Wests Tigers need quick $1m to survive

innsaneink

Well-known member
Wests Tigers need an urgent cash injection of $1 million to survive - something powerful stakeholder Wests Ashfield will only provide in exchange for control of the joint venture's board.

Fairfax Media can reveal the embattled club has come to the most critical crossroads of its turbulent history, with the Magpies side of the partnership no longer prepared to provide funding without greater control.

While they steadfastly want to remain in partnership with cash-strapped partners Balmain, Wests have demanded an extra director on a reduced nine or seven-man board and the chairmanship for the next three years in exchange for new funding to remain solvent.

Wests Tigers chairman Mike Bailey - who is also chairman of Wests - said on Monday night: ''I don't know what Balmain's view is today, but we live in hope that good sense will prevail and the need will be recognised for the sort of money we're contributing and that the club can flourish. I would have to say, when you look back over this joint venture, there have been times when we have reached a similar situation. The difference this time is that we do have a financial problem that needs to be addressed. We have one side, potentially, to address that. The [ARL Commission] understands the situation and they are keen for us to address it. From our point of view, we need to bring this to a head and march on with a more secure financial base.''
Advertisement

Asked when Wests wanted an answer from Balmain, Bailey said: ''We've asked for Balmain to address this by the end of the week. We want to continue, as we always have, in partnership with Balmain despite the problems we have. We have tried to do that in the past. We do get frustrated that we can't address the most pressing problem - the need for finance.''

It is also understood the ARLC recently commissioned an independent report on the governance of the club, which foreshadowed independent directors.

A bemused Balmain chairman Nick Di Girolamo, who is deputy chairman of the joint venture, said his side of the partnership wanted the NRL model pursued.

''The Wests Tigers have been in constant dialogue with [NRL chief executive] Dave Smith in relation to financial stability and best corporate governance practices,'' he said. ''This is not about a short-term quick fix for the Wests Tigers. This is about the longevity of the club. It's about ensuring that we have the best corporate governance in place, which would include the injection of independent directors to cover the breadth of expertise required on club boards to ensure the future viability of the club.

''I say that with no disrespect to the current directors of the Wests Tigers. However, it is quite clear from our discussions with the NRL that we need reform. From a Balmain Tigers perspective, we accept this view.''

Wests are prepared to allow even control again once Balmain becomes stronger financially.

But for now, Wests have asked for the governance change in the wake of growing frustration over Balmain's inability to meet its financial obligations since the closure of Balmain Leagues Club prevented the Tigers from providing investment funds to the club.

Wests Ashfield, which provides the Magpies' funding, has already provided more than $500,000 in short-term loans to the NRL club.

Balmain were unable to make immediate contributions when funds were needed in July last year, with Wests then starting negotiations to alleviate the situation, as allowed under the agreement between the two foundation clubs.

In December, when the required funding had not been received, Wests initiated the change in the club's shareholding to more accurately reflect the financial viability of the two groups, effectively enabling Wests to contribute financial support alone. Balmain rejected this move, along with other short-term changes, without explanation.

Bailey denied the club was on the verge of insolvency.

''I don't think it's a matter of insolvency as a matter of addressing some of the ongoing financial problems going into the future,'' Bailey said. ''Also, that money is to support the junior leagues of both areas. We regard the most important aspect of our business as overcoming financial shortcomings.

''That's why we are trying to move in the way we are.''

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/wests-tigers-need-quick-1m-to-survive-20130819-2s7c3.html#ixzz2cRiyPZue
 
This seems like a cheap ploy from the Wests side to get control of the board. The NRL won't let Wests Tigers fold and the Magpies while seeming blackmailing Balmain since they have the funds, the Magpies won't do anything to upset the balance and force the lose of their NRL license.

–-

Obviously it's a smart decision for Wests to provide funds to ensure the club remains afloat without support from the NRL. Of course the pay off his the Wests club get an extra seat on the board.

Still have 14 years, I can't believe we are fighting about this.
 
With money comes power ….that's life ,put up or shut up , it looks as though the Wests side are actually keeping the Weststigers viable with short term loans to KEEP Balmain in the game.
 
@azsportza said:
This seems like a cheap ploy from the Wests side to get control of the board. The NRL won't let Wests Tigers fold and the Magpies while seeming blackmailing Balmain since they have the funds, the Magpies won't do anything to upset the balance and force the lose of their NRL license.

What a dumbass grubby thing to say. Take your blunders off fool

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
How long can balmain (and consequently WT) sustain a $11m debt and black hole?

Of course Ashfield want to have more say if they are pouring millions into WT.

WT wont be reverting back to Magpies so don't stress Balmain diehards…

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
Hang on guys lets step back before we start all the Wests vs Balmain rubbish.

First problem- WHY IS THIS IN THE PRESS! It is completely inappropriate and very damaging to Wests Tigers to air their dirty laundry in the press.

Our Weather man must miss being in the press. So incredibly unprofessional. If anyone spoke publically about why happened on a corporate board it would not be accepted.

I say, don't take the bait. Don't discuss the money, dont discuss anything other than root cause of our issues - terrible governance structures.

We need an independent board
We need the NRL involved
We don't want to become a club with a terrible board culture with lots of money (parra)
Look how good Mayer is - we could have 5 of him on the board

I won't stand for this! As a member who sat in the cold watching last night, screaming my lungs out trying to support our struggling team, I want an independent board. I want it now. It's more than the money. This being in the press shows the real problem!

We are not fools. Bailey turn your mic off!!
 
A WT restructure may be ideal but who is then going to pour money into WT?

NRL certainly wont long term..

Why is everyone so paradnoid about Ashfield ownership? having a wealthy leagues club as majority owner certainly is not a bad thing for WT.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@azsportza said:
This seems like a cheap ploy from the Wests side to get control of the board. The NRL won't let Wests Tigers fold and the Magpies while seeming blackmailing Balmain since they have the funds, the Magpies won't do anything to upset the balance and force the lose of their NRL license.

Simple, pay or die. This is how the joint venture came into existence, both teams were struggling. Now one side is financially gone. Find the money or get out of the way. WT must roll on. Reality.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
Get rid of these fools now

Here they are being questioned about money needed to help the WESTS TIGERS FFS and they bring the old Wests V Balmain chestnut up again

Just hire 7 people who have the best interests of the WESTS TIGERS at heart
 
@happy tiger said:
Get rid of these fools now

Here they are being questioned about money needed to help the WESTS TIGERS FFS and they bring the old Wests V Balmain chestnut up again

Just hire 7 people who have the best interests of the WESTS TIGERS at heart

WT is a company.. This is business… Are those 7 people going to be aligned to the owners? Are they going to contribute millions to WT?

Wests vs Balmain crap is a identity matter.. This is a business/company ownership isssue

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@wtfl1981 said:
@happy tiger said:
Get rid of these fools now

Here they are being questioned about money needed to help the WESTS TIGERS FFS and they bring the old Wests V Balmain chestnut up again

Just hire 7 people who have the best interests of the WESTS TIGERS at heart

WT is a company.. This is business… Are those 7 people going to be aligned to the owners? Are they going to contribute millions to WT?

Wests vs Balmain crap is a identity matter.. This is a business/company ownership isssue

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

No the 7 people are going to give unbiased ,good governance to the Tigers without leaking crap to the media whenever they don't get their way
 
@Mccarry said:
Hang on guys lets step back before we start all the Wests vs Balmain rubbish.

First problem- WHY IS THIS IN THE PRESS! It is completely inappropriate and very damaging to Wests Tigers to air their dirty laundry in the press.

Our Weather man must miss being in the press. So incredibly unprofessional. If anyone spoke publically about why happened on a corporate board it would not be accepted.

I say, don't take the bait. Don't discuss the money, dont discuss anything other than root cause of our issues - terrible governance structures.

We need an independent board
We need the NRL involved
We don't want to become a club with a terrible board culture with lots of money (parra)
Look how good Mayer is - we could have 5 of him on the board

I won't stand for this! As a member who sat in the cold watching last night, screaming my lungs out trying to support our struggling team, I want an independent board. I want it now. It's more than the money. This being in the press shows the real problem!

We are not fools. Bailey turn your mic off!!

Yes,I cant believe this is being played out to the press….amateur hour rolls on.
 
Let's not get side tracked. The board needs a face lift, but Balmain need funds. Can both these issues be answered, I don't think so. Money can and will bring changes, you just need it.

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@happy tiger said:
@wtfl1981 said:
@happy tiger said:
Get rid of these fools now

Here they are being questioned about money needed to help the WESTS TIGERS FFS and they bring the old Wests V Balmain chestnut up again

Just hire 7 people who have the best interests of the WESTS TIGERS at heart

WT is a company.. This is business… Are those 7 people going to be aligned to the owners? Are they going to contribute millions to WT?

Wests vs Balmain crap is a identity matter.. This is a business/company ownership isssue

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

No the 7 people are going to give unbiased ,good governance to the Tigers without leaking crap to the media whenever they don't get their way

No company owner is going to hand over control to 7 'independents' (and owner keeps pouring $$ in) without a say.

Take emotion out of it.. Its business..

Find a wealthy private owner (with zero links to Balmain & Wests) who can (and willing) to takeover WT

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_
 
@wtfl1981 said:
@happy tiger said:
Get rid of these fools now

Here they are being questioned about money needed to help the WESTS TIGERS FFS and they bring the old Wests V Balmain chestnut up again

Just hire 7 people who have the best interests of the WESTS TIGERS at heart

WT is a company.. This is business… Are those 7 people going to be aligned to the owners? Are they going to contribute millions to WT?

Wests vs Balmain crap is a identity matter.. This is a business/company ownership isssue

_Posted using RoarFEED 2013_

Its not a company ownership issue…. Its a funding/solvency issue.

Wests are trying to gain more ownership by using funding as the catalyst.

Balmain dont have to agree on any of there demands, or the NRL's.
 
Pretty difficult to argue that Wests Ashfield shouldn't have more control of the board if they are the ones stumping up all the cash.

Personally, as an old Balmain fan, I don't give a hoot what the board composition is made up of. It could be 90% Wests, or 90% Balmain- doesn't matter.

So long as both sides of the JV are represented through funding, jersey design & gameday ground allocations, all I think any supporter of Wests Tigers wants is for the club to get stronger.

As of now, the current group has proven to be incapable of moving in the right direction.
 
Maybe ask Benny for some it, since **a)** he set Balmain on this path, and **b)** I'm sure he's got it in the bank from his various 'deals' he makes

Poor form by Bailey. Amateur politician crap that shows that $$$, not the JV, is really on his mind.
 
These r soles are killing the club - both sets of them. On the same day as the first grade side takes another almighty shellacking their priority is squabbling about board control. Sack the lot of them, I say, and get in management that cares about the future of the Wests Tigers instead of juvenile power games.

Full disclosure: I moved to Australia in the mid-2000s and have no history with either side of the merger. I am a Wests Tigers fan.
 

Latest posts

Members online

Back
Top