s suitability depends on changing the club's direction.
Recommendation
The transition of Terrell May to 13 is
not recommended; it would require us to change direction in our game play – from playing eyes up footy based on momentum to playing a power forward game. This is a completely different pack requirement/game plan to what has been developed over the last three years.