@ said:
Best response I've seen :roll
What did we get in return?
- Thread starter Talking_Tiger
- Start date
Best response I've seen :roll
Harvey
Well-known member
An inbred uncle again bad mouthing the club he supposedly loves in the media
Tweed_Tiger
Well-known member
We got a cure and its called Cleary
Tweed_Tiger
Well-known member
@ said:
Sick of him, now his nephew is gone hopefully he can stop talking about us. But I am sure he will take a jab when ever he is given the chance.
mike
Well-known member
@ said:
Exactly, he should have immediately been stood down and taken to a psychiatrist for a professional assessment of his mental state. Of course he would never have gone because it was basically BS just to get his way.
MightyTiger
New member
Nothing except getting rid of a selfish, self scented and disloyal little turd who was really starting to effect the team as a whole. Good riddance, karma will catch up to him.
MightyTiger
New member
Nothing except getting rid of a selfish, self scented and disloyal little turd who was really starting to effect the team as a whole. Good riddance, karma will catch up to him.
Club_Sandwich
New member
Really disappointed in this decision by the Tigers. It's a given that he couldn't have played FG for us again but he should have been sent to reserves to play out the rest of his contract, a contract he signed. Players are not above the club. The club is bigger than any player, whether they are named Tedesco, Woods, Benji, Prince, Addo-Carr or whatever.
Why should another team gain a player (albeit a poor one) mid season for free when we get nothing. It's besides the point that he is a terrible player. A player cannot demand anything of a club I don't care who the hell you are.
He signed a contract. If it was the other way around and we wanted to release him mid season against his wishes we'd be liable to compensation.
By releasing him and giving in to his immature and selfish demands we are made to look spineless and weak. We are seriously the joke of the NRL.
Could any of you imagine Bellamy, Des, Sticky or Wayne giving in and releasing a player mid season who acted like he did? No bloody way.
Unless we got something (or someone) out of this that hasn't been revealed yet, this decision just beggars belief and shows what a pathetic, amateur club we have become.
Why should another team gain a player (albeit a poor one) mid season for free when we get nothing. It's besides the point that he is a terrible player. A player cannot demand anything of a club I don't care who the hell you are.
He signed a contract. If it was the other way around and we wanted to release him mid season against his wishes we'd be liable to compensation.
By releasing him and giving in to his immature and selfish demands we are made to look spineless and weak. We are seriously the joke of the NRL.
Could any of you imagine Bellamy, Des, Sticky or Wayne giving in and releasing a player mid season who acted like he did? No bloody way.
Unless we got something (or someone) out of this that hasn't been revealed yet, this decision just beggars belief and shows what a pathetic, amateur club we have become.
jirskyr
Well-known member
@ said:
I think the point is that though lots of fans would ride the emotion and take pleasure from seeing Moses rot in reserves, the reality is $250K is a lot of cap space to set aside. You are biting your nose to spite your face there.
Sure players are being somewhat incentivised to act up if they want out of a contract, and maybe that gets worse from here on end, but the reality is if you compel someone to see out a contract that they don't want to, no matter how much moral high ground you have, that person is a very good chance of underperforming towards misperforming and starting to be a negative asset. Then you are keeping them on just for principle.
andrew 474
New member
We got the chance to see him shine in his first game with the eels , then we all know how much he tanked the last couple of games , yep a player you want at your club , NOT , he will get what he deserves , we are better without him or any other player who is not on Ivan's Big Bus , screw Moses , he is a grub
Fade_To_Black
New member
@ said:
Papalii's sizeable kneecap colliding ferociously with the bridge of Mitchy's nose this weekend would be like a fair dinkum modern-day fairytale. Please make it happen Papa!
VanillaThunder
New member
@ said:
I'll disagree with you there. Giving him up for nothing might not be the best football decision (though arguably with his efforts the last few weeks it has been), but allowing the drama to play on week in, week out with constant media speculation and the ever-present welfare shadow hanging around makes perfect business sense. The Tigers as a business and financial operation serve only to gain by moving him on now.
Club_Sandwich
New member
@ said:
Hahahaha we can only hope
If we had stuck it in reggies, its manager and uncle would have made certain that the media had a field day with WT. The poor mentally unstable boy etc etc.
The timing was actually good. By having the really satisfying dump when they did, it showed up its little 'poor bugger me act' for exactly what it was. Uncabenny then had to come to the media to try to spin it. Its a good show and puts the whole family values on display.
The timing was actually good. By having the really satisfying dump when they did, it showed up its little 'poor bugger me act' for exactly what it was. Uncabenny then had to come to the media to try to spin it. Its a good show and puts the whole family values on display.
@ said:
Lawrence's is contract is taken up now by the Long Serving Player allowance that sits outside the Cap..
I think the $$ will be used on the mid season transfer of Lolohea or someone and extending the likes of McIlwrick or Liddle…
