@happy tiger said:@Pokies said:What's lack of depth got to do with a coaches ability to motivate his playing roster?
_Posted using RoarFEED 4.2.0_
Ah heaps
They might be playing at their best already
Motivation only gets you so far ,talent ,size and speed along with motivation will beat motivation every time
Agree motivation will only get you so far, like you say if both teams turn up with the right attitude then the team with the better size, speed etc has an advantage. Though i wouldnt go as far as saying they will win every time or even most of the time. There are plenty of other factors that will determine the outcome.
I think its safe to say coaching tactics play a fairly big part. A top coach can hide his own teams weaknesses and expose his opponents with a well thought out gameplan. Also a top coach can motivate and keep his players switched on alot better than a poor coach. Do you think Terry Lamb had the respect of the playing staff when he laughed at Hoppas inserting his finger in places it didnt belong whilst doing video sessions? Would Paul Langmack command the same respect as Craig Bellamy down in Melbourne? the answers are obvious. Not all coaches are equal, same as players.
I still see no correlation in your post regarding squad depth and motivation. They are 2 seperate factors in a multitude of reasons that determine a teams amount of success or lack of.
Playing roster is one reason for our position on the ladder but so is poor coaching and IMO they are 2 seperate issues.
Genuinly interested to know if you believe that the players in our squad are playing their best?