Why don’t our forwards go forward?

[Geo]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

 

[TigerSJ]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

The point being made here is that since we could only manage 4 tackles in the panthers 20 in a whole game then the guys who should have been making yardage were not doing the job. You can blame Brooks for a lot of things but not this, and he also is not the reason we lost that game.

 

[hobbo1]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

 

[Geo]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

 

[hobbo1]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

No
Anything goes in any thread these days

 

[Geo]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

No
Anything goes in any thread these days

We can discuss that anywhere..

1st you said our powderpuff's wouldn't make a top team...then you said when we get in the opposition 20 Brooks stuff it up anyway..I pointed out we didn't even get there to stuff it up..

We barely made it out of our own half in the 2nd half and not once into the 20..that has nothing to do with stats that's what happened..

You would rather just bash Brooks than discuss any of that..which is fine..It is time for him to go I have no issue at all with that..it's not working and probably never will so best for both parties

There was a thread saying how great our future pack is going to be..we have one rookie coming who is a plodder apparently..Brooks being here or not is not going to change it.

S

 

[JC99]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

There’s plenty of teams worse than us where their halfback has more than 1 try assist. Foran has 10 in 11 games for bulldogs and our forwards rolled theirs.

 

[Geo]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

There’s plenty of teams worse than us where their halfback has more than 1 try assist. Foran has 10 in 11 games for bulldogs and our forwards rolled theirs.

Cool..lets aspire to be the Bulldogs..

 

[hobbo1]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

No
Anything goes in any thread these days

We can discuss that anywhere..

1st you said our powderpuff's wouldn't make a top team...then you said when we get in the opposition 20 Brooks stuff it up anyway..I pointed out we didn't even get there to stuff it up..

We barely made it out of our own half in the 2nd half and not once into the 20..that has nothing to do with stats that's what happened..

You would rather just bash Brooks than discuss any of that..which is fine..It is time for him to go I have no issue at all with that..it's not working and probably never will so best for both parties

There was a thread saying how great our future pack is going to be..we have one rookie coming who is a plodder apparently..Brooks being here or not is not going to change it.

S

Not just last nights game , every game when we’re in striking distance ..

S

 

[Geo]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

No
Anything goes in any thread these days

We can discuss that anywhere..

1st you said our powderpuff's wouldn't make a top team...then you said when we get in the opposition 20 Brooks stuff it up anyway..I pointed out we didn't even get there to stuff it up..

We barely made it out of our own half in the 2nd half and not once into the 20..that has nothing to do with stats that's what happened..

You would rather just bash Brooks than discuss any of that..which is fine..It is time for him to go I have no issue at all with that..it's not working and probably never will so best for both parties

There was a thread saying how great our future pack is going to be..we have one rookie coming who is a plodder apparently..Brooks being here or not is not going to change it.

S

Not just last nights game , every game when we’re in striking distance ..

OK every game..now what

 

[avocadoontoast]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

There’s plenty of teams worse than us where their halfback has more than 1 try assist. Foran has 10 in 11 games for bulldogs and our forwards rolled theirs.

Foran is miles ahead of brooks.

 

[hobbo1]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

No
Anything goes in any thread these days

We can discuss that anywhere..

1st you said our powderpuff's wouldn't make a top team...then you said when we get in the opposition 20 Brooks stuff it up anyway..I pointed out we didn't even get there to stuff it up..

We barely made it out of our own half in the 2nd half and not once into the 20..that has nothing to do with stats that's what happened..

You would rather just bash Brooks than discuss any of that..which is fine..It is time for him to go I have no issue at all with that..it's not working and probably never will so best for both parties

There was a thread saying how great our future pack is going to be..we have one rookie coming who is a plodder apparently..Brooks being here or not is not going to change it.

S

Not just last nights game , every game when we’re in striking distance ..


OK every game..now what

Shop him around

 

[Geo]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

No
Anything goes in any thread these days

We can discuss that anywhere..

1st you said our powderpuff's wouldn't make a top team...then you said when we get in the opposition 20 Brooks stuff it up anyway..I pointed out we didn't even get there to stuff it up..

We barely made it out of our own half in the 2nd half and not once into the 20..that has nothing to do with stats that's what happened..

You would rather just bash Brooks than discuss any of that..which is fine..It is time for him to go I have no issue at all with that..it's not working and probably never will so best for both parties

There was a thread saying how great our future pack is going to be..we have one rookie coming who is a plodder apparently..Brooks being here or not is not going to change it.

S

Not just last nights game , every game when we’re in striking distance ..


OK every game..now what

Shop him around

Sure already said that what's best for both parties..

Who in the forward pack should we keep..?

 

[hobbo1]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

There’s plenty of teams worse than us where their halfback has more than 1 try assist. Foran has 10 in 11 games for bulldogs and our forwards rolled theirs.

Foran is miles ahead of brooks.

He is but his body is busted

 

[avocadoontoast]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

There’s plenty of teams worse than us where their halfback has more than 1 try assist. Foran has 10 in 11 games for bulldogs and our forwards rolled theirs.

Foran is miles ahead of brooks.

He is but his body is busted

True but you could get him for half the price of brooks. And he’d get twice as many try assists playing half as many games.

 

[InBenjiWeTrust]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

No
Anything goes in any thread these days

We can discuss that anywhere..

1st you said our powderpuff's wouldn't make a top team...then you said when we get in the opposition 20 Brooks stuff it up anyway..I pointed out we didn't even get there to stuff it up..

We barely made it out of our own half in the 2nd half and not once into the 20..that has nothing to do with stats that's what happened..

You would rather just bash Brooks than discuss any of that..which is fine..It is time for him to go I have no issue at all with that..it's not working and probably never will so best for both parties

There was a thread saying how great our future pack is going to be..we have one rookie coming who is a plodder apparently..Brooks being here or not is not going to change it.

S

Not just last nights game , every game when we’re in striking distance ..


OK every game..now what

Shop him around

Sure already said that what's best for both parties..

Who in the forward pack should we keep..?

props I would keep are Aloiai, Mikele, and Musgrave, we badly need 2 more!
Even if we have Thurston/Cronk pair, they would be as useless, when we cannot get more
then 4 sets in the opposition 20!

 

[Geo]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

No
Anything goes in any thread these days

We can discuss that anywhere..

1st you said our powderpuff's wouldn't make a top team...then you said when we get in the opposition 20 Brooks stuff it up anyway..I pointed out we didn't even get there to stuff it up..

We barely made it out of our own half in the 2nd half and not once into the 20..that has nothing to do with stats that's what happened..

You would rather just bash Brooks than discuss any of that..which is fine..It is time for him to go I have no issue at all with that..it's not working and probably never will so best for both parties

There was a thread saying how great our future pack is going to be..we have one rookie coming who is a plodder apparently..Brooks being here or not is not going to change it.

S

Not just last nights game , every game when we’re in striking distance ..


OK every game..now what

Shop him around

Sure already said that what's best for both parties..

Who in the forward pack should we keep..?

props I would keep are Aloiai, Mikele, and Musgrave, we badly need 2 more!
Even if we have Thurston/Cronk pair, they would be as useless, when we cannot get more
then 4 sets in the opposition 20!

Would have been great to get 4 sets..

But it was 4 tackles ..total..

 

[hobbo1]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

No
Anything goes in any thread these days

We can discuss that anywhere..

1st you said our powderpuff's wouldn't make a top team...then you said when we get in the opposition 20 Brooks stuff it up anyway..I pointed out we didn't even get there to stuff it up..

We barely made it out of our own half in the 2nd half and not once into the 20..that has nothing to do with stats that's what happened..

You would rather just bash Brooks than discuss any of that..which is fine..It is time for him to go I have no issue at all with that..it's not working and probably never will so best for both parties

There was a thread saying how great our future pack is going to be..we have one rookie coming who is a plodder apparently..Brooks being here or not is not going to change it.

S

Not just last nights game , every game when we’re in striking distance ..


OK every game..now what

Shop him around

Sure already said that what's best for both parties..

Who in the forward pack should we keep..?

At this stage ...
Luciano
Blore
Garner

 

[JC99]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

There’s plenty of teams worse than us where their halfback has more than 1 try assist. Foran has 10 in 11 games for bulldogs and our forwards rolled theirs.

Foran is miles ahead of brooks.

Apparently if you don’t have a good pack In front of you, you can escape all blame. Foran playing behind a worse team is literally 10 times better than brooks. Even Lachlan Lewis has more try assists and he’s garbage

 

[avocadoontoast]

They don't go forward as we have way too many of the same type. I have said for ages that you can have a Huth...you can have an ET...you can have a Syefarth...you can have a Twal...you can even have a a Chee Kam...

But you sure as hell can't have them all. That is way, way too many light weights / guys who do not bend the line. Guys who never wind up and run hard.

They are all crap and wouldn’t make the bench in most top 8 sides ...
Powder puffs

but....never mind..

Starts with brooks though...he’s the conductor or so he keeps telling us ..”it’s my team “

A team with a pack of white marshmellows who wouldn't make the bench of a top team..

These blokes have played footy all their lives mostly don't think conducting is the issue...

When we get into the opposition 20 Brooks stinks it up anyway

Maybe that’s why the pack has given up

Can’t even put up a toro or throw a spiral pass

He’s ?

We had 4 that right 4 tackles in the Pamfers 20 in 80 mins...

English please school teacher

Tackles in opposition 20 Wests Tigers 4
Pamfers 36

https://www.foxsports.com.au/nrl/nrl-premiership/match-centre/NRL20201606/stats

Tackles in the 30 ?

Brooks is done mate
The tribe has spoken ....let it/him go

Already said it fine numerous times

Was also 4..with 0 in the 2nd half..

clutching with stats ....

Isn't this about the forwards going forward..

They didn't..

but like usual it's layed on Brooks..

There’s plenty of teams worse than us where their halfback has more than 1 try assist. Foran has 10 in 11 games for bulldogs and our forwards rolled theirs.

Foran is miles ahead of brooks.

Apparently if you don’t have a good pack In front of you, you can escape all blame. Foran playing behind a worse team is literally 10 times better than brooks. Even Lachlan Lewis has more try assists and he’s garbage

Even in games this year where our forwards have dominated he’s been terrible.