WT Ownership, The Board & Senior Management - MEGA Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey guys, we met with the review team last week. I am confident that the guys conducting the review are doing so in good faith and are very genuine about making recommendations that will improve the club moving forward. If the recommendations are implemented we will get some real positive change at the club.
 
Hey guys, we met with the review team last week. I am confident that the guys conducting the review are doing so in good faith and are very genuine about making recommendations that will improve the club moving forward. If the recommendations are implemented we will get some real positive change at the club.
Thanks, that’s really good news.
I hope they don’t rush through their discovery phase, because sometimes things aren’t what they appear to be on the surface.
I still think they should have got in an organisational development professional for the job, but it is what it is, and any improvement would be gratefully appreciated.
Great to hear some positivity.
Thanks again for your consistent efforts.
 
Hey guys, we met with the review team last week. I am confident that the guys conducting the review are doing so in good faith and are very genuine about making recommendations that will improve the club moving forward. If the recommendations are implemented we will get some real positive change at the club.
Did they give you any time frame on how long the review might take to complete?
 
Why re-sign Lee Hagipantelis for another 3 years, and particularly at this time?
Let me partially answer that question with more Questions?

Is it possible the board is already aware of some of the recommendations of this ‘review’, and therefore expecting to have wholesale changes on the board? Perhaps at least 4?
Including the possibility of changes to policies and procedures, and including communication concerning the footy department? I’m not a big fan of Lee, mainly because he tells us what we want to hear, but he does have the leadership qualities to stabilise a relatively new board which presumably behaves differently.
If not Lee, then who?
 
Why re-sign Lee Hagipantelis for another 3 years, and particularly at this time?
Let me partially answer that question with more Questions?

Is it possible the board is already aware of some of the recommendations of this ‘review’, and therefore expecting to have wholesale changes on the board? Perhaps at least 4?
Including the possibility of changes to policies and procedures, and including communication concerning the footy department? I’m not a big fan of Lee, mainly because he tells us what we want to hear, but he does have the leadership qualities to stabilise a relatively new board which presumably behaves differently.
If not Lee, then who?
He signed himself, no point targeting him. Let’s try and have serious malignant influences and bias’ removed?
 
Hopefully everyone on here, bar the wannabe smoking gun, have been sharing their thoughts and feedback with the board and continue to do so...
 
Hey guys, we met with the review team last week. I am confident that the guys conducting the review are doing so in good faith and are very genuine about making recommendations that will improve the club moving forward. If the recommendations are implemented we will get some real positive change at the club.
Did they mention if they've spoken to all the board members? Past coaches, player agents etc?
 
Did they mention if they've spoken to all the board members? Past coaches, player agents etc?
I can't mention names, but they have spoken to people from across the game. People involved at the Wests Tigers, NRL, media, past players and coaches, player agents, members and fans.

They have had people reaching out to them requesting to be involved, big name people.

I am extremely confident that the majority of people will be very supportive of the recommendations that are going to be made in the review.
 
I can't mention names, but they have spoken to people from across the game. People involved at the Wests Tigers, NRL, media, past players and coaches, player agents, members and fans.

They have had people reaching out to them requesting to be involved, big name people.

I am extremely confident that the majority of people will be very supportive of the recommendations that are going to be made in the review.

Let's hope the only people who can do something with the advice actually do so even if it means them jumping on their swords.As much as i desperately want to see positive change at the club i have little to no faith in the people that can actually make the changes.
I would love to be wrong
 
Let's hope the only people who can do something with the advice actually do so even if it means them jumping on their swords.As much as i desperately want to see positive change at the club i have little to no faith in the people that can actually make the changes.
I would love to be wrong
Mate, that is the key point, I believe there are some extremely positive recommendations coming to the Holman Barnes Group very soon. They have to do the right thing by the club when those recommendations are handed to them.

The fact the Holman Barnes Group publicly announced this review and some of the people who have been involved in the process is going to make very difficult for them to sweep this under the rug. If they do then that will be the time to really unite as a fanbase as the evidence and recommendations for change will be there as support.
 
Mate, that is the key point, I believe there are some extremely positive recommendations coming to the Holman Barnes Group very soon. They have to do the right thing by the club when those recommendations are handed to them.

The fact the Holman Barnes Group publicly announced this review and some of the people who have been involved in the process is going to make very difficult for them to sweep this under the rug. If they do then that will be the time to really unite as a fanbase as the evidence and recommendations for change will be there as support.
Do you know if the results in full or even in summary will be made public at the conclusion of the review?
 
Do you know if the results in full or even in summary will be made public at the conclusion of the review?
I doubt that the full results will be made public as I am sure that it will contain some sensitive information but we hope and will be pushing for the recommendations to be made public.

Those decisions fall to the Holman Barnes Group but I believe that because they publicly announced the review then there needs to be a public response to the review.
 
Last edited:
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/nrl/ci...hairman-lee-hagipantelis-20231005-p5e9yx.html

A civil war is set to erupt at the Wests Tigers with chairman Lee Hagipantelis on the brink of being overthrown after rejecting an invitation from the club’s majority shareholder to stand down from his position just days after being re-appointed.

The Herald can also reveal that Tigers powerbrokers have discussed the possibility of bringing the likes of former NSW premier and ex-Tigers chairman Barry O’Farrell, as well as former Australian Olympic Committee president John Coates, onto the board in some capacity.

It comes in the midst of an external governance and culture review into the under-siege club that will place both Hagipantelis and chief executive Justin Pascoe under the microscope following the Tigers’ 12th consecutive season without a finals appearance.

The review has been called by the Holman Barnes Group, the 60 per cent majority shareholder of the club that also runs Wests Ashfield Leagues Club.

Sources talking under the condition of anonymity told this masthead that Tigers board member Tony Andreacchio, speaking on behalf of the Holman Barnes Group, recently contacted Hagipantelis to invite him to stand down as chairman.

Andreacchio also informed Hagipantelis that his tenure was only extended as an independent director and not as chairman despite News Corp last month reporting that Hagipantelis was re-elected as chairman of the Wests Tigers until November 2025.

The move could put the club’s near $1,000,000 a season major sponsorship deal with Hagipantelis’ company Bryden’s Lawyers in jeopardy.

Certain members of the board are now disputing the details around the motion that was passed at the meeting last month. The minutes of the meeting were taken by Tigers chief financial officer Mark Sawicki.

Hagipantelis is privately strongly refuting the notion that he was only extended as a director, and not as chairman.

“This review has been commissioned by the Holman Barnes group and all enquiries concerning the review should be directed to them”, Hagipantelis said when contacted for comment by this masthead.

Andreacchio did not want to be drawn into the specifics of his conversation with the chairman.

“At the moment we have an external review on the whole club,” he told this masthead. “It’s probably an inappropriate time to make any formal or informal comment at the moment. This review is very critical.

“The Holman Barnes Group is one of the major shareholders and are very much behind it. I think any comment doesn’t serve any purpose at the moment. Currently he is the chairman.”

The Wests Tigers constitution provides for up to nine directors to be appointed. At the moment there is only seven following the resignation of independent director James Myatt a month ago.

Sources talking under the condition of anonymity told this masthead that part of the reason the board moved to extend Hagipantelis’ tenure was to ensure the board remained validly constituted.

Under the constitution, the board has to have at least one independent director at all times. Hagipantelis is the only independent director currently on the board.

When asked if the Tigers wanted to bring O’Farrell or Coates on the board, Andreacchio insisted a decision wouldn’t be made until after the review.

“Independent directors are always open up to review to see who is available and who would like to come on,” he said. “It’s something we’re holding off on until the end of this review. Until then, there’ll be no further action. I don’t want to derail the review in any shape or form.”

The review is also a topic of great conjecture. Sources talking under the condition of anonymity have also questioned the independence of one of the two men appointed to undertake the review.

Former NRL chief financial officer Tony Crawford and Gary Barnier are in charge of the review set to be completed by the end of the month.

The questioning of independence surrounds Barnier, who is one of 13 Wests Tigers Foundation members announced on the club’s website that have donated $100,000 to the club over a four-year period. The Barnier Family is also listed as one of the “Foundation 13” with another $100,000 donation to the club. So too is Hagipantelis and Coates.

The donation for this group is a tax-deductible $100,000 for a lifetime involvement — it can be made in pairs and payment plans up to four years.

Barnier strongly opposes suggestion that his financial contribution means he has a conflict of interest.

“I took the decision to provide money to the club through that Foundation 13, which meant I could contribute - because I can afford to contribute - but I get nothing in return for it,” Barnier told this masthead.

“It’s just like a super-high level of membership, I suppose. That’s the beginning and end of it. I’m not getting paid for this review.

“I’ve offered to do it because of my emotional connection and my family’s emotional connection with the club. That’s all it is. I can’t think of any possible conflict of interest.”
 
One replied...... Said they couldn't answer now why Lee was re-elected before the review was completed.... Because there's an external review underway and any comment would be prejudicial

SOUNDS as. Much an arrogant wank.as.lee does
Was it Tony?
Or did they reply anonymously?

Just remember reading this and thought about it after reading the article published just now.

Also to the OP. James Myatt has stepped down from the board as of last month. Also mentioned in that article.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top