WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS

Status
Not open for further replies.
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435170) said:
From the horse's mouth
https://www.facebook.com/107999601094256/posts/257129532847928/

He’s a cardiologist. His is talking outside his area of expertise. That makes him as about as relevant as you and I.
 
@harvey said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1434923) said:
@radoush said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1434901) said:
@harvey said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SORTS](/post/1434888) said:
@radoush said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SORTS](/post/1434856) said:
Why discriminate against people if your vaccinated you have your shield wrapped around you

And why would Business discriminate against making a dollar ? 40 percent won't get vaccinated

In basic terms there are groups of people that are unable to be vaccinated for valid reasons including their age, alergies, being immunocompromised etc. who are at high risk if they get ill.

That is what shits me about people who refuse vaccination talking about their right to personal freedom and their right to choose. I absolutely agree with those rights, as long as they live somewhere where they are completely self sufficient and have no interaction with other humans that do not share their beliefs.

Most kids that die from whooping cough are too young to be vaccinated and have picked it up from someone wandering around in the community with it who has chosen not to be vaccinated because they consider the risk to themselves low.

If you vaccinated it does not stop you from getting Covid or passing it on so you will still hurt the people you mentioned

It does not stop 100% but greatly improves your chances of catching it (80% less likely to catch it) and if you have it the viral load is much lower which reduces your chances of passing it on.

Forget going to the movies & sports, if you were living with someone undergoing chemo would you get vaccinated against those illnesses you could to reduce the chances of you getting one of them and passing it on to someone that was unable to fight it off?

Iam living with someone going through chemo and yes I have had two jabs and so has my wife who is going through chemo.
 
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435081) said:
@harvey said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435068) said:
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435059) said:
Will not be getting the experimental jab. As Harvey alluded to, it does not work the way a normal safe vaccine works. A vaccine normally offers 2 things:
1. Immunity
2. Stop transmission

This jab does neither.

There is alao NO data on long term effects of the jab. Some experts are saying it may cause auto immune disorders, alzheimers in the elderly and blood clots leading to death (this we already know).

Unfortunately alot of this information (while available), is being heavily censored.

Please don't misquote me. No vaccination offers complete immunity to catching an illness, they stimulate your immune system so that you are able to fight the virus off before it can do serious damage.

Thats what immunity is. Teaching your antibodies to attack the antigen. This jab does not do this in that way. It causes RNA to create the spike protein. There has never been a vaccine that works in this way

They've been working on the science behind mRNA vaccines for 30 years. They were already preparing the technology for clinical trials when COVID hit.

AZ isn't an mRNA vaccine - get that if you have some unfounded suspicion of mRNA vaccines.

Also, again, what long-term data do you need? There are literally billions of doses been given now. What are your expectations for safety data in several years from now? Vaccines typically cause effects rapidly, hence why they observe you for 15-30 mins then send you home.
 
@compensate said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435160) said:
@coivtny said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1434745) said:
I'd get vaccinated to stop watching them.

Just don’t switch the tele on every week. Not that hard. Real fans sit there and suffer

Really!
 
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435155) said:
Ive had 20 of my relatives overseas contract covid and ALL 20 have recovered. Including 1 aunty who is a 75 year old diabetic and another aunty whi had no symptoms at all.

COVID is definitely real but it mass vaccinations are not the answer. Most of the hospitalisations in UK and Israel are from people who have already been vaccinated.

Im not here to change anyone's mind. But coercion to get vaccinated is absolutely criminal. Especially considering numerous doctors on the frontline were having fantastic results using Ivermectin (a drug which the clinical evidence shows is not statistically effective). But do a google search on the drug and

So unless one of your relatives dies it's not an issue?

We have a long history of eliminating disease with vaccinations. What do you believe is the answer if it's not mass vaccination?

As for Ivermectin (a drug which the clinical evidence shows is not statistically effective), it's from the Donald Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon school of medicine along with Chloroquine and bleach.

Tell me, if you had cancer, heart disease, asthma or diabetes etc, would you listen to the doctors and take the medication?
 
@swag_tiger said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435110) said:
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435088) said:
@swag_tiger said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435073) said:
@harvey said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435068) said:
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435059) said:
Will not be getting the experimental jab. As Harvey alluded to, it does not work the way a normal safe vaccine works. A vaccine normally offers 2 things:
1. Immunity
2. Stop transmission

This jab does neither.

There is alao NO data on long term effects of the jab. Some experts are saying it may cause auto immune disorders, alzheimers in the elderly and blood clots leading to death (this we already know).

Unfortunately alot of this information (while available), is being heavily censored.

Please don't misquote me. No vaccination offers complete immunity to catching an illness, they stimulate your immune system so that you are able to fight the virus off before it can do serious damage.

Covid is like the Flu. There's not going to be a vaccine that will counter the virus permanently. New vaccines will always have to be updated.

What's the point of getting 'vaccinated' against covid then? Why not just let your natural immune system fight it? Thats what our immune systems are therebfor

@swag_tiger said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435073) said:
@harvey said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435068) said:
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435059) said:
Will not be getting the experimental jab. As Harvey alluded to, it does not work the way a normal safe vaccine works. A vaccine normally offers 2 things:
1. Immunity
2. Stop transmission

This jab does neither.

There is alao NO data on long term effects of the jab. Some experts are saying it may cause auto immune disorders, alzheimers in the elderly and blood clots leading to death (this we already know).

Unfortunately alot of this information (while available), is being heavily censored.

Please don't misquote me. No vaccination offers complete immunity to catching an illness, they stimulate your immune system so that you are able to fight the virus off before it can do serious damage.

Covid is like the Flu. There's not going to be a vaccine that will counter the virus permanently. New vaccines will always have to be updated.

Whats the point of getting vaccinated against covid then? Why not just let your immune system deal with it? Thats what our natural immune system is meant to do. Attack foreign material

It's a new virus. We haven't adapted the perfect immune system to fight it yet. From your logic I guess you don't take the flu jab either.

Exactly. You definitely can let everyone's immune system deal with it, that's definitely an option. It's a high death toll option unfortunately.

The unvaccinated death rate from COVID appears to have settled around 1%.

So to let every Australian catch COVID and "hope for the best" will kill 250 thousand Australians. It will kill 50 thousand Kiwis and 3.3 million Americans. It would kill 21 million Chinese. It would kill 70 million humans, if everyone eventually caught it.

Or you can just get your shot. I don't specifically understand what @philgood's concerns are. Adverse reactions? Government tracking devices? COVID hoax?

Vaccines work, it is an outstanding medical and scientific consensus.
 
@mike said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1434965) said:
@radoush said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1434856) said:
Why discriminate against people if your vaccinated you have your shield wrapped around you

**And why would Business discriminate against making a dollar** ? 40 percent won't get vaccinated

Ultimately Workcover might have something to say about that. I think that is where the compliance will eventually come from.

Talking about this yesterday, OH and S might be the tool the authorities use to exclude unvaxed people from all sorts of places…and rightly so
 
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435155) said:
COVID is definitely real but it mass vaccinations are not the answer. Most of the hospitalisations in UK and Israel are from people who have already been vaccinated.

NOPE THIS IS NOT TRUE.
 
@voice_of_reason said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435148) said:
It amazes me that at 4.3 MILLION deaths already we’re still debating whether protection is a good idea. Not to mention the many millions more with long COVID and who may never live a normal life again.

I was going to say that I bet he hasn't lost a relative to COVID. And he confirms it.
 
@mike said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435176) said:
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435170) said:
From the horse's mouth
https://www.facebook.com/107999601094256/posts/257129532847928/

He’s a cardiologist. His is talking outside his area of expertise. That makes him as about as relevant as you and I.

Mate what are you talking about. He was one of the doctors on the frontline treating covid patients when other doctors were telling them to go home and wait it out. He was the first doctor to write a published paper on how to treat covid.
 
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435155) said:
Ive had 20 of my relatives overseas contract covid and ALL 20 have recovered. Including 1 aunty who is a 75 year old diabetic and another aunty whi had no symptoms at all.

Do you have 100 relatives? Odds are one of them would die.

You do know 20 is a very crap sample size, right? I could find 20 people that fell off buildings and were not badly hurt, but doesn't make falling off buildings a good idea.
 
@jirskyr said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435191) said:
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435155) said:
Ive had 20 of my relatives overseas contract covid and ALL 20 have recovered. Including 1 aunty who is a 75 year old diabetic and another aunty whi had no symptoms at all.

Do you have 100 relatives? Odds are one of them would die.

You do know 20 is a very crap sample size, right? I could find 20 people that fell off buildings and were not badly hurt, but doesn't make falling off buildings a good idea.

Im middle eastern. Believe me I have 100s
 
So, back on topic, yeah, I'd get the vaccine* if it meant that live events were a goer.

*Already had my first jab anyway
 
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435162) said:
Disinformation is what you'll find

<sigh>

Have you ever considered the misinformation is what you're reading?

Dr Peter McCullough, the Cardiologist (not epidemiologist) who is being investigated along with some of his 'colleagues', for peddling discredited information about COVID treatments. He was behind the Chloroquine nonsense, a conspiracy the vaccines are a bio-weapon and suggests it's the government trying to kill off millions of people - the same people who vote for them and whose tax supports the country. This is the person you're saying to believe?

Mind you, he's from Texas so would be a Trump, who is a convicted Rapist and Felon lackey. I'm sure Fox news would stand behind him.
 
Sooooo.. anyone getting vaccinated to be able to go to the footy..
 
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435190) said:
@mike said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435176) said:
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435170) said:
From the horse's mouth
https://www.facebook.com/107999601094256/posts/257129532847928/

He’s a cardiologist. His is talking outside his area of expertise. That makes him as about as relevant as you and I.

Mate what are you talking about. He was one of the doctors on the frontline treating covid patients when other doctors were telling them to go home and wait it out. He was the first doctor to write a published paper on how to treat covid.

He has made multiple false claims about Covid19 and the Covid19 vaccinations and natural immunity. He’s irrelevant. He is just a cardiologist and way out of his area of expertise. A lackey of a certain previous President.
 
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435190) said:
Mate what are you talking about. He was one of the doctors on the frontline treating covid patients when other doctors were telling them to go home and wait it out. He was the first doctor to write a published paper on how to treat covid.

And he was wrong. He's being investigated for pushing fraudulent, wrong COVID advice.

I don't mean to be disrespectful but if you're listening to this guy for COVID information you need to seriously re-assess your medical advice.
 
@voice_of_reason said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435200) said:
@philgood said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435190) said:
Mate what are you talking about. He was one of the doctors on the frontline treating covid patients when other doctors were telling them to go home and wait it out. He was the first doctor to write a published paper on how to treat covid.

And he was wrong. He's being investigated for pushing fraudulent, wrong COVID advice.

I don't mean to be disrespectful but if you're listening to this guy for COVID information you need to seriously re-assess your medical advice.

You're the one that needs to start thinking for himself. He and many other doctors like him helped many patients through covid treatments. But no, the only way to navigate this is through unsafe experimental jab, whose long term effects are UNKNOWN
 
@jirskyr said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1435126) said:
@voice_of_reason said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SPORTS](/post/1434808) said:
@jirskyr said in [WOULD YOU VACCINATE TO BE ABLE TO WATCH SORTS](/post/1434800) said:
Just ask them what they think about polio and smallpox.

Exactly. I went overseas in 1975 and needed Smallpox, Yellow Fever and Typhoid shots before we could go. Why is a vaccination certificate so different now?

Year 7 at school the girls all got Rubella shots. In primary school we all got the Sabin Oral Polio vaccine - no complaints from anyone back then.

People used to be grateful and there was no social media to fuel conspiratorial tendencies.

I don't understand how this has happened. I've shown the facts in relation to the vaccines previously. The odds are so far in your favor if you take the vaccine. It's like 100 to 1 or something like that and we are talking about your health. Can you imagine not taking those odds.

I can't believe people don't understand the facts. It's alternate reality stuff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top