WT heading towards financial sustainability?

…..... The Magpies, whose successful Ashfield licensed club now owns 75 per cent of Wests Tigers, have the option of buying the remaining quarter, or partnering with a businessman who has been a long time Wests supporter......

Oh really?
 
@ said:
As a (very) old Magpie, I can't agree that we should be called Wests Magpies. Both clubs agreed that it should be Wests Tigers and the situation is that Wests, a couple of years back, granted Balmain 25% of the club even though Balmain were broke and in debt to the NRL. If Balmain can't repay the NRL on time, then they will cease to have any part of Wests Tigers.

I just think the club that we follow now is and always will be Wests Tigers, it is registered with the NRL under this name and they will never agree to a name change, which, in my opinion, is for the best. The thing that we all should acknowledge is that this club sprang from the Magpies and the Tigers and we shouldn't forget our history.

Go you mighty Wests Tigers!!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...

Yep …. I agree totally. I supported West’s magpies since mid Sixties through all the (few) good times and (many) dissapintments.
This talk of West’s magpies is just rubbish and should not be and is not an issue to be dug up, any more. West’s group are the owners of WT and yes Balmain side got us out of relegation and yes we got Balmain out of financial difficulties. End of story.
We are and the only way to survive further is under the West’s Tigers banner. And anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool.
The Tigers brand is our survival and underpins our viability.
West’s and Balmain history should and will always survive. But we should be beyond infighting about this. We have enough problems scratching a competitive environment for our supporters in the company of premiership heavyweights who are tearing everything around them apart.
We have a new generation of supporters who don’t deserve this mindless pettiness of dinasours who refuse to die.
 
@ said:
@ said:
As a (very) old Magpie, I can't agree that we should be called Wests Magpies. Both clubs agreed that it should be Wests Tigers and the situation is that Wests, a couple of years back, granted Balmain 25% of the club even though Balmain were broke and in debt to the NRL. If Balmain can't repay the NRL on time, then they will cease to have any part of Wests Tigers.

I just think the club that we follow now is and always will be Wests Tigers, it is registered with the NRL under this name and they will never agree to a name change, which, in my opinion, is for the best. The thing that we all should acknowledge is that this club sprang from the Magpies and the Tigers and we shouldn't forget our history.

Go you mighty Wests Tigers!!!!!!!!!

Yep …. I agree totally. I supported West’s magpies since mid Sixties through all the (few) good times and (many) dissapintments.
This talk of West’s magpies is just rubbish and should not be and is not an issue to be dug up, any more. West’s group are the owners of WT and yes Balmain side got us out of relegation and yes we got Balmain out of financial difficulties. End of story.
We are and the only way to survive further is under the West’s Tigers banner. And anyone who thinks otherwise is a fool.
The Tigers brand is our survival and underpins our viability.
West’s and Balmain history should and will always survive. But we should be beyond infighting about this. We have enough problems scratching a competitive environment for our supporters in the company of premiership heavyweights who are tearing everything around them apart.
We have a new generation of supporters who don’t deserve this mindless pettiness of dinasours who refuse to die.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Agreed
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
I think Balmain owe Wests Ashfield money… and we under any banner are clear to the nrl.

The sooner the better that everybody including the media understand that the WestsTigers are not a joint venture they are owned by the West’s group that paid out 20 million to the Nrl to cover Balmains debt.
IMO the club will never have its own identity until the realities of the situation is made clear and people do not think otherwise .

Why do we not have our own identity?

Because the club is owned by Wests.

Why they loaned Balmain money is beyond me. They will never get it back.

West's Magpies should be the clubs identity.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Never will be - just wishful thinking on your part.

NRL have stated Tiger stays. That is our identity.
 
@ said:
…..... The Magpies, whose successful Ashfield licensed club now owns 75 per cent of Wests Tigers, have the option of buying the remaining quarter, or partnering with a businessman who has been a long time Wests supporter......

Oh really?
Click to expand...

Harry T or some other mystery guy?
 
@ said:
@ said:
…..... The Magpies, whose successful Ashfield licensed club now owns 75 per cent of Wests Tigers, have the option of buying the remaining quarter, or partnering with a businessman who has been a long time Wests supporter......

Oh really?

Harry T or some other mystery guy?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Probably Lee Hagipantelis from Brydens. Althugh he seems to be from the Balmain side. Maybe someone else?

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/wests-tigers-major-sponsor-interested-in-buying-stake-in-nrl-franchise-20160217-gmwn4t.html
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
…..... The Magpies, whose successful Ashfield licensed club now owns 75 per cent of Wests Tigers, have the option of buying the remaining quarter, or partnering with a businessman who has been a long time Wests supporter......

Oh really?

Harry T or some other mystery guy?

Probably Lee Hagipantelis from Brydens. Althugh he seems to be from the Balmain side. Maybe someone else?

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/wests-tigers-major-sponsor-interested-in-buying-stake-in-nrl-franchise-20160217-gmwn4t.html
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Maybe the guy who owns Jaycar? It's a bit if a tease from Masters.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
I think Balmain owe the NRL money not Wests Tigers

I think Balmain owe Wests Ashfield money… and we under any banner are clear to the nrl.

The sooner the better that everybody including the media understand that the WestsTigers are not a joint venture they are owned by the West’s group that paid out 20 million to the Nrl to cover Balmains debt.
IMO the club will never have its own identity until the realities of the situation is made clear and people do not think otherwise .

Why do we not have our own identity?
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Because the media and most fans of other clubs perceive Wests Tigers as a rebadged Balmain - and people like Blocker Roach, Bwaith and a few others perpetuate this perception by constantly calling them Balmain during games. We still have the media reporting WT are in hock to the NRL - Wests Tigers have never owed the NRL a cent - people complain of this in the media but its ignored. Wests Ashfield does nothing to change this.
 
The reason people like Col and others on here still live in hope of the old Magpies back in the NRL is because Wests Ashfield insisted on having Western Suburbs Magpies as our ISP team.

I think the Ashfield board must think they are getting something for their money by doing this but as per this thread again it does nothing but cause division.

I am a Wests Tigers supporter, not a Western Suburbs Magpies supporter.
 
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
@ said:
I think Balmain owe Wests Ashfield money… and we under any banner are clear to the nrl.

The sooner the better that everybody including the media understand that the WestsTigers are not a joint venture they are owned by the West’s group that paid out 20 million to the Nrl to cover Balmains debt.
IMO the club will never have its own identity until the realities of the situation is made clear and people do not think otherwise .

Why do we not have our own identity?

Because the media and most fans of other clubs perceive Wests Tigers as a rebadged Balmain - and people like Blocker Roach, Bwaith and a few others perpetuate this perception by constantly calling them Balmain during games. We still have the media reporting WT are in hock to the NRL - Wests Tigers have never owed the NRL a cent - people complain of this in the media but its ignored. Wests Ashfield does nothing to change this.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Yep - that’s fair. I’m ex Balmain and I cringe when I hear us referred to as black and gold. We are black, white and gold
 
18 years as a JV and people are still squabbling over Balmain and Wests. We are Wests tigers now. Embrace our identity but also embrace our 2 club history. It's not hard to understand that had we not merged neither of our clubs would of survived. If it means that much to old die hards follow magpies in ISP or pull out some old videos of your beloved Balmain & Wests and live in the past if you must.
 
And while I'm on a rant. Change ISP team to Wests tigers to stop division
 
@ said:
18 years as a JV and people are still squabbling over Balmain and Wests. We are Wests tigers now. Embrace our identity but also embrace our 2 club history. It's not hard to understand that had we not merged neither of our clubs would of survived. If it means that much to old die hards follow magpies in ISP or pull out some old videos of your beloved Balmain & Wests and live in the past if you must.
Click to expand...

Agree 100%
 
@ said:
@ said:
And while I'm on a rant. Change ISP team to Wests tigers to stop division

Agreed. I couldn't understand why they changed it this year.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

Yeti I think its
Because Wests Ashfield are living in the past. It will probably take another 30 odd years until all the old timers that are stuck in the past are respectively gone, by that stage it should be all good and majority of our supporters will be Wests tigers supporters not Balmain or wests. I think the best way to immediately try and stop the rot is to ditch Cambo and Leichhardt stadiums and play every home game out of the new stadium or sfs or homebush and only 1 game each at Cambo and Leichhardt per year in traditional jersey. That would still show acknowledgement to our 2 great foundation clubs but anywhere but those two old stadiums. Embrace our history but start looking to the future is they way to go imo
 
If the club has reached financial sustainability why have it stopped nearly two months ago from spending for new good new quality players?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Members online

Total: 382 (members: 15, guests: 367)
Back
Top