WHY THE INJURIES
- Thread starter guesty123
- Start date
happy_tiger
Well-known member
@guesty123 said:
Sheens made the Woods call not the members of the Forum Guesty and Sheens put Moltzen at fullback when he has Brown in squad not the Forum .Why did we loss that game Guesty . No go forward 707 metres in 80 minutes . Fullback he thought ball was covered in spiders everytime they bombed . Who made those calls ???
-moltzens main position is fullback common sense putting him there if mckinnon is injured (everyone on this forum would put him there if we knew mckinnon was injured. (not sheens fault he played bad.)
-Refs calls were inconsistent as F….. (not sheens fault)
- Stupid mistakes at stupid times (not sheens fault)
\
\
Not picking woods is only decision i disagree with.
-Refs calls were inconsistent as F….. (not sheens fault)
- Stupid mistakes at stupid times (not sheens fault)
\
\
Not picking woods is only decision i disagree with.
southerntiger
New member
Guesty
I defend Tim a lot on this forum but tonight I will leave the fight to you.
Injuries are factor but that doesnt explain picking a bench lighter than Chris Sandow.
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
I defend Tim a lot on this forum but tonight I will leave the fight to you.
Injuries are factor but that doesnt explain picking a bench lighter than Chris Sandow.
\
\
Posted using RoarFEED
happy_tiger
Well-known member
@guesty123 said:
Not if I had Mitch Brown in squad I wouldn't have and Meaney to play wing and Moltzen or Dwyer at centre . We knew refs would be bad especially Hayne and inexperienced ref followed his lead . Why change 6 7 or 9 when you won last game by 24 .???
Guesty, with all due respect you are dead wrong about Moltz as a fullback. He has proven time and again that he cant handle the position.
Go back through the threads…you'll see that a number of us have been saying this for a couple of years now.
A tiny bench with little impact is Sheen's fault also.
Go back through the threads…you'll see that a number of us have been saying this for a couple of years now.
A tiny bench with little impact is Sheen's fault also.
Tigerdave
Well-known member
Sheens picked the bench
Sheens put Moltzen at fullback, when it has never worked out well for us, he's not a fullback.
Sheens put out on the field the 3rd different halves partnership…..it's Round 6, which only causes confusion in attack, which it did, because he's got it in his head that fullback is far more important than consistency in the halves to provide direction for the side.
\
\
The halves should have remained the same as last week and Mitch should have moved to fullback.
Sheens put Moltzen at fullback, when it has never worked out well for us, he's not a fullback.
Sheens put out on the field the 3rd different halves partnership…..it's Round 6, which only causes confusion in attack, which it did, because he's got it in his head that fullback is far more important than consistency in the halves to provide direction for the side.
\
\
The halves should have remained the same as last week and Mitch should have moved to fullback.
MightyMaggy
New member
@guesty123 said:
WHAT DID WE DO WRONG!!!!!!!!!The coach picked the wrong team!
Surely, after a big win last week and the injuries to some key players, you would make as few changes as possible for this week's game.
Tim Moltzen, while he may be a good half or five-eight, has proven on ALL occasions that he has played full-back, THAT HE IS NOT A FULL-BACK!
Please, Mr. Sheens, let's not go back to the combination of a mini-sized pack with the midget bench that failed many times over the last few seasons. IT DOES NOT WORK IN THIS DAY AND AGE! Why not try using one strength we have in the bigger, up-and-coming, young forwards?
tiger_tigers
New member
my main fault was the game plan he adopted after we led 14-0 ….
as for being brain dead ... lol... thanks the laughs you brightened up what was a very dark night ......99 % of people in here dont want a bar of moltz at fullback .....moltz dosent want a bar of it.....
as for being brain dead ... lol... thanks the laughs you brightened up what was a very dark night ......99 % of people in here dont want a bar of moltz at fullback .....moltz dosent want a bar of it.....
G
Guest
Guest
@happy tiger said:
Woods is apparently injured.
fulleightyminutes
New member
@willow said:
Well that explains it, thanks Willow. In hindsight Moors might have been a better option. One positive though was we gave up stupid penalties, dropped the ball over and over and over again and still tackled and tackled and tackled for 35 minutes of that second half. I thought the defensive effort, considering the lack of ball (and wasting it when we did have it) was admirable. In attack I have never seen the team so clueless.
[quote="Tigerdave"
\
\
The halves should have remained the same as last week and Mitch should have moved to fullback.
\
\
It should have been as simple as that. Bring on Miller in the second half to run around their tired forwards. Add one big forward to the bench and we might have been able to get out of our half occasionally.
\
\
The halves should have remained the same as last week and Mitch should have moved to fullback.
\
\
It should have been as simple as that. Bring on Miller in the second half to run around their tired forwards. Add one big forward to the bench and we might have been able to get out of our half occasionally.
851
Well-known member
@guesty123 said:
If Moltzen's main position is fullback,his NRL career is over,he is without doubt the worst fullback I have ever seen,his lack of courage,inability to catch the ball on the full and no desire what so ever are wearing thin on me,he needs to go back to reserve grade.
Moltzen didn't play half last week, he hid in the centres.
Moltzen should be sat down into a television this week and made to watch David Mead's kick returns. He is pint sized, and everytime ran back hard and hit the defenders hard.
Moltzen should be sat down into a television this week and made to watch David Mead's kick returns. He is pint sized, and everytime ran back hard and hit the defenders hard.
You can't blame Moltzen for being played out of position - we had TWO fullbacks already in the squad.
When will Sheens get it into his head that Moltzen is NOT a fullback?
Yes - ref's were hopeless
Yes - we bumbled like only we can
Yes - Sheens disrupted the team by not playing guys in their best positions.
Last week Moltzen plays half and we win by 24- even though young Miller played ok it was always going to be hard going 80 minutes against Prince.
Brown has shown repeatedly he is a class fullback - I can't even understand why Sheens picked Meaney on the bench ( no disrespect to Meaney )
When will Sheens get it into his head that Moltzen is NOT a fullback?
Yes - ref's were hopeless
Yes - we bumbled like only we can
Yes - Sheens disrupted the team by not playing guys in their best positions.
Last week Moltzen plays half and we win by 24- even though young Miller played ok it was always going to be hard going 80 minutes against Prince.
Brown has shown repeatedly he is a class fullback - I can't even understand why Sheens picked Meaney on the bench ( no disrespect to Meaney )
Staff online
-
DempsModerator