if it is reni i will have to take some points off my potter review. surely potter wouldn't take a sidewards step
i would be happy with patterson, from what i remember of him he was a good running forward capable of bending the line which is precisely what we need
i would also happily take one of the cowboys boys off their hands; looking at their players they have excessive stock and we could pick an unwanted one up relatively cheap; taumalolo, lowe, reithmuller etc
i hope we dont see croker and asotasi here, both of which are past it
in terms of the back
surely it would be a half to assist brooks and his development; anasta is past it and shouldnt be in first grade at all, let alone in the spine. sirro has been shown his future in the 2nd row and keeping him in the halves will eventually only hamper his development.
wallace, whilst not the greatest half going around, offers brooks a lot of assistance, his kicking is fairly reliable, he has big game experience (blues and finals)
where as with hunt we have versatility and if we sign him on a 2 year contract, with the option of extras we then have a contingency plan should brooks/moses not work out. if all three work out well, hunt is capable of coming off the bench, once we have a set of big forwards running around in 2016 (assuming we attract players and our juniors continue to develop)
I'm hoping potter brings some of his pommy relations over, and we can discover our own burgess bros or whatever