@matty119 said:I read this article this morning, but thought it was very interesting that nobody had posted this before. On the back page of the Tele it says:
"Sheens would not divulge which elements he was talking about, but it is known the **Western Suburbs side of the joint venture** did not want to retain Marshall as he eyed rugby deals in Europe and Japan"
Now this raises massive concerns about this side of the joint venture, particularly since it was reported that they were the reason that Noyce left, and were the side which pushed for Sheens, the Australian coach, to be punted this year as well whilst Longmuir was in charge. I think that in the end it was then who supported Longmuir and the others who thought he should be gone, and the result is potentially the best CEO we have had.
Is this a sign of the lacking business acumen mentioned earlier where one side wanted the biggest star, both on and off the field, out of the culb?
Mate why shouldn't Sheens be put under the pump. 1 finals appearance in 7 years.
And until he moved back into the number 6 jersey, Benji was losing us games. Games that in the end, cost us a finals birth.
Longmuir wanted the coach to have accountability. Something Western Suburbs supported. Those in the Wests Tigers having a 'cooshy' ride didn't want their junket spoiled.